Literature DB >> 32762625

Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen PET: Therapy Response Assessment in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Felipe G Barbosa1, Marcelo A Queiroz1, Daniela A Ferraro1, Rafael F Nunes1, Priscilla R Dreyer1, Elaine C Zaniboni1, Larissa B Costa1, Diogo A Bastos1, José Flávio G Marin1, Carlos A Buchpiguel1.   

Abstract

Therapy response assessment is a critical step in cancer management, leading clinicians to optimize the use of therapeutic options during the course of the disease. Imaging is a pivotal biomarker for therapy response evaluation in oncology and has gained wider use through the development of reproducible data-based guidelines, of which the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors is the most successful example. Disease-specific criteria have also been proposed, and the Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria are the mainstay for prostate cancer (PC). However, conventional imaging evaluation in metastatic PC has several limitations, including (a) the inability to detect small-volume disease, (b) the high prevalence of bone (nonmeasurable) lesions at imaging, and (c) the established role of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels as the biomarker of choice for response assessment and disease progression. In addition, there are an increasing number of newer treatment options with various effects on imaging features. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET has improved patient selection for newer treatments, such as metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) or radionuclide therapy. The role of PSMA PET in response assessment for many metastatic PC therapeutic options (MDT, androgen deprivation therapy, chemotherapy, radionuclide therapy, and immunotherapy) is an evolving issue, with emerging data showing good correlation with PSA levels and clinical outcome. However, there are specific implications of each therapy (especially androgen deprivation therapy and immunotherapy) on PSMA expression by PC cells, leading to potential pitfalls and inaccuracies that must be known by radiologists. Despite some limitations, PSMA PET is addressing gaps left by conventional imaging methods (eg, CT and bone scanning) and nonimaging biomarkers (PSA levels) in metastatic PC therapy response assessment, a role that can be improved with advances like refinement of interpretation criteria and whole-body tumor burden quantification.© RSNA, 2020See discussion on this article by Barwick and Castellucci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32762625     DOI: 10.1148/rg.2020200058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  4 in total

Review 1.  Molecular Imaging Assessment of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar; Patrick M Colletti
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  Competitive Advantage of PSMA Theranostics in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 29.146

Review 3.  The Role and Significance of Bioumoral Markers in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Traian Constantin; Diana Alexandra Savu; Ștefana Bucur; Gabriel Predoiu; Maria Magdalena Constantin; Viorel Jinga
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 4.  Gallium-68 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography: A Practical Guide for Radiologists and Clinicians.

Authors:  Fathima Fijula Palot Manzil; Harleen Kaur; Lajos Szabados
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.