Andre Macedo1, Alisson M Gontijo1. 1. Chronic Diseases Research Center, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua do Instituto Bacteriológico 5, 1150-190, Lisbon, Portugal.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The human body is made up of hundreds-perhaps thousands-of cell types and states, most of which are currently inaccessible genetically. Intersectional genetic approaches can increase the number of genetically accessible cells, but the scope and safety of these approaches have not been systematically assessed. A typical intersectional method acts like an "AND" logic gate by converting the input of 2 or more active, yet unspecific, regulatory elements (REs) into a single cell type specific synthetic output. RESULTS: Here, we systematically assessed the intersectional genetics landscape of the human genome using a subset of cells from a large RE usage atlas (Functional ANnoTation Of the Mammalian genome 5 consortium, FANTOM5) obtained by cap analysis of gene expression sequencing (CAGE-seq). We developed the heuristics and algorithms to retrieve and quality-rank "AND" gate intersections. Of the 154 primary cell types surveyed, >90% can be distinguished from each other with as few as 3 to 4 active REs, with quantifiable safety and robustness. We call these minimal intersections of active REs with cell-type diagnostic potential "versatile entry codes" (VEnCodes). Each of the 158 cancer cell types surveyed could also be distinguished from the healthy primary cell types with small VEnCodes, most of which were robust to intra- and interindividual variation. Methods for the cross-validation of CAGE-seq-derived VEnCodes and for the extraction of VEnCodes from pooled single-cell sequencing data are also presented. CONCLUSIONS: Our work provides a systematic view of the intersectional genetics landscape in humans and demonstrates the potential of these approaches for future gene delivery technologies.
BACKGROUND: The human body is made up of hundreds-perhaps thousands-of cell types and states, most of which are currently inaccessible genetically. Intersectional genetic approaches can increase the number of genetically accessible cells, but the scope and safety of these approaches have not been systematically assessed. A typical intersectional method acts like an "AND" logic gate by converting the input of 2 or more active, yet unspecific, regulatory elements (REs) into a single cell type specific synthetic output. RESULTS: Here, we systematically assessed the intersectional genetics landscape of the human genome using a subset of cells from a large RE usage atlas (Functional ANnoTation Of the Mammalian genome 5 consortium, FANTOM5) obtained by cap analysis of gene expression sequencing (CAGE-seq). We developed the heuristics and algorithms to retrieve and quality-rank "AND" gate intersections. Of the 154 primary cell types surveyed, >90% can be distinguished from each other with as few as 3 to 4 active REs, with quantifiable safety and robustness. We call these minimal intersections of active REs with cell-type diagnostic potential "versatile entry codes" (VEnCodes). Each of the 158 cancer cell types surveyed could also be distinguished from the healthy primary cell types with small VEnCodes, most of which were robust to intra- and interindividual variation. Methods for the cross-validation of CAGE-seq-derived VEnCodes and for the extraction of VEnCodes from pooled single-cell sequencing data are also presented. CONCLUSIONS: Our work provides a systematic view of the intersectional genetics landscape in humans and demonstrates the potential of these approaches for future gene delivery technologies.
Authors: Joanna K L Wong; Rashin Mohseni; Amir Ali Hamidieh; Robert E MacLaren; Nagy Habib; Alexander M Seifalian Journal: Trends Biotechnol Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 19.536
Authors: Julie George; Jing Shan Lim; Se Jin Jang; Yupeng Cun; Luka Ozretić; Gu Kong; Frauke Leenders; Xin Lu; Lynnette Fernández-Cuesta; Graziella Bosco; Christian Müller; Ilona Dahmen; Nadine S Jahchan; Kwon-Sik Park; Dian Yang; Anthony N Karnezis; Dedeepya Vaka; Angela Torres; Maia Segura Wang; Jan O Korbel; Roopika Menon; Sung-Min Chun; Deokhoon Kim; Matt Wilkerson; Neil Hayes; David Engelmann; Brigitte Pützer; Marc Bos; Sebastian Michels; Ignacija Vlasic; Danila Seidel; Berit Pinther; Philipp Schaub; Christian Becker; Janine Altmüller; Jun Yokota; Takashi Kohno; Reika Iwakawa; Koji Tsuta; Masayuki Noguchi; Thomas Muley; Hans Hoffmann; Philipp A Schnabel; Iver Petersen; Yuan Chen; Alex Soltermann; Verena Tischler; Chang-min Choi; Yong-Hee Kim; Pierre P Massion; Yong Zou; Dragana Jovanovic; Milica Kontic; Gavin M Wright; Prudence A Russell; Benjamin Solomon; Ina Koch; Michael Lindner; Lucia A Muscarella; Annamaria la Torre; John K Field; Marko Jakopovic; Jelena Knezevic; Esmeralda Castaños-Vélez; Luca Roz; Ugo Pastorino; Odd-Terje Brustugun; Marius Lund-Iversen; Erik Thunnissen; Jens Köhler; Martin Schuler; Johan Botling; Martin Sandelin; Montserrat Sanchez-Cespedes; Helga B Salvesen; Viktor Achter; Ulrich Lang; Magdalena Bogus; Peter M Schneider; Thomas Zander; Sascha Ansén; Michael Hallek; Jürgen Wolf; Martin Vingron; Yasushi Yatabe; William D Travis; Peter Nürnberg; Christian Reinhardt; Sven Perner; Lukas Heukamp; Reinhard Büttner; Stefan A Haas; Elisabeth Brambilla; Martin Peifer; Julien Sage; Roman K Thomas Journal: Nature Date: 2015-07-13 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Mathieu Morel; Roman Shtrahman; Varda Rotter; Lior Nissim; Roy H Bar-Ziv Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-07-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Darren A Cusanovich; Andrew J Hill; Delasa Aghamirzaie; Riza M Daza; Hannah A Pliner; Joel B Berletch; Galina N Filippova; Xingfan Huang; Lena Christiansen; William S DeWitt; Choli Lee; Samuel G Regalado; David F Read; Frank J Steemers; Christine M Disteche; Cole Trapnell; Jay Shendure Journal: Cell Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Marina Lizio; Jayson Harshbarger; Hisashi Shimoji; Jessica Severin; Takeya Kasukawa; Serkan Sahin; Imad Abugessaisa; Shiro Fukuda; Fumi Hori; Sachi Ishikawa-Kato; Christopher J Mungall; Erik Arner; J Kenneth Baillie; Nicolas Bertin; Hidemasa Bono; Michiel de Hoon; Alexander D Diehl; Emmanuel Dimont; Tom C Freeman; Kaori Fujieda; Winston Hide; Rajaram Kaliyaperumal; Toshiaki Katayama; Timo Lassmann; Terrence F Meehan; Koro Nishikata; Hiromasa Ono; Michael Rehli; Albin Sandelin; Erik A Schultes; Peter A C 't Hoen; Zuotian Tatum; Mark Thompson; Tetsuro Toyoda; Derek W Wright; Carsten O Daub; Masayoshi Itoh; Piero Carninci; Yoshihide Hayashizaki; Alistair R R Forrest; Hideya Kawaji Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2015-01-05 Impact factor: 13.583