Literature DB >> 32760898

A comparison of application frequency of physical therapy modalities in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain.

Turgay Altınbilek1, Sadiye Murat2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the effects of physical therapy modalities five days a week versus twice a week with a three-day interval on pain, depression, and functional disability in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2018 and November 2018, a total of 60 patients (39 females, 21 males; mean age 41.0±6.8 years; range, 25 to 55 years) with chronic mechanical low back pain were included. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=30) received physical therapy five days a week for a total of 15 sessions, while Group 2 (n=30) received physical therapy twice a week with a three-day interval for a total of six sessions. Per protocol, all patients were applied hot pack for 20 min, followed by conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 20 min and therapeutic ultrasound (US) for 10 min in each session. All patients were given exercise training and were instructed to do twice a day up to four weeks after the completion of physical therapy sessions. The severity of low back pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), the severity of depression using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and functional disability using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). All patients were evaluated before and after physical therapy and at four weeks. The results were compared between the groups.
RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the age, gender, body mass index, occupation, VAS, BDI, and ODI scores at the time of randomization (p>0.05). Intra-group analysis showed a significant improvement in all parameters after physical therapy compared to pre-treatment values and at four weeks compared to the post-treatment values (p<0.001). The differences of changes were used for the inter- group analysis which revealed a difference of change in favor of improvement was significantly higher in Group 2 than Group 1 (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the post-treatment values and values at four weeks (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION: Our study results suggest that both physical therapy modalities applied five days week and twice a week are effective in pain, depression, and functional disability. However, physical therapy protocol applied twice a week yields more improvement, indicating that it is more advantageous with less cost and lost workdays.
Copyright © 2020, Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic mechanical low back pain; physical therapy; treatment duration

Year:  2020        PMID: 32760898      PMCID: PMC7401673          DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2020.4192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 2587-1250


  18 in total

Review 1.  The Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; P B Pynsent
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  An inventory for measuring depression.

Authors:  A T BECK; C H WARD; M MENDELSON; J MOCK; J ERBAUGH
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1961-06

3.  Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Edibe Yakut; Tülin Düger; Cigdem Oksüz; Selma Yörükan; Kemal Ureten; Deran Turan; Tüzün Frat; Sedat Kiraz; Nuray Krd; Hülya Kayhan; Yavuz Yakut; Cagatay Güler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  A comparison of resource use and cost in direct access versus physician referral episodes of physical therapy.

Authors:  J M Mitchell; G de Lissovoy
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1997-01

5.  Physiotherapy management of low back pain: a survey of current practice in northern Ireland.

Authors:  Jacqueline H Gracey; Suzanne M McDonough; G David Baxter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Exposure to a specific pulsed low-frequency magnetic field: a double-blind placebo-controlled study of effects on pain ratings in rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia patients.

Authors:  N M Shupak; Julia C McKay; Warren R Nielson; Gary B Rollman; Frank S Prato; Alex W Thomas
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.037

7.  A randomized, single blind placebo controlled clinical trial on the effect of continuous ultrasound on low back pain.

Authors:  N N Ansari; S Ebadi; S Talebian; S Naghdi; H Mazaheri; G Olyaei; S Jalaie
Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11

8.  Psychic predictors of outcomes of physical therapy.

Authors:  Nilgun Simsir Atalay; Nuray Akkaya; Sibel Konukcu; Ceyhan Sengul Balci; Fusun Sahin
Journal:  J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.398

9.  Cost of low back pain: results from a national register study in Sweden.

Authors:  Gylfi Olafsson; Emma Jonsson; Peter Fritzell; Olle Hägg; Fredrik Borgström
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Are measures of function and disability important in low back care?

Authors:  A Delitto
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1994-05
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Jenna Ellis; Rachel Ogilvie; Antti Malmivaara; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.