| Literature DB >> 32760210 |
Jie-Ying Liang1,2, De-Shen Wang1,2, Hao-Cheng Lin1,2, Xiu-Xing Chen1,2, Hui Yang1,2, Yun Zheng1,3, Yu-Hong Li1,2.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly heterogeneous disease, which makes the prognostic prediction challenging. Ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of regulated cell death, can be induced by sorafenib. However, the prognostic value of ferroptosis-related genes in HCC remains to be further elucidated. In this study, the mRNA expression profiles and corresponding clinical data of HCC patients were downloaded from public databases. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression model was utilized to construct a multigene signature in the TCGA cohort. HCC patients from the ICGC cohort were used for validation. Our results showed that most of the ferroptosis-related genes (81.7%) were differentially expressed between HCC and adjacent normal tissues in the TCGA cohort. Twenty-six differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were correlated with overall survival (OS) in the univariate Cox regression analysis (all adjusted P< 0.05). A 10-gene signature was constructed to stratify patients into two risk groups. Patients in the high-risk group showed significantly reduced OS compared with patients in the low-risk group (P < 0.001 in the TCGA cohort and P = 0.001 in the ICGC cohort). The risk score was an independent predictor for OS in multivariate Cox regression analyses (HR> 1, P< 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis confirmed the signature's predictive capacity. Functional analysis revealed that immune-related pathways were enriched, and immune status were different between two risk groups. In conclusion, a novel ferroptosis-related gene signature can be used for prognostic prediction in HCC. Targeting ferroptosis may be a therapeutic alternative for HCC. © The author(s).Entities:
Keywords: ferroptosis; gene signature; hepatocellular carcinoma; immune status; overall survival
Year: 2020 PMID: 32760210 PMCID: PMC7378635 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.45050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biol Sci ISSN: 1449-2288 Impact factor: 6.580
Figure 1Flow chart of data collection and analysis.
Clinical characteristics of the HCC patients used in this study
| TCGA cohort | LIRI-JP cohort | |
|---|---|---|
| 365 | 231 | |
| 61(16-90) | 69(31-89) | |
| Female | 119(32.6%) | 61(26.4%) |
| Male | 246(67.4%) | 170(72.6%) |
| ≤200 | 201(55.1%) | NA |
| >200 | 75(20.5%) | NA |
| unknown | 89(24.4%) | NA |
| Grade 1 | 55(15.1%) | NA |
| Grade 2 | 175(47.9%) | NA |
| Grade 3 | 118(32.3%) | NA |
| Grade 4 | 12(3.3%) | NA |
| unknown | 5(1.4%) | NA |
| Yes | 106(29.0%) | NA |
| No | 205(56.2%) | NA |
| unknown | 54(14.8%) | NA |
| I | 170(46.6%) | 36(15.6%) |
| II | 84(23.0%) | 105(45.5%) |
| III | 83(22.7%) | 71(30.7%) |
| IV | 4(1.1%) | 19(8.2%) |
| unknown | 24(6.6%) | 0(0.0%) |
| OS days (median) | 556 | 780 |
| censored(%) | 126(34.5) | 42(18.2) |
Figure 2Identification of the candidate ferroptosis-related genes in the TCGA cohort. a. Venn diagram to identify differentially expressed genes between tumor and adjacent normal tissue that were correlated with OS. b. The 26 overlapping genes were all upregulated in tumor tissue. c. Forest plots showing the results of the univariate Cox regression analysis between gene expression and OS. d. The PPI network downloaded from the STRING database indicated the interactions among the candidate genes. e. The correlation network of candidate genes. The correlation coefficients are represented by different colors.
Figure 3Prognostic analysis of the 10-gene signature model in the TCGA cohort. a. The distribution and median value of the risk scores in the TCGA cohort. b. PCA plot of the TCGA cohort. c. t-SNE analysis of the TCGA cohort. d. The distributions of OS status, OS and risk score in the TCGA cohort. e. Kaplan-Meier curves for the OS of patients in the high-risk group and low-risk group in the TCGA cohort. f. AUC of time-dependent ROC curves verified the prognostic performance of the risk score in the TCGA cohort.
Baseline characteristics of the patients in different risk groups
| Characteristics | TCGA-LIHC cohort | ICGC-LIRP-JI cohort | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High risk | Low risk | High risk | Low risk | ||||
| 0.882 | 0.315 | ||||||
| Female | 60 (33.0) | 59 (32.2) | 27 (23.5) | 34 (29.3) | |||
| Male | 122 (67.0) | 124 (67.8) | 88 (76.5) | 82 (70.7) | |||
| 0.789 | 0.975 | ||||||
| < 60y | 81 (44.5) | 84 (45.9) | 22 (19.1) | 22 (19.0) | |||
| ≥60y | 101 (55.5) | 99 (54.1) | 93 (80.9) | 94 (81.0) | |||
| - | |||||||
| G1+G2 | 94 (51.6) | 136 (74.3) | - | - | |||
| G3+G4 | 85 (46.7) | 45 (24.6) | - | - | |||
| unknown | 3 (1.6) | 2 (1.1) | - | - | |||
| ≤200ng/ml | 84 (46.2) | 117 (63.9) | - | - | |||
| >200ng/ml | 46 (25.3) | 29 (15.8) | - | - | |||
| unknown | 52 (28.6) | 37 (20.2) | - | - | |||
| No | 87 (47.8) | 118 (64.5) | - | - | |||
| Yes | 60 (33.0) | 46 (25.1) | - | - | |||
| unknown | 35 (19.2) | 19 (10.4) | - | - | |||
| Ⅰ+Ⅱ | 116 (63.7) | 138 (75.4) | 58 (50.4) | 83 (71.6) | |||
| Ⅲ+Ⅳ | 57 (31.3) | 30 (16.4) | 57 (49.6) | 33 (28.4) | |||
| unknown | 9 (4.9) | 15 (8.2) | - | - | |||
Figure 4Validation of the 10-gene signature in the ICGC cohort. a. The distribution and median value of the risk scores in the ICGC cohort. b. PCA plot of the ICGC cohort. c. t-SNE analysis of the ICGC cohort. d. The distributions of OS status, OS and risk score. e. Kaplan-Meier curves for the OS of patients in the high-risk group and low-risk group. f. AUC of time-dependent ROC curves in the ICGC cohort.
Figure 5Results of the univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses regarding OS in the TCGA derivation cohort (a) and the ICGC validation cohort (b).
Figure 6Representative results of GO (a, c) and KEGG analyses (b, d) . The most significant or shared GO enrichment and KEGG pathways in the TCGA cohort (a, b) and ICGC cohort (c, d) are displayed. The pink rectangles indicate the immune-related pathways that are overlapped between the two cohorts.
Figure 7Comparison of the ssGSEA scores between different risk groups in the TCGA cohort (a, b) and ICGC cohort (c, d). The scores of 16 immune cells (a, c) and 13 immune-related functions (b, d) are displayed in boxplots. CCR, cytokine-cytokine receptor. Adjusted P values were showed as: ns, not significant; *, P< 0.05; **, P< 0.01; ***, P< 0.001.