| Literature DB >> 32754003 |
Fatemeh Barati1, Mahdi Pouresmaieli1, Elena Ekrami1, Sahar Asghari1, Farzad Ramezani Ziarani2, Matin Mamoudifard1.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: COVID-19 disease with a high rate of contagious and highly nonspecific symptoms, is an infectious disease caused by a newly discovered coronavirus. Most people who fall sick with COVID-19 will experience mild to moderate symptoms such as respiratory symptoms, cough, dyspnea, fever, and viral pneumonia and recover without any special cure. However, some others need special and emergency treatment to get rid of this widespread disease. Till now, there are numbers of proposed novel compounds as well as standards therapeutics agent existed for other conditions seems to have efficacy against the 2019-nCoV. Some which are being tested for MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV are validated that could be also efficient against this new coronavirus. However, there are currently no effective specific antivirals or drug combinations introduced for 2019-nCoV specifically that be supported by high-level evidence. The main purpose of this paper is to review typical and ongoing treatments for coronavirus disease including home remedies, herbal medicine, chemical drugs, plasma therapy, and also vaccinies. In this regards, famous herbal medicines and common chemical drugs which are routinely to be prescribed for patients are introduced. Moreover, a section is assigned to the drug interactions and some outdated drugs which have been proved to be inefficient. We hope that this work could pave the way for researchers to develop faster and more reliable methods for earlier treatment of patients and rescue more people.Entities:
Keywords: Coronavirus; Drugs; Home remedies; Plasma; Therapeutic compounds; Vaccine
Year: 2020 PMID: 32754003 PMCID: PMC7377207 DOI: 10.1186/s12575-020-00129-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Proced Online ISSN: 1480-9222 Impact factor: 3.244
The Chinese herbal plant that used for treating for SARS-CoV-2
| No | Latin herbal plant name | Usage |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Antipyretic-detoxifying | |
| 2 | ||
| 3 | ||
| 4 | ||
| 5 | ||
| 6 | Antitussive antiasthmatics | |
| 7 | ||
| 8 | ||
| 9 | ||
| 10 | ||
| 11 | ||
| 12 |
Public beliefs about herbal plants. Is it effective or not?
| No | Herbal plant name | Effective | Ineffective |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | * | ||
| 2 | Unknown | ||
| 3 | * | ||
| 4 | * | ||
| 5 | * | ||
| 6 | * | ||
| 7 | * | ||
| 8 | * | ||
| 9 | * | ||
| 10 | * | ||
| 11 | * | ||
Some herbal drugs which are used in countries for immunity booster
| No | Herbal plant name | No | Herbal plant name |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | ||
| 2 | 9 | ||
| 3 | 10 | ||
| 4 | 11 | ||
| 5 | 12 | ||
| 6 | 13 | ||
| 7 | 14 |
Interaction between regular usage drugs (http://www.covid19-druginteractions.org)
Text Legend
↑: protentional increased exposure of the comedication
⇑: protentional increased exposure of COVID drug
↔: no significant effect
♥: one or both drugs may cause QT and/or PR prolongation. ECG monitoring is advised if Coad ministered
Numbers refer to an increase or decrease in AUC as observed in drug-drug infraction studies
Interaction between drugs [87]
| Therapy | Specific interaction |
|---|---|
| Ribavirin | Warfarin |
| Lopinavir/Ritonavir | Apixaban Rivaroxaban Clopidogrel Ticagrelor Atorvastatin Rosuvastatin Lovastatin Simvastatin QT-prolonging medication Digoxin |
| Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine | Metoprolol, carvedilol, propranolol, labetalol QT-prolonging agents Digoxin |
Clinical Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2-Infected Patients Who Received Convalescent Plasma
| Patient | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Sex | Male | Male | Female | Female | Male |
| Age, y | 70s | 60s | 50s | 30s | 60s |
| Weight, kg | 55 | 85 | 60 | 41.5 | 87 |
| Smoking | No | No | No | No | No |
| Blood type | B | B | B | A | B |
| Coexisting chronic disease | None | Hypertension; mitral Insufficiency | None | None | None |
| Disease presentation and course | |||||
| Estimated incubation period, da | 1 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 15 |
| Interval between symptom onset and admission, d | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| Interval between admission and plasma transfusion, d | 22 | 10 | 20 | 19 | 20 |
| Complications prior to plasma transfusion | Bacterial pneumonia; Severe ARDS; MODS | Bacterial pneumonia; Fungal pneumonia; severe ARDS; myocardial damage | severe ARDS | severe ARDS | severe ARDS |
| Most severe disease classification | Critical | Critical | Critical | Critical | Critical |
| Treatments | |||||
| Steroids | Methylprednisolone | Methylprednisolone | Methylprednisolone | Methylprednisolone | Methylprednisolone |
| Antivirals | Lopinavir/ritonavir; Interferon alfa-1b; favipiravir | Lopinavir/ritonavir; Arbidol; darunavir | Lopinavir/ritonavir; Interferon alfa-1b | Interferon alfa-1b; favipiravir | Lopinavir/ritonavir; Interferon alfa-1b |
Comparison of Viral Load, Clinical Indexes, and Laboratory Results Before and After Convalescent Plasma Transfusion (continued)
| Patient | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| IL-6, pg/ml (normal range, 0–7) | |||||
| Before transfusion | 70.5 | 438.2 | 63.9 | 79.1 | 87.8 |
| Day 1 posttransfusion | 74.9 | NT | 118.5 | 39.3 | NT |
| Day 3 posttransfusion | 34.5 | 1045.0 | 67.0 | 25.8 | 797.9 |
| Day 5 posttransfusion | 24.1 | 334.1 | 590.5 | NT | NT |
| Day 7 posttransfusion | 30.8 | 29.8 | 174.3 | 34.0 | 69.9 |
| Day 12 posttransfusion | 6.1 | 31.8 | NT | 2.7 | 54.9 |
| Length of hospital stay, d | Remains hospitalized | Remains hospitalized | 53 | 51 | 55 |
| Current status as of March 25,2020 | Stable, still receiving mechanical ventilation | Stable, still receiving mechanical ventilation | Discharged home | Discharged home | Discharged home |