Literature DB >> 32753619

Transcriptome analysis of blood and spleen in virulent and avirulent mouse malaria infection.

Yuancun Zhao1, Caroline Hosking2, Deirdre Cunningham2, Jean Langhorne3, Jing-Wen Lin4.   

Abstract

Malaria is a devastating infectious disease and the immune response is complex and dynamic during a course of a malarial infection. Rodent malaria models allow detailed time-series studies of the host response in multiple organs. Here, we describe two comprehensive datasets containing host transcriptomic data from both the blood and spleen throughout an acute blood stage infection of virulent or avirulent Plasmodium chabaudi infection in C57BL/6 mice. The mRNA expression profiles were generated using Illumina BeadChip microarray. These datasets provide a groundwork for comprehensive and comparative studies on host gene expression in early, acute and recovering phases of a blood stage infection in both the blood and spleen, to explore the interaction between the two, and importantly to investigate whether these responses differ in virulent and avirulent infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32753619      PMCID: PMC7403358          DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-00592-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Data        ISSN: 2052-4463            Impact factor:   6.444


Background & Summary

Malaria is a mosquito-borne disease caused by Plasmodium parasites, inflicting nearly half a million deaths annually, mostly in low and middle income countries (World Malaria Report 2018). The deaths are mainly caused by malaria complications that particularly affect young children and pregnant women. Clinical manifestations of malaria take place during the blood stages of the infection, during which host-parasite interactions occur mainly within the vasculature and most importantly in the spleen[1,2]. As the infection progresses, the parasite also interacts with, and damages multiple host organs via the process of sequestration[3]. This adherence of infected red blood cells to the endothelium of capillaries and venues, causes complications such as cerebral malaria and acute lung injury[1,4]. Leukocytes that are tissue resident, or that are recruited into the inflamed/damaged organs are in contact with the parasite or parasite product such as hemozoin (byproduct of hemoglobin degradation)[5] and other pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs)[6], resulting in activation of downstream immune genes. It has long been established that spleen is the most important immune organ that generate anti-malarial immune responses[1,2]. It has no afferent lymph vessels and collects its leukocytes directly from blood. The circulating immune cells continuously migrate into and out of the spleen, with their changed transcriptional activities during the course of malaria infection. In support of this, a recent study showed that parasite specific CD8+ T cell were primed in the spleen and migrated into the lungs[7]; another study showed that the ‘lung pathology’ signature can be picked up by analysing whole blood transcriptome[8]. Genome-wide expression profiling is being increasingly applied to dissect the complex details of the host response to malaria infection[9,10]. As blood is the most accessible tissue in field studies, numerous field studies analyse blood transcriptomes as read-outs for anti-malarial immunity[11-13]. Therefore, it is very important to understand whether the immune responses detected in the blood serve as a reliable proxy for immune responses occurring in the spleen; if so, to what extent and at which stage of infection are they most closely related. To date, few studies have performed transcriptomic analyses of the blood in the mouse model[9] and only one study carried out by us attempted to investigate the similarities between blood and spleen transcriptome[14]. Here we describe two comprehensive, time-series analyses of the blood and spleen transcriptomic changes throughout the acute phase of blood stage infection (Fig. 1a) using a well-established rodent malaria model, Plasmodium chabaudi. This parasite is widely used to study host responses as it mirrors many pathological manifestations associated with P. falciparum infection, the most deadly species infecting humans, including parasite sequestration, severe malarial anemia, and chronic infection[8,15,16]. Time-series gene expression analysis is most helpful in identifying genes with transient expression changes and in investigation of gene regulation profiles during an infection. In our previous studies, we showed that pathology signatures can be picked up from blood transcriptome and they are quite distinct in the avirulent P. chabaudi AS or virulent P. chabaudi CB infection[8]; further analysing the blood and spleen transcriptome from the avirulent P. chabaudi AS infection, we identified only a small set of immune genes shared between them[14]. Here we report a new dataset of spleen transcriptome from the virulent P. chabaudi CB infection, which were collected from the same mice as the published blood transcriptome[8]. Our datasets, including the published PcAS/PcCB blood[8], PcAS spleen[14] and this new PcCB spleen transcriptome, offer a unique possibility to identify the complete set of activated or suppressed genes during an acute blood stage infection, to infer their rates of change and their causal effects. Further, it would be of high interest to investigate whether the interaction between blood and spleen differ in these two infections or whether more subtle relationship can be unearthed using more elaborate time modeling methods.
Fig. 1

Sample collection and workflow. (a) Parasitemia (percentage of infected erythrocytes) of infected mice during the acute phase of blood stage infection and the time points (arrow heads) when the samples were collected. The mice were intraperitoneally infected with 105 erythrocytes that were infected with P. chabaudi parasite. (b) The flow chart illustrating the steps of microarray analysis.

Sample collection and workflow. (a) Parasitemia (percentage of infected erythrocytes) of infected mice during the acute phase of blood stage infection and the time points (arrow heads) when the samples were collected. The mice were intraperitoneally infected with 105 erythrocytes that were infected with P. chabaudi parasite. (b) The flow chart illustrating the steps of microarray analysis.

Methods

Mice and parasites

Female C57BL/6 aged 6–8 weeks from the SPF (Specific Pathogen Free) unit at the Francis Crick Institute Mill Hill Laboratory were housed under reverse light conditions (light 19.00–07.00, dark 07.00–19.00 GMT) at 20–22 °C, and were allowed access to diet and water ad libitum. This study was carried out in accordance with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (Home Office license 80/2538 and 70/8326), and was approved by the Francis Crick Institute Ethical Committee. Cloned lines of Plasmodium chabaudi chabaudi AS and CB were originally obtained from David Walliker, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Infections were initiated by intraperitoneal injection of 105 parasitised erythrocytes derived from cryopreserved stocks. The course of infection was monitored on Giemsa-stained thin blood films by enumerating the percentage of erythrocytes infected with asexual parasites (parasitemia). The limit of detection for patent parasitemia was 0.01% infected erythrocytes. During the experiments, mouse condition were closely monitored. Core body temperature was measured with an infrared surface thermometer (Fluke); body weight was calculated relative to a baseline measurement taken before infection; and erythrocyte density was determined on a VetScan HM5 haematology system (Abaxis). The animals were euthanized upon reaching humane end points by showing the following signs: emaciation (more than 25% weight loss), persistent labored breathing, severe hypothermia (body temperature below 28 °C), inability to remain upright when conscious or lack of natural functions, or continuous convulsions lasting more than 5 min.

RNA isolation and preparation for microarray analysis

The sample collection and processing workflow is summarised in Fig. 1. These methods are expanded versions of descriptions in our related studies[8,14]. Female C57BL/6 mice aged between 6–8 weeks were injected intraperitoneally with 105 infected red blood cells of P. chabaudi AS or CB strain. At 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 days post infection (dpi), 0.5 mL of blood was collected via cardiac puncture into 1 mL Tempus RNA stabilising solution (Applied Biosystems). Spleens were aseptically removed and were homogenised immediately in TRI reagent (Ambion) by pulsing with a Polytron homogenising unit (Kinematic). An extra day 9 group was collected from PcCB infected mice that had reached humane end points. Naïve control samples were also collected on day 0 (the day of infection) and day 12 (the end of the experiment). Samples were snap frozen in dry ice and stored at −80 °C until RNA isolation. Total blood RNA was extracted using PerfectPure RNA Blood Kit (5 PRIME), and Globin mRNA was removed from 2 µg of total isolated RNA using GLOBINclear 96-well Mouse/Rat Whole Blood Globin Reduction Kit (Ambion) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total splenic RNA was extracted using RiboPure RNA Purification Kit (Ambion) following the manufacture’s protocol. All RNA samples derived from the same experiment were isolated altogether at the end of the experiment, in 2–3 batches within a day. Globin mRNA reduction was performed in 2 batches, one for all PcAS blood samples and the other for all PcCB blood. Batch information for RNA isolation and subsequent processing was provided in Online-only Tables 1–4.
Online-only Table 1

Batch information, RNA quality and concentration and related GEO accession numbers for PcAS blood (GSE93631[19]).

Series GSE93631PRJNA361313Caliper LabChipNanodrop
GEO accession IDSample Name in GEOBeadChip No.RQSrRNA 28 s/18 s[ng/ul]260/280260/230RNA isolation batchGlobin mRNA reductioncRNA preparationBeadChip hybridasation
GSM2459164AS_naive_D0 rep 18762536135_E92.85147.72.12.2503/06/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459165AS_naive_D0 rep 28762536084_A8.22.27164.282.122.2403/06/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459166AS_naive_D0 rep 38762536052_F8.32.33244.742.12.2403/06/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459167AS_naive_D12 rep 18762536072_E8.22.18325.342.12.2203/06/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459168AS_naive_D12 rep 28784170061_E82.03372.42.082.2303/06/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459169AS_naive_D12 rep 38784170059_F8.32.13305.172.12.1703/06/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459170AS_D2 rep 18762536072_F8.72.58210.182.132.203/06/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459171AS_D2 rep 28762536084_B7.62.62343.312.092.2103/06/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459172AS_D2 rep 38762536135_C6.93.32269.342.12.2803/06/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459173AS_D2 rep 48784170059_C7.52.8504.892.172.2703/06/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459174AS_D4 rep 18762536052_B7.91.9314.442.122.2603/06/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459175AS_D4 rep 28762536084_F7.91.91315.672.12.2603/06/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459176AS_D4 rep 38784170061_A7.82.06258.92.142.2703/06/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459177AS_D6 rep 18762536052_E7.11.97658.792.252.3803/06/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459178AS_D6 rep 28762536135_A6.52.24737.492.232.3803/06/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459179AS_D6 rep 38784170059_B7.22.54669.172.282.4103/06/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459180AS_D8 rep 18762536084_D7.21.151112.82.182.2603/06/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459181AS_D8 rep 28762536135_F71.94415.42.192.403/06/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459182AS_D8 rep 38784170059_E7.43.35625.922.292.3903/06/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459183AS_D10 rep 18762536052_C7.90.182845.832.072.1603/06/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459184AS_D10 rep 28762536135_D7.80.213054.762.072.1603/06/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459185AS_D10 rep 38784170061_B7.70.223857.181.881.9503/06/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459186AS_D12 rep 18762536072_C7.40.944074.581.751.8203/06/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459187AS_D12 rep 28762536084_E7.20.973442.652.022.103/06/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459188AS_D12 rep 38784170061_C7.91.023104.62.052.1403/06/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
Online-only Table 4

Batch information, RNA quality and concentration and related GEO accession numbers for PcCB spleen (GSE145781[21]).

Series GSE145781PRJNA608201Caliper LabChipNanodrop
GEO accession IDSample Name in GEOBeadChip No.RINrRNA 28 s/18 s[ng/ul]260/280260/230RNA isolation batchcRNA preparationBeadChip hybridasation
GSM4332890Spleen, CB-Naïve-D0.rep19440690042_E8.010.69481.542.152.1906/12/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332891Spleen, CB-Naïve-D0.rep29440690065_D7.713.97503.422.192.2406/12/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332892Spleen, CB-naïve-D0.rep39440690046_F9.310.02390.792.152.2306/12/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332893Spleen, CB-Naïve-D12.rep19440690056_F7.61.46516.782.192.2806/12/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332894Spleen, CB-Naïve-D12.rep29440690059_B7.42.16501.912.172.1906/12/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332895Spleen, CB-Naïve-D12.rep39440690061_A8.13.47890.142.192.2606/12/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332896Spleen, CB-D2.rep19440690056_B8.53.48504.52.142.2506/12/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332897Spleen, CB-D2.rep29440690046_A8.22.29575.92.162.2406/12/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332898Spleen, CB-D2.rep39440690061_F8.03.04527.612.142.2306/12/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332899Spleen, CB-D2.rep49440690059_C8.12.24633.962.172.2506/12/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332900Spleen, CB-D4.rep19440690046_B8.02.291481.512.152.2806/12/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332901Spleen, CB-D4.rep29440690061_C7.13.931171.252.141.8406/12/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332902Spleen, CB-D4.rep39440690056_E7.93.29840.352.172.2406/12/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332903Spleen, CB-D4.rep49440690065_F7.72.141617.192.152.2706/12/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332904Spleen, CB-D6.rep19440690046_C8.98.891627.512.142.2206/12/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332905Spleen, CB-D6.rep29440690042_F7.49.012846.562.132.2306/12/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332906Spleen, CB-D6.rep39440690056_A8.04.391475.992.162.2506/12/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332907Spleen, CB-D6.rep49440690061_B7.72.732511.742.142.2306/12/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332908Spleen, CB-D8.rep19440690056_C7.63.142476.912.152.2206/12/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332909Spleen, CB-D8.rep29440690065_A8.43.423756.042.032.1306/12/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332910Spleen, CB-D8.rep39440690061_E8.23.381248.692.152.2206/12/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332911Spleen, CB-D8.rep49440690059_D8.23.222456.412.162.2406/12/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332912Spleen, CB-D9.rep19440690065_C8.12.721057.832.162.2206/12/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332913Spleen, CB-D9.rep29440690059_E7.92.263901.3122.1106/12/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332914Spleen, CB-D9.rep39440690061_D8.02.192278.082.152.2406/12/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332915Spleen, CB-D10.rep19440690065_E8.62.861628.22.172.2506/12/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332916Spleen, CB-D10.rep29440690056_D8.42.511162.552.172.2406/12/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332917Spleen, CB-D10.rep39440690046_E8.52.272509.682.152.2306/12/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332918Spleen, CB-D10.rep49440690059_A8.72.541224.362.182.2406/12/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332919Spleen, CB-D12.rep19440690059_F8.62.621172.012.172.2606/12/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332920Spleen, CB-D12.rep29440690046_D8.32.4909.932.192.2506/12/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM4332921Spleen, CB-D12.rep39440690065_B8.62.621047.022.182.2606/12/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batch
To test whether parasite RNA gives signals in microarray analysis of mouse gene expression, an independent experiment was performed using naïve and infected mouse blood RNA, and purified parasite RNA. RNA from naïve or infected blood was processed as described above. Parasite purification and RNA extraction methods were performed as described previously[17]. Briefly, infected blood collected at day 8 post infection were depleted of leukocytes by filtration through Plasmodipur filters (EuroProxima) followed by erythrocyte lysis using 0.15% saponin (Sigma) in ice-cold PBS and extensive washes with PBS. Purified parasite pellets were then resuspended in 1 ml TRI reagent (Ambion), snap-frozen on dry ice and kept at −80 °C. Parasite RNA was extracted using RiboPure RNA Purification Kit (Ambion) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Parasite RNA was also subjected to Globin mRNA removal. Batch information for RNA isolation and processing was provided in Online-only Table 5.
Online-only Table 5

Batch information, RNA quality and concentration and related GEO accession numbers for parasite RNA (GSE145634[22]).

Series GSE145634PRJNA607775BioanalyserNanodrop
GEO accession IDSample Name in GEOBeadChip No.RINrRNA 28 s/18 s[ng/ul]260/280260/230RNA isolation batchCommentsGlobin mRNA reductioncRNA preparationBeadChip hybridasation
GSM4322547naïve blood rep18697771087_A92.85147.72.12.2503/06/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM4322548Infected D8 rep18697771087_B71.94415.42.192.403/06/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM4322549Infected D8 rep28697771087_C7.21.151112.82.182.2603/06/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM4322550naïve blood rep28697771087_D8.32.33244.742.12.2403/06/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM4322551Infected D8 rep38697771087_F9.12.21050.822.152.4231/07/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM4322552Infected D8 rep48697771096_AN/A2.5667.162.222.5531/07/2013_Batch1Parasite rRNA detectedIn one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM4322553naïve blood rep38697771096_B8.22.27164.282.122.2403/06/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM4322554Parasite RNA rep18697771096_CN/A1.1351.092.142.3131/07/2013_Batch1Parasite rRNA detectedIn one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM4322555Infected D8 rep58697771096_D7.43.35625.922.292.3903/06/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM4322556Parasite RNA rep28697771096_EN/A0248.672.142.5431/07/2013_Batch1Parasite rRNA detectedIn one batchIn one batchIn one batch
Biotinylated, amplified antisense complement RNA (cRNA) samples were prepared from 300 ng of either globin reduced blood/parasite RNA, or splenic total RNA using Illumina TotalPrep RNA Amplification Kit (Ambion). cRNA was prepared in 4 batches: PcAS blood, PcCB blood, all spleen samples and blood/parasite RNA. At each step, the quantity of the RNA samples was measured using NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the quality of RNA was verified using Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies) or Caliper LabChip GX (Caliper Life Sciences), provided as RNA Integrity Number (RIN) or RNA Quality Score (RQS), respectively. Only RNA samples with RIN/RQS above 7 were used for subsequent treatment and analysis; however, for blood samples with high parasite load, parasite rRNA affected RIN/RQS determination, and the quality of these samples were determined by examining electropherograms. RNA concentration and RIN/RQS of each sample were also provided in Online-only Tables 1–5.

Microarray hybridisation and raw data export

The following procedures for microarray hybridisation and data acquisition was done for each sample. Briefly, 1.5 µg of labelled cRNA was hybridised to Illumina Mouse WG-6 v2.0 Expression BeadChip (consisting of 45,281 probe sets representing 30,854 genes) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The arrays were then washed, blocked, stained and scanned on an Illumina iScan, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Illumina BeadStudio/GenomeStudio 1.8.0 software was used to generate signal intensity values, quality control values, and to subtract background. Hybridisation was performed in 4 batches: PcAS blood, PcCB blood, all spleen samples and blood/parasite RNA.

Microarray data preparation and analysis

Data input, quality control, variance stabilisation, log transformation and quantile normalisation were performed using the lumi package[18]. The full feature set (a total of 45,281 probes) of each sample was used for the following analyses including hierarchical clustering, principle component analysis (PCA) and Euclidean distance, all conducted using R 3.6.0 (www.r-project.org). For hierarchical clustering, agglomerative clustering with average linkage was used.

Data Records

Gene expression data were deposited at the Gene Expression Omnibus database (GEO) under the following accession numbers: GSE93631[19] (AS and CB blood) and GSE123391[20] (AS spleen) which were published previously[8,14]; GSE145781[21] (CB spleen) and GSE145634[22] (the raw data of parasite RNA experiment) which were new datasets. GEO accession numbers of blood or spleen samples that were derived from the same mouse were provided in Tables 1 and 2. Batch information, RNA quality and concentration and related GEO accession numbers were provided in Online-only Tables 1–5.
Table 1

GEO accession numbers of blood or spleen samples that were derived the same PcAS infected mouse (Data Source: GSE93631[19] and GSE123391[20]).

mouse No.Blood (GSE93631[19])Spleen (GSE123391[20])
GEO accessionBeadChip No.GEO accessionBeadChip No.
naïve_D0_m1GSM24591648762536135_EGSM35025449440690022_B
naïve_D0_m2GSM24591658762536084_AGSM35025459440690030_C
naïve_D0_m3GSM24591668762536052_FGSM35025469440690035_B
naïve_D12_m1GSM24591678762536072_EGSM35025689440690030_F
naïve_D12_m2GSM24591688784170061_EGSM35025699440690037_C
naïve_D12_m3GSM24591698784170059_FGSM35025709440690042_A
AS_D2_m1GSM24591728762536135_CGSM35025479440690022_C
AS_D2_m2GSM24591718762536084_BGSM35025489440690035_A
AS_D2_m3GSM24591738784170059_CGSM35025499440690037_D
AS_D2_m4GSM24591708762536072_FGSM35025509440690042_C
AS_D4_m1N/AN/AGSM35025519440690022_D
AS_D4_m2GSM24591758762536084_FGSM35025529440690030_A
AS_D4_m3GSM24591748762536052_BGSM35025539440690037_E
AS_D4_m4GSM24591768784170061_AGSM35025549440690042_B
AS_D6_m1N/AN/AGSM35025559440690022_E
AS_D6_m2GSM24591778762536052_EGSM35025569440690035_C
AS_D6_m3GSM24591798784170059_BGSM35025579440690042_D
AS_D6_m4GSM24591788762536135_AGSM35025589440690037_A
AS_D8_m1GSM24591828784170059_EGSM35025599440690022_F
AS_D8_m2GSM24591818762536135_FGSM35025609440690030_B
AS_D8_m3GSM24591808762536084_DGSM35025619440690035_D
AS_D10_m1GSM24591858784170061_BGSM35025629440690035_E
AS_D10_m2GSM24591848762536135_DGSM35025639440690030_D
AS_D10_m3GSM24591838762536052_CGSM35025649440690037_F
AS_D12_m1GSM24591868762536072_CGSM35025659440690030_E
AS_D12_m2GSM24591888784170061_CGSM35025669440690035_F
AS_D12_m3GSM24591878762536084_EGSM35025679440690037_B
Table 2

GEO accession numbers of blood or spleen samples that were derived the same PcCB infected mouse (Data Source: GSE93631[19] and GSE145781[21]).

mouse No.Blood (GSE93631[19])Spleen (GSE145781[21])
GEO accessionBeadChip No.GEO accessionBeadChip No.
naïve_D0_m1GSM24591898762536055_DGSM43328909440690042_E
naïve_D0_m2GSM24591908762536056_EGSM43328919440690065_D
naïve_D0_m3GSM24591918762536079_EGSM43328929440690046_F
naïve_D12_m1GSM24591928762536054_FGSM43328939440690056_F
naïve_D12_m2GSM24591938762536055_EGSM43328949440690059_B
naïve_D12_m3GSM24591948762536056_AGSM43328959440690061_A
CB_D2_m1GSM24591958762536049_BGSM43328969440690056_B
CB_D2_m2GSM24591968762536054_CGSM43328979440690046_A
CB_D2_m3GSM24591978762536055_FGSM43328989440690061_F
CB_D2_m4GSM24591988762536079_CGSM43328999440690059_C
CB_D4_m1GSM24591998762536049_FGSM43329009440690046_B
CB_D4_m2GSM24592008762536054_DGSM43329019440690061_C
CB_D4_m3GSM24592018762536056_BGSM43329029440690056_E
CB_D4_m4GSM24592028762536078_AGSM43329039440690065_F
CB_D6_m1GSM24592068762536097_BGSM43329049440690046_C
CB_D6_m2GSM24592038762536055_AGSM43329059440690042_F
CB_D6_m3GSM24592048762536056_FGSM43329069440690056_A
CB_D6_m4GSM24592058762536079_AGSM43329079440690061_B
CB_D8_m1GSM24592078762536049_DGSM43329089440690056_C
CB_D8_m2GSM24592088762536054_EGSM43329099440690065_A
CB_D8_m3GSM24592098762536078_DGSM43329109440690061_E
CB_D8_m4GSM24592108762536097_FGSM43329119440690059_D
CB_D9_m1GSM24592218762536054_AGSM43329129440690065_C
CB_D9_m2GSM24592188762536055_BGSM43329139440690059_E
CB_D9_m3GSM24592198762536097_DN/AN/A
CB_D9_m4GSM24592208762536078_FGSM43329149440690061_D
CB_D10_m1GSM24592118762536049_CGSM43329159440690065_E
CB_D10_m2GSM24592128762536056_CGSM43329169440690056_D
CB_D10_m3GSM24592138762536078_BGSM43329179440690046_E
CB_D10_m4GSM24592148762536079_DGSM43329189440690059_A
CB_D12_m1GSM24592158762536049_EGSM43329199440690059_F
CB_D12_m2GSM24592168762536078_CGSM43329209440690046_D
CB_D12_m3GSM24592178762536079_BGSM43329219440690065_B
GEO accession numbers of blood or spleen samples that were derived the same PcAS infected mouse (Data Source: GSE93631[19] and GSE123391[20]). GEO accession numbers of blood or spleen samples that were derived the same PcCB infected mouse (Data Source: GSE93631[19] and GSE145781[21]).

Technical Validation

Sample preparations and quality control

Several aspects of the experiment were designed to ensure the quality of the data. For example, the control naïve mice were randomly selected from the same batch of age-matched mice, 3 of which were sacrificed at the same day of infection, and 3 of which were housed under the same conditions as the infected mice and were sacrificed along with mice after 12 days of infection. All mice in the infected group were infected at the same time and were randomly selected for sample collection at each time point. Overall, both blood and spleen samples collected from either PcAS or PcCB infections showed uniformed normalised intensities (Figs. 2a and 3a). Importantly, high similarities were observed between biological replicates (Figs. 2 and 3).
Fig. 2

Quality check of BeadChip gene expression data of PcAS blood samples. (a) Box plot showing distribution of 3,000 randomly sampled probe signals for normalised PcAS infected blood expression data. The median, two hinges, two whiskers and outlying points were shown. (b) Principal component analysis of normalised expression data of naïve and infected blood samples. (c) Hierarchical clustering plot of normalised intensity data among the samples was generated using agglomerative clustering with average linkage. (d) Heatmap of Euclidean distance. A full feature set was used for (b–d). This dataset was submitted to GEO (GSE93631).

Fig. 3

Quality check of BeadChip gene expression data of PcAS spleen samples.(a) Box plot showing distribution of 3,000 randomly sampled probe signals for normalised PcAS spleen expression data. The median, two hinges, two whiskers and outlying points were shown. (b) Principal component analysis of normalised expression data of naïve and infected spleen samples. (c) Hierarchical clustering plot of normalised intensity data among the samples was generated using agglomerative clustering with average linkage. (d) Heatmap of Euclidean distance. A full feature set was used for (b-d). This dataset was submitted to GEO (GSE123391).

Quality check of BeadChip gene expression data of PcAS blood samples. (a) Box plot showing distribution of 3,000 randomly sampled probe signals for normalised PcAS infected blood expression data. The median, two hinges, two whiskers and outlying points were shown. (b) Principal component analysis of normalised expression data of naïve and infected blood samples. (c) Hierarchical clustering plot of normalised intensity data among the samples was generated using agglomerative clustering with average linkage. (d) Heatmap of Euclidean distance. A full feature set was used for (b–d). This dataset was submitted to GEO (GSE93631). Quality check of BeadChip gene expression data of PcAS spleen samples.(a) Box plot showing distribution of 3,000 randomly sampled probe signals for normalised PcAS spleen expression data. The median, two hinges, two whiskers and outlying points were shown. (b) Principal component analysis of normalised expression data of naïve and infected spleen samples. (c) Hierarchical clustering plot of normalised intensity data among the samples was generated using agglomerative clustering with average linkage. (d) Heatmap of Euclidean distance. A full feature set was used for (b-d). This dataset was submitted to GEO (GSE123391).

Quality check of time dependent responses

In the naïve control group, mice collected at day 0 or day 12 clustered together in all 4 datasets. Interestingly, samples collected at 2 dpi at which time point the infection rate was below microscopic detection level, also cluster with naïve groups; and this was observed in both the blood and spleen in either infection (Figs. 2–5). In the avirulent PcAS infection, from day 4 onwards, the expression profiles changed significantly, showing clear time-dependent responses in both the blood and the spleen. At 4 dpi, spleen showing longer distance from the naïve groups than the blood, 46.4 vs 21.6 distance on PC2 (Figs. 2b and 3b), which indicates higher host responses in the spleen than in the blood. Similar responses took place in the virulent PcCB infection, showing 4 dpi-naïve distance on PC2 of 18.5 in the blood vs 32.0 in the spleen (Figs. 4b and 5b). This is in line with the current view that parasite-host interaction mainly take place in the spleen.
Fig. 5

Quality check of BeadChip gene expression data of PcCB spleen samples. (a) Box plot showing distribution of 3,000 randomly sampled probe signals for normalised PcCB spleen expression data. The median, two hinges, two whiskers and outlying points were shown. (b) Principal component analysis of normalised expression data of naïve and infected spleen samples. (c) Hierarchical clustering plot of normalised intensity data among the samples was generated using agglomerative clustering with average linkage. (d) Heatmap of Euclidean distance. A full feature set was used for (b-d). This dataset was submitted to GEO (GSE145781).

Fig. 4

Quality check of BeadChip gene expression data of PcCB blood samples. (a) Box plot showing distribution of 3,000 randomly sampled probe signals for normalised PcCB blood expression data. The median, two hinges, two whiskers and outlying points were shown. (b) Principal component analysis of normalised expression data of naïve and infected blood samples. (c) Hierarchical clustering plot of normalised intensity data among the samples was generated using agglomerative clustering with average linkage. (d) Heatmap of Euclidean distance. A full feature set was used for (b-d). This dataset was submitted to GEO (GSE93631).

Quality check of BeadChip gene expression data of PcCB blood samples. (a) Box plot showing distribution of 3,000 randomly sampled probe signals for normalised PcCB blood expression data. The median, two hinges, two whiskers and outlying points were shown. (b) Principal component analysis of normalised expression data of naïve and infected blood samples. (c) Hierarchical clustering plot of normalised intensity data among the samples was generated using agglomerative clustering with average linkage. (d) Heatmap of Euclidean distance. A full feature set was used for (b-d). This dataset was submitted to GEO (GSE93631). Quality check of BeadChip gene expression data of PcCB spleen samples. (a) Box plot showing distribution of 3,000 randomly sampled probe signals for normalised PcCB spleen expression data. The median, two hinges, two whiskers and outlying points were shown. (b) Principal component analysis of normalised expression data of naïve and infected spleen samples. (c) Hierarchical clustering plot of normalised intensity data among the samples was generated using agglomerative clustering with average linkage. (d) Heatmap of Euclidean distance. A full feature set was used for (b-d). This dataset was submitted to GEO (GSE145781). An interesting difference between the blood and spleen is the divergence between day 6 and 8 post infection. In the avirulent PcAS infection the distances between 6 and 8 dpi on PC1 were 36.4 in the blood and 91.8 in the spleen (Figs. 2b and 3b). This is slightly less striking in the virulent PcCB infection, with 21.1 in the blood and 66.8 in the spleen. These differences are also apparent in hierarchical clustering and heatmaps of euclidean distance (Figs. 2 and 3). The striking differences between PcAS and PcCB infections were the responses took place between day 10 and 12 post infection. In the avirulent PcAS infection, while day 10 and 12 were clearly different from previous infected samples, they clustered tightly together in both blood and spleen samples (Figs. 2b and 3b). By contrast, in the virulent PcCB infection the two days differed in both PC1 and PC2 (Figs. 4b and 5b), and the heatmaps of Euclidean distance showed that 12 dpi clearly separate from other samples (Figs. 4d and 5d).

Parasite RNA does not affect BeadChip gene expression results

Because the malaria parasite infects erythrocytes, RNA isolated from the infected blood contains both mouse and Plasmodium RNA. We therefore performed an independent experiment to rule out the interference of parasite RNA in downstream analysis using Mouse WG-6 v2.0 Expression BeadChip. We prepared purified P. chabaudi AS parasite RNA by passing infected blood through a leukocyte filter, usually removing more than 99% leukocytes, followed by erythrocyte lysis and extensive washes. Globin mRNA removal was also performed as for infected blood samples. As shown in Fig. 6, the numbers of detectable probes in parasite samples were significantly lower (Fig. 6a), and this hindered the normalisation step. Moreover, the non-normalised expression data of parasite samples showed very different density or cumulative density profiles (Fig. 6b,c). After removing parasite data from the dataset, the subsequent analyses can be easily performed and it was clear that the infected blood collected at 8 dpi significantly differed from naïve blood (Fig. 6d), validating our previous finding.
Fig. 6

Validation of parasite RNA does not affect BeadChip gene expression results. (a) Bar chart showing the number of probes detected in each sample. (b) Density plot of non-normalised expression data showing the signal density distribution. (c) Cumulative distribution function plot of non-normalised expression data of each sample. Arrowheads indicate parasite samples. (d) PCA plot of normalised expression data from infected and naïve blood samples after excluding parasite samples. This dataset was submitted to GEO (GSE145634).

Validation of parasite RNA does not affect BeadChip gene expression results. (a) Bar chart showing the number of probes detected in each sample. (b) Density plot of non-normalised expression data showing the signal density distribution. (c) Cumulative distribution function plot of non-normalised expression data of each sample. Arrowheads indicate parasite samples. (d) PCA plot of normalised expression data from infected and naïve blood samples after excluding parasite samples. This dataset was submitted to GEO (GSE145634).

Usage Notes

One major advantage of this study is that we collected both the blood and spleen simultaneously from the same mouse (GEO accession numbers of blood or spleen samples that were derived from the same mouse were provided in Tables 1 and 2) throughout the acute phase of blood stage infection, from as early as day 2 post infection when the infection rate was below microscopic detection, till day 12 post infection when the parasite load was controlled. Moreover, the samples were collected at 2-day intervals to allow a more detailed analysis of the time-dependent transcriptional changes. It is hoped that this will facilitate the users to investigate in detail the interaction between the blood and the spleen. It would also provide some answers to the question of whether some of the responses in the blood happen before or after the spleen responses, for example using time series modelling. And importantly, we collected samples from both the virulent PcCB and the avirulent PcAS infections. It would be of high interest to investigate whether the interaction between blood and spleen differ in these two infections.
Measurement(s)transcriptome • gene expression • malaria
Technology Type(s)Microarray
Factor Type(s)blood versus spleen • virulent versus avirulent malaria infection
Sample Characteristic - OrganismMus musculus
Online-only Table 2

Batch information, RNA quality and concentration and related GEO accession numbers for PcCB blood (GSE93631[19]).

Series GSE93631PRJNA361313BioanalyserNanodrop
GEO accession IDSample Name in GEOBeadChip No.RINrRNA 28 s/18 s[ng/ul]260/280260/230RNA isolation batchCommentsGlobin mRNA reductioncRNA preparationBeadChip hybridasation
GSM2459189CB_naive_D0 rep 18762536055_D9.51.9317.82.112.216/10/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459190CB_naive_D0 rep 28762536056_E9.31.7248.72.052.216/10/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459191CB_naive_D0 rep 38762536079_E9.41.6251.472.042.2216/10/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459192CB_naive_D12 rep 18762536054_F9.91.9331.232.12.216/10/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459193CB_naive_D12 rep 28762536055_E9.11.6331.112.112.2716/10/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459194CB_naive_D12 rep 38762536056_A9.61.9537.732.112.2116/10/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459195CB_D2 rep 18762536049_B9.41.8324.982.112.2916/10/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459196CB_D2 rep 28762536054_C9.72334.512.132.2416/10/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459197CB_D2 rep 38762536055_F9.41.7285.152.132.2816/10/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459198CB_D2 rep 48762536079_C9.21.7210.812.122.2216/10/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459199CB_D4 rep 18762536049_F9.62.4437.072.112.2516/10/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459200CB_D4 rep 28762536054_D9.52.5237.532.12.2316/10/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459201CB_D4 rep 38762536056_B102.1295.062.082.1516/10/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459202CB_D4 rep 48762536078_A102.1245.022.082.2516/10/2013_Batch1In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459203CB_D6 rep 18762536055_AN/A0.9819.772.262.5516/10/2013_Batch1Parasite rRNA detectedIn one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459204CB_D6 rep 28762536056_FN/A1.3821.732.312.5916/10/2013_Batch1Parasite rRNA detectedIn one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459205CB_D6 rep 38762536079_AN/A1.7427.122.172.4216/10/2013_Batch1Parasite rRNA detectedIn one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459206CB_D6 rep 48762536097_BN/A0.6713.052.292.5816/10/2013_Batch1Parasite rRNA detectedIn one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459207CB_D8 rep 18762536049_DN/A1.61512.022.22.5616/10/2013_Batch3Parasite rRNA detectedIn one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459208CB_D8 rep 28762536054_EN/A1.2635.792.342.616/10/2013_Batch3Parasite rRNA detectedIn one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459209CB_D8 rep 38762536078_DN/A1.1927.22.222.5916/10/2013_Batch3Parasite rRNA detectedIn one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459210CB_D8 rep 48762536097_FN/A1.41145.572.252.5616/10/2013_Batch3Parasite rRNA detectedIn one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459211CB_D10 rep 18762536049_C102.11004.022.132.1816/10/2013_Batch3In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459212CB_D10 rep 28762536056_C1021969.422.12.2216/10/2013_Batch3In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459213CB_D10 rep 38762536078_B102.13733.011.931.9816/10/2013_Batch3In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459214CB_D10 rep 48762536079_D102.12197.772.092.1816/10/2013_Batch3In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459215CB_D12 rep 18762536049_E9.91.84052.151.771.8416/10/2013_Batch3In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459216CB_D12 rep 28762536078_C9.81.44284.331.521.5616/10/2013_Batch3In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459217CB_D12 rep 38762536079_B9.91.92436.882.092.2116/10/2013_Batch3In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459218CB_D9 rep 18762536055_B102.5825.612.112.2616/10/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459219CB_D9 rep 28762536097_D102.11264.372.12.2216/10/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459220CB_D9 rep 38762536078_F102.3675.762.122.2516/10/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
GSM2459221CB_D9 rep 48762536054_A102.4416.62.12.2416/10/2013_Batch2In one batchIn one batchIn one batch
Online-only Table 3

Batch information, RNA quality and concentration and related GEO accession numbers for PcAS spleen (GSE123391[20]).

Series GSE123391PRJNA508619Caliper LabChipNanodrop
GEO accession IDSample Name in GEOBeadChip No.RQSrRNA 28 s/18 s[ng/ul]260/280260/230RNA isolation batchcRNA preparationBeadChip hybridasation
GSM3502544AS-naive-day0-rep19440690022_B7.62.66678.782.072.3131/05/2013_batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502545AS-naive-day0-rep29440690030_C8.22.79530.392.082.3231/05/2013_batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502546AS-naive-day0-rep39440690035_B8.62.13605.412.092.3231/05/2013_batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502568AS-naive-day12-rep19440690030_F8.72.35647.282.112.3131/05/2013_batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502569AS-naive-day12-rep29440690037_C8.42.34703.112.132.3131/05/2013_batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502570AS-naive-day12-rep39440690042_A8.42.4677.792.132.3331/05/2013_batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502547AS-infected-day2-rep19440690022_C8.43.93593.212.152.3231/05/2013_batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502548AS-infected-day2-rep29440690035_A8.13.4523.122.152.3131/05/2013_batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502549AS-infected-day2-rep39440690037_D7.14.38794.012.112.3131/05/2013_batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502550AS-infected-day2-rep49440690042_C8.42.33579.892.112.3431/05/2013_batch1In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502551AS-infected-day4-rep19440690022_D7.23.89854.392.112.3131/05/2013_batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502552AS-infected-day4-rep29440690030_A8.53.13711.792.092.3131/05/2013_batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502553AS-infected-day4-rep39440690037_E8.23.361042.22.12.3131/05/2013_batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502554AS-infected-day4-rep49440690042_B8.82.66970.622.12.3131/05/2013_batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502555AS-infected-day6-rep19440690022_E6.94.471283.882.112.2931/05/2013_batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502556AS-infected-day6-rep29440690035_C7.42.461766.582.112.2831/05/2013_batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502557AS-infected-day6-rep39440690042_D7.92.392096.842.12.2731/05/2013_batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502558AS-infected-day6-rep49440690037_A8.22.572006.022.12.2531/05/2013_batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502559AS-infected-day8-rep19440690022_F7.70.982670.242.072.231/05/2013_batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502560AS-infected-day8-rep39440690030_B7.80.942911.042.052.1831/05/2013_batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502561AS-infected-day8-rep49440690035_D7.81.322911.332.042.1731/05/2013_batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502562AS-infected-day10-rep19440690035_E7.81.293279.662.012.1131/05/2013_batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502563AS-infected-day10-rep29440690030_D7.71.33418.21.982.0831/05/2013_batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502564AS-infected-day10-rep39440690037_F7.81.273034.672.032.1331/05/2013_batch2In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502565AS-infected-day12-rep29440690030_E8.52.332993.752.042.1731/05/2013_batch3In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502566AS-infected-day12-rep39440690035_F8.42.211799.392.092.2531/05/2013_batch3In one batchIn one batch
GSM3502567AS-infected-day12-rep49440690037_B8.62.172257.282.072.2331/05/2013_batch3In one batchIn one batch
  18 in total

Review 1.  Pathogenesis of malaria-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Philippe E Van den Steen; Katrien Deroost; Julie Deckers; Evelien Van Herck; Sofie Struyf; Ghislain Opdenakker
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2013-06-03

2.  Hemozoin induces lung inflammation and correlates with malaria-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Katrien Deroost; Ariane Tyberghein; Natacha Lays; Sam Noppen; Evelin Schwarzer; Els Vanstreels; Mina Komuta; Mauro Prato; Jing-Wen Lin; Ana Pamplona; Chris J Janse; Paolo Arese; Tania Roskams; Dirk Daelemans; Ghislain Opdenakker; Philippe E Van den Steen
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.914

Review 3.  Systems Biology-Based Investigation of Host-Plasmodium Interactions.

Authors:  Maren L Smith; Mark P Styczynski
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2018-05-18

Review 4.  Innate sensing of malaria parasites.

Authors:  Ricardo T Gazzinelli; Parisa Kalantari; Katherine A Fitzgerald; Douglas T Golenbock
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 108.555

5.  Sequestration and histopathology in Plasmodium chabaudi malaria are influenced by the immune response in an organ-specific manner.

Authors:  Thibaut Brugat; Deirdre Cunningham; Jan Sodenkamp; Stephanie Coomes; Mark Wilson; Philip J Spence; William Jarra; Joanne Thompson; Cheryl Scudamore; Jean Langhorne
Journal:  Cell Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.715

6.  Genomic and transcriptomic comparisons of closely related malaria parasites differing in virulence and sequestration pattern.

Authors:  Jing-Wen Lin; Adam J Reid; Deirdre Cunningham; Ulrike Böhme; Irene Tumwine; Sara Keller-Mclaughlin; Mandy Sanders; Matthew Berriman; Jean Langhorne
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2018-12-06

7.  Stuck in a rut? Reconsidering the role of parasite sequestration in severe malaria syndromes.

Authors:  Aubrey J Cunnington; Eleanor M Riley; Michael Walther
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2013-11-05

8.  Signatures of malaria-associated pathology revealed by high-resolution whole-blood transcriptomics in a rodent model of malaria.

Authors:  Jing-Wen Lin; Jan Sodenkamp; Deirdre Cunningham; Katrien Deroost; Tshibuayi Christine Tshitenge; Sarah McLaughlin; Tracey J Lamb; Bradley Spencer-Dene; Caroline Hosking; Jai Ramesar; Chris J Janse; Christine Graham; Anne O'Garra; Jean Langhorne
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Transcriptomic Studies of Malaria: a Paradigm for Investigation of Systemic Host-Pathogen Interactions.

Authors:  Hyun Jae Lee; Athina Georgiadou; Thomas D Otto; Michael Levin; Lachlan J Coin; David J Conway; Aubrey J Cunnington
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 11.056

10.  Comparison of whole blood and spleen transcriptional signatures over the course of an experimental malaria infection.

Authors:  Carlos Talavera-López; Yaw Bediako; Jing-Wen Lin; John Joseph Valletta; Mario Recker; Jean Langhorne
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Genomic Epidemiology of Antimalarial Drug Resistance in Plasmodium falciparum in Southern China.

Authors:  Fang Huang; Christopher G Jacob; Shannon Takala-Harrison; Matthew Adams; Heng-Lin Yang; Hui Liu; Zhi-Gui Xia; Shui-Sen Zhou; Lin-Hua Tang; Christopher V Plowe
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 5.293

2.  Tamoxifen Suppresses the Immune Response to Plasmodium berghei ANKA and Exacerbates Symptomatology.

Authors:  Luis Antonio Cervantes-Candelas; Jesús Aguilar-Castro; Fidel Orlando Buendía-González; Omar Fernández-Rivera; Armando Cervantes-Sandoval; Jorge Morales-Montor; Martha Legorreta-Herrera
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-06-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.