| Literature DB >> 32752200 |
Elena Lantero1,2, Jessica Fernandes3, Carlos Raúl Aláez-Versón4, Joana Gomes3, Henrique Silveira3, Fatima Nogueira3, Xavier Fernàndez-Busquets1,2,5.
Abstract
Innovative antimalarial strategies are urgently needed given the alarming evolution of resistance to every single drug developed against Plasmodium parasites. The sulfated glycosaminoglycan heparin has been delivered in membrane feeding assays together with Plasmodium berghei-infected blood to Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes. The transition between ookinete and oocyst pathogen stages in the mosquito has been studied in vivo through oocyst counting in dissected insect midguts, whereas ookinete interactions with heparin have been followed ex vivo by flow cytometry. Heparin interferes with the parasite's ookinete-oocyst transition by binding ookinetes, but it does not affect fertilization. Hypersulfated heparin is a more efficient blocker of ookinete development than native heparin, significantly reducing the number of oocysts per midgut when offered to mosquitoes at 5 µg/mL in membrane feeding assays. Direct delivery of heparin to mosquitoes might represent a new antimalarial strategy of rapid implementation, since it would not require clinical trials for its immediate deployment.Entities:
Keywords: Anopheles; Plasmodium; antimalarial drugs; heparin; malaria; mosquito; ookinete; transmission blocking
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32752200 PMCID: PMC7463908 DOI: 10.3390/biom10081136
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Heparin-Cy5 binding to ookinetes. (a) Flow cytometry plot showing heparin-Cy5 signal in green fluorescent protein (GFP)-expressing P. berghei ookinetes. GFP-negative events correspond mostly to red blood cells (see Figure S1 for gating strategy). c1 to c4 refer to the individual events reported in panel c. (b) Difference in Cy5 median intensity between GFP-expressing ookinetes and GFP-negative cells. (c) Fluorescence images of the flow cytometry events indicated in panel a. The merges of the bright field (BF) image with the fluorescence of heparin, nuclei, GFP, and all three of them, are indicated as merge-1 to merge-4, respectively. Size bars represent 7 µm.
Figure 2Effect on ookinete development of heparin fed to mosquitoes by sugar meal. (a,c) Fluorescence detection in (a) intact abdomen and (c) dissected midgut of heparin-Cy5 fed to A. stephensi female mosquitoes in a sugar meal. (b,d) Bright field images of the microscope fields in panels a and c, respectively. (e) Depiction of the method for sugar feed used in mosquito assays. (f) Effect on parasite development of heparin delivered by sugar swaps. ns: not significant.
Figure 3Effect on ookinete development of heparin fed to mosquitoes by membrane feeding assay (MFA). (a–d) Fluorescence detection of heparin-Cy5 fed to A. stephensi female mosquitoes by blood feed. (a,b) Whole dissected midgut and (c,d) magnification of the same midgut with the blood bolus pushed away. (b,d) Bright field images of the microscope fields in panels a and c, respectively. (e) Depiction of the MFA method used in mosquito assays. (f) Effect on parasite development of non-modified heparin delivered by MFA. (g) Effect on parasite development of hypersulfated heparin delivered by MFA. ns: not significant. (h–k) Fluorescence images of representative mosquito midguts from the MFA 500 µg/mL non-modified heparin group (h,i) and from the MFA control group (j,k); the fluorescence signal is shown alone (i,k) and merged with bright field images of the midgut contours (h,j).
Figure 4Effect of heparin in the ex vivo development of ookinetes. (a) Depiction of the method used for the ex vivo growth of ookinetes. The parasite development scheme has been adapted from Kuehn and Pradel [20]. (b) Effect of heparin on ex vivo ookinete maturation analyzed by flow cytometry (see Figure S4 and Table S1). ns: not significant.