| Literature DB >> 30231167 |
Luciana Dos Santos Dias1, Luíz Guilherme Soares da Rocha Bauzer1, José Bento Pereira Lima1.
Abstract
Culicidae colonization in laboratory is paramount to conduct studies aiming at a better understanding of mosquitoes' capacity to transmit pathogens that cause deadly diseases. Colonization requires female blood feeding, a necessary step for maturation of female's oocytes. Direct blood feeding on anesthetized mammals implies in a number of disadvantages when compared to artificial blood feeding. Consequently, laboratories worldwide have been trying to -feed female mosquitoes artificially in order to replace direct feeding. In this study, we compared the effects of direct blood feeding and artificial blood feeding on important life traits of three Culicidae species. Artificial feeding was performed using citrated or defibrinated sheep blood and citrated or defibrinated rabbit blood. Direct feeding was performed using anesthetized guinea pigs as the blood source and the experiment control. Results indicated that artificial feeding using sheep blood was not good enough to justify its use in the maintenance of laboratory colonies of Culicidae. However, artificial feeding using rabbit blood maintained a recovery rate always very close to the control, especially when blood was citrated. We concluded that artificial feeding using citrated rabbit blood can substitute direct feeding on mammals reducing the use of animals, eliminating the need to maintain a bioterium in the laboratory and reducing costs in scientific researches involving Culicidae vectors.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30231167 PMCID: PMC6169092 DOI: 10.1590/s1678-9946201860045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo ISSN: 0036-4665 Impact factor: 1.846
Figure 1Apparatus used for artificial feeding: A) Parafilm-M® roll; B) Jacketed glass with conical bottom; C) Artificial feeding using circulating water bath to maintain the blood warm; D) Cage top view during artificial feeding of Culicidae
Figure 2Parafilm preparation scheme for artificial feeding: A) Parafilm before stretching measuring 5 x 5 cm; B) Initial procedure of the parafilm stretching process leading to the measurement of 5 x 15 cm; C) Final procedure of the parafilm stretching process in the second direction leading to the measurement of 15 x 15 cm; D) Display of the parafilm after the first stretching measuring 5 x 15 cm
Figure 3Feeding cage with a movable bottom: A) External view of the feed cage with distended bottom; B) Inside view of the feed cage with distended bottom; C) External view of the feed cage with suspended bottom; D) Internal view of the feed cage with suspended bottom
Figure 4Percentage of females artificially fed in the different evaluated conditions and in the direct feeding on guinea pig. A- Ae. aegypti, B- Cx. quinquefasciatus and C- An. aquasalis. Bars followed by the letter a represent no significant difference compared with guinea pig; bars followed by the letter b represent significant difference compared with guinea pig; bars followed by the letter c represent no significant difference among the other sources of blood in artificial feeding; bars followed by letter d represent significant difference among the other sources of blood in artificial feeding. One-way Anova corrected by Tukey test
Mean weight and ratio of ingested blood of Ae. aegypti, Cx. quinquefasciatus and An. Aquasalis females exposed to direct (guinea pig) or artificial (sheep and rabbit) blood feeding
| Species | Blood meals | Weight | Ratio of ingested blood |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Unfed | 17,2 | - |
| Live guinea pig | 53,9 | 3,1 | |
| Citrated sheep blood | 45,8 | 2,7 | |
| Defibrinated sheep blood | 37,0 | 2,1 | |
| Citrated rabbit blood | 37,4 | 2,2 | |
| Defibrinated rabbit blood | 40,2 | 2,3 | |
|
| Unfed | 17,2 | - |
| Live guinea pig | 35,7 | 2,1 | |
| Citrated sheep blood | 31,7 | 1,8 | |
| Defibrinated sheep blood | 27,3 | 1,6 | |
| Citrated rabbit blood | 33 | 1,9 | |
| Defibrinated rabbit blood | 30,0 | 1,7 | |
|
| Unfed | 14,2 | - |
| Live guinea pig | 33,6 | 2,4 | |
| Citrated sheep blood | 26,7 | 1,9 | |
| Defibrinated sheep blood | 26,7 | 1,9 | |
| Citrated rabbit blood | 22,8 | 1,6 | |
| Defibrinated rabbit blood | 24,2 | 1,7 |
Ratio of ingested blood calculated by dividing the mean weight of groups of 10 fed mosquitoes (under different feeding conditions) by the mean weight of groups of 10 unfed mosquitoes. Student t test analysis
= Significant difference compared with the weight of unfed females of the same species;
= Significant difference compared with the guinea pig;
= No significant difference when compared with direct feeding on guinea pig;
= No significant difference when compared with another artificial feeding condition
Figure 5Mean number of eggs laid per female from artificial feeding under the different evaluated conditions and from direct feeding in guinea pig. A- Ae. aegypti, B- Cx. quinquefasciatus and C- An. aquasalis. Bars followed by the letter b represent significant difference with respect to the guinea pig; bars followed by the letter c represent no significant difference between the other sources of blood in artificial feeding; bars followed by the letter d represent significant difference between the other sources of blood in artificial feeding. One-way Anova correction by Tukey test
Figure 6Average percentage of eggs hatching from artificially fed females under the different evaluated conditions and from females directly fed on guinea pig. A- Ae. aegypti, B- Cx. quinquefasciatus and C- An. aquasalis. Bars followed by the letter a represent significant difference with respect to the guinea pig. Bars followed by the letter b represent no significant difference between them. One-way Anova correction by Tukey test