| Literature DB >> 32751814 |
Anthony D Tercero1, Sean P Place1.
Abstract
The suborder Notothenioidae is comprised of Antarctic fishes, several of which have lost their ability to rapidly upregulate heat shock proteins in response to thermal stress, instead adopting a pattern of expression resembling constitutive genes. Given the cold-denaturing effect that sub-zero waters have on proteins, evolution in the Southern Ocean has likely selected for increased expression of molecular chaperones. These selective pressures may have also enabled retention of gene duplicates, bolstering quantitative output of cytosolic heat shock proteins (HSPs). Given that newly duplicated genes are under more relaxed selection, it is plausible that gene duplication enabled altered regulation of such highly conserved genes. To test for evidence of gene duplication, copy number of various isoforms within major heat shock gene families were characterized via qPCR and compared between the Antarctic notothen, Trematomus bernacchii, which lost the inducible heat shock response, and the non-Antarctic notothen, Notothenia angustata, which maintains an inducible heat shock response. The results indicate duplication of isoforms within the hsp70 and hsp40 super families have occurred in the genome of T. bernacchii. The findings suggest gene duplications may have been critical in maintaining protein folding efficiency in the sub-zero waters and provided an evolutionary mechanism of alternative regulation of these conserved gene families.Entities:
Keywords: cellular stress; gene duplication; heat shock proteins; molecular chaperones; notothenioid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32751814 PMCID: PMC7466066 DOI: 10.3390/genes11080867
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
PCR primers used for cloning. In all instances, each primer set works on both T. bernacchii (T.b.) and N. angustata (N.a.) genomic DNA.
| Species Specificity | Gene Target | F’ Primer Sequence | R’ Primer Sequence |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5-TGCTTCGTCAGGGTTGATAC-3 | 5-GAAAGACATCAGCGACAACAAG-3 | |
|
| 5-CCGAGATGCCCTGTCAATAAA-3 | 5-TGCTGGTTCATGGAGCTATTC-3 | |
|
| 5-TCAAGTCGGGAGAACGAAAC-3 | 5-CTCATCTGGGTTGATGCTCTT-3 | |
|
| 5-CCTGCTTACAGCACTACCATA-3 | 5-GAGCTCCTCACAAGGAAGATAAA-3 | |
|
| 5-ACGTTGCATGTCGCTAGAGT-3 | 5-GGCCAGGATAACGGAACCAA-3 | |
|
| 5-GACCAAAGCCGACCTGATTA-3 | 5-TCTCTTCCTTCTCCTCCTTCTC-3 | |
|
| 5-CAGTACGGCTGGTCTGGAAA-3 | 5-TCCTCTCTCCGTAGGCCTTG-3 | |
|
| 5-GGACTAGTGGGTGTTGGATAAG-3 | 5-GTGTTAAAGGTGGGACAGTTTG-3 |
Quantitative-PCR primers and amplification efficiencies E (AMP) given for genomic and plasmid DNA. Primers with * were tested with DMSO additives to reduce suspected secondary structure formation.
| Species | Gene Target | F’ Sequence | R’ Sequence | E(AMP) gDNA | E(AMP) pDNA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5-TCTTATTGAGTTCCTTGCCGC-3 | 5-CGACATTGTCCTGGTGGGAG-3 | 1.97 | 1.96 | |
|
| 5-GAGGCTGAAGTGAGACCTAAAG-3 | 5-GCAGGCTTCCACAAATTTCAT-3 | 1.96 | 1.95 | |
|
| 5-AGGGCGTCGACTTTTACACC-3 | 5-GGCTTTCTCCACAGGTTCCA-3 | 1.94 | 1.97 | |
|
| 5-AAGGCGTATCACCTCTCAGAC-3 | 5-TTTCTGGGGTTGTATAGAGCGA-3 | 1.96 | 2.01 | |
|
| 5-ATTACCCAGCATCCACAGGG-3 | 5-TGACAGCTGTGTGATGCGAAA-3 | 2.00 | 2.00 | |
|
| 5-CTTCTCCTCCTGCTTCTTCTTC-3 | 5-GAAGGAGTTTGATGGCAAGAAC-3 | 2.01 | 1.95 | |
|
| 5-GATGACCATACGGCGTCAGA-3 | 5-TCCTCTCTCCGTAGGCCTTG-3 | 1.91 | 1.90 | |
|
| 5-CAGACCCTGCAAAAGACGGA-3 | 5-AATGACCACGACGGACACTT-3 | 1.96 | 2.04 | |
|
| 5-GCCTGTGGAAAAGGCTCTCC-3 | 5-CAGCAGCTTTTGGATCTTGGG-3 | 1.91 | 2.05 | |
|
| 5-CCTTCATTTAGCAGGCTTCCACA-3 | 5-CCCATCCAGGAGAGGTACAC-3 | 1.90 | 1.94 | |
|
| 5-CGAGGGCGTCGACTTTTACA-3 | 5-TCCATTTTGGCGTCCCTCAG-3 | 1.90 | 1.93 | |
|
| 5-AGGCGTATCACCTCTCAGAC-3 | 5-ATCTGAAGCAAAGAAGATGCAAT-3 | 1.90 | 1.90 | |
|
| 5-ACACGTCAACATTGCATGGC-3 | 5-ACGTTGCATGTCGCTAGAGT-3 | 1.94 | 1.92 | |
|
| 5-CATGAAAGGCCTTAGTGCCG-3 | 5-GATTTAACAAACCTGGGTACCATC-3 | 1.95 | 1.94 | |
|
| 5-GATGACCATACGGCGTCAGA-3 | 5-TCCTCTCTCCGTAGGCCTTG-3 | 1.95 | 1.92 | |
| 5-ATGACCACGACGGACACTTG-3 | 5-CAGACCCTGCAAAAGACGGA-3 | 1.94 | 1.94 |
Figure 1Comparison of estimated gene copy number of the hsp40 isoform dnaja3. Average copy number is estimated to be 1.92 copies per haploid genome in T. bernacchii (blue) and 0.875 copies per haploid genome in N. angustata (orange). A highly significant difference between the two means was observed (p < 0.00005). Box and whiskers represent quartile ranges with circles representing outliers.
Figure 2Comparison of estimated gene copy number of two isoforms within the hsp90 gene family. The average copy number of ancestrally constitutive isoform hsp90ab1 was determined to be 1.07 copies per T. bernacchii genome (blue) and 1.01 copies per N. angustata genome (orange). Within the inducible isoform hsp90b1, T. bernacchii had an average of 1.1 copies and N. angustata had an average of 1.14 copies per haploid genome. No significant difference in average copy number was observed between species for either of the two isoforms. Box and whiskers represent quartile ranges with circles representing outliers.
Figure 3Comparisons of gene copy number of five isoforms within the hsp70 superfamily in T. bernacchii (blue) and N. angustata (orange). For the major ancestrally constitutive isoform hsc71, a non-significant difference in average gene copy number was determined to be 1.1 copies in T. bernacchii and 1.2 copies in N. angustata. Isoforms hspa4b and hspa13 in T. bernacchii displayed evidence of gene duplication with an average copy number of 1.76 and 3.1 copies, respectively. Significant differences in gene copy number were observed with N. angustata having an average of 1.12 copies of hspa4b per genome (p < 0.05) and 0.92 copies of hspa13 per genome (p < 0.00005). No significant difference in gene copy number was observed for ancestrally inducible isoforms hspa6 and hspa12a with T. bernacchii carrying an average of 1.04 and 0.97 copies per genome respectively, and N. angustata carrying an average of 1.09 and 1.36 copies per genome, respectively. Box and whiskers represent quartile ranges with circles representing outliers.