Literature DB >> 22492459

Simple absolute quantification method correcting for quantitative PCR efficiency variations for microbial community samples.

Robert Brankatschk1, Natacha Bodenhausen, Josef Zeyer, Helmut Bürgmann.   

Abstract

Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) is a widely used technique in microbial community analysis, allowing the quantification of the number of target genes in a community sample. Currently, the standard-curve (SC) method of absolute quantification is widely employed for these kinds of analysis. However, the SC method assumes that the amplification efficiency (E) is the same for both the standard and the sample target template. We analyzed 19 bacterial strains and nine environmental samples in qPCR assays, targeting the nifH and 16S rRNA genes. The E values of the qPCRs differed significantly, depending on the template. This has major implications for the quantification. If the sample and standard differ in their E values, quantification errors of up to orders of magnitude are possible. To address this problem, we propose and test the one-point calibration (OPC) method for absolute quantification. The OPC method corrects for differences in E and was derived from the ΔΔC(T) method with correction for E, which is commonly used for relative quantification in gene expression studies. The SC and OPC methods were compared by quantifying artificial template mixtures from Geobacter sulfurreducens (DSM 12127) and Nostoc commune (Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa [CCAP] 1453/33), which differ in their E values. While the SC method deviated from the expected nifH gene copy number by 3- to 5-fold, the OPC method quantified the template mixtures with high accuracy. Moreover, analyzing environmental samples, we show that even small differences in E between the standard and the sample can cause significant differences between the copy numbers calculated by the SC and the OPC methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22492459      PMCID: PMC3370567          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.07878-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  46 in total

1.  Improvement in the RFLP procedure for studying the diversity of nifH genes in communities of nitrogen fixers in soil.

Authors:  F Poly; L J Monrozier; R Bally
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.992

2.  A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR.

Authors:  M W Pfaffl
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Real-time PCR in virology.

Authors:  Ian M Mackay; Katherine E Arden; Andreas Nitsche
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Improved culturability of soil bacteria and isolation in pure culture of novel members of the divisions Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia.

Authors:  Peter H Janssen; Penelope S Yates; Bronwyn E Grinton; Paul M Taylor; Michelle Sait
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  A new quantitative method of real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay based on simulation of polymerase chain reaction kinetics.

Authors:  Weihong Liu; David A Saint
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 3.365

6.  Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data.

Authors:  Christian Ramakers; Jan M Ruijter; Ronald H Lekanne Deprez; Antoon F M Moorman
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2003-03-13       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Experimental validation of novel and conventional approaches to quantitative real-time PCR data analysis.

Authors:  Stuart N Peirson; Jason N Butler; Russell G Foster
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Biodiversity of denitrifying and dinitrogen-fixing bacteria in an acid forest soil.

Authors:  Christopher Rösch; Alexander Mergel; Hermann Bothe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Metaproteogenomic analysis of microbial communities in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of rice.

Authors:  Claudia Knief; Nathanaël Delmotte; Samuel Chaffron; Manuel Stark; Gerd Innerebner; Reiner Wassmann; Christian von Mering; Julia A Vorholt
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 10.302

10.  Analysis of the chromosome sequence of the legume symbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti strain 1021.

Authors:  D Capela; F Barloy-Hubler; J Gouzy; G Bothe; F Ampe; J Batut; P Boistard; A Becker; M Boutry; E Cadieu; S Dréano; S Gloux; T Godrie; A Goffeau; D Kahn; E Kiss; V Lelaure; D Masuy; T Pohl; D Portetelle; A Pühler; B Purnelle; U Ramsperger; C Renard; P Thébault; M Vandenbol; S Weidner; F Galibert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  43 in total

1.  Quantification of diverse virus populations in the environment using the polony method.

Authors:  Nava Baran; Svetlana Goldin; Ilia Maidanik; Debbie Lindell
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 17.745

2.  Degradation and half-life of DNA present in biomass from a genetically-modified organism during land application.

Authors:  Mathew C Halter; James A Zahn
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  The Use of Degenerate Primers in qPCR Analysis of Functional Genes Can Cause Dramatic Quantification Bias as Revealed by Investigation of nifH Primer Performance.

Authors:  John Christian Gaby; Daniel H Buckley
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Error estimation in environmental DNA targets quantification due to PCR efficiencies differences between real samples and standards.

Authors:  Leonardo Martín Pérez; Mariana Fittipaldi; Bárbara Adrados; Jordi Morató; Francesc Codony
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 2.099

5.  Air-sampled Filter Analysis for Endotoxins and DNA Content.

Authors:  Naama Lang-Yona; Yinon Mazar; Michal Pardo; Yinon Rudich
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Absolute quantification of microbial taxon abundances.

Authors:  Ruben Props; Frederiek-Maarten Kerckhof; Peter Rubbens; Jo De Vrieze; Emma Hernandez Sanabria; Willem Waegeman; Pieter Monsieurs; Frederik Hammes; Nico Boon
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 10.302

7.  Identification of a Stable Hydrogen-Driven Microbiome in a Highly Radioactive Storage Facility on the Sellafield Site.

Authors:  Sharon Ruiz-Lopez; Lynn Foster; Chris Boothman; Nick Cole; Katherine Morris; Jonathan R Lloyd
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Development and Evaluation of qPCR Assay for Quantitation of Kazachstania slooffiae and Total Yeasts Occurring in the Porcine Gut.

Authors:  Vladimir Urubschurov; Kirsten Büsing; Pawel Janczyk; Wolfgang-Bernhard Souffrant; Annette Zeyner
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.188

9.  Anodes Stimulate Anaerobic Toluene Degradation via Sulfur Cycling in Marine Sediments.

Authors:  Matteo Daghio; Eleni Vaiopoulou; Sunil A Patil; Ana Suárez-Suárez; Ian M Head; Andrea Franzetti; Korneel Rabaey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Molecular fingerprinting of cyanobacteria from river biofilms as a water quality monitoring tool.

Authors:  Virginia Loza; Elvira Perona; Pilar Mateo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.