Literature DB >> 32750615

The magnitude and heterogeneity of antidepressant response in depression: A meta-analysis of over 45,000 patients.

Xin Guo1, Robert A McCutcheon2, Toby Pillinger2, Yuya Mizuno3, Sridhar Natesan4, Kirsten Brown2, Oliver Howes5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative variability and magnitude of symptomatic improvement in antidepressant-treated individuals compared to placebo-treated individuals, and to investigate moderating factors.
METHODS: Multiple databases and previous publications were searched through February 2019 to identify all randomized controlled trials comparing placebo and antidepressants in acute treatment of depression. Primary outcome was relative variability of change in symptom severity in antidepressant-treated individuals compared to placebo-treated patients quantified using the coefficient of variation ratio (CVR).
RESULTS: Of 9389 identified records, 134 were found to be eligible (total n = 46,646). Antidepressant-treated patients showed a significantly greater magnitude (g = 0.28, 95% CI 0.25-0.30, p < .0001) and lower variability (CVR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.93-0.95, p < .0001) of change in symptom severity relative to placebo-treated patients. Compared to placebo antidepressant-related improvement was more uniform in older studies (z = 3.01, p = .003) and in studies where antidepressants showed greater efficacy (z = -7.21, p < .0001). | Imipramine, moclobemide, amitriptyline and mirtazapine showed significantly lower CVR than several other antidepressants. However, no difference in CVR exists between multiple and single-neurotransmitter profile antidepressants (z = -0.01, p = .99).
CONCLUSION: There is lower variability and greater magnitude of change in symptom severity with antidepressant treatment relative to placebo. This is not consistent with our hypothesis that there are distinct sub-groups of treatment-responsive and treatment-resistant patients with major depression. Our results in-stead suggest that antidepressants show a relatively uniform effect.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32750615     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  4 in total

1.  The efficacy of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders in adults: an umbrella review and meta-analytic evaluation of recent meta-analyses.

Authors:  Falk Leichsenring; Christiane Steinert; Sven Rabung; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  Reappraising the variability of effects of antipsychotic medication in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert A McCutcheon; Toby Pillinger; Orestis Efthimiou; Marta Maslej; Benoit H Mulsant; Allan H Young; Andrea Cipriani; Oliver D Howes
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 79.683

Review 3.  Examining the variability of neurocognitive functioning in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ana Catalan; Joaquim Radua; Robert McCutcheon; Claudia Aymerich; Borja Pedruzo; Miguel Ángel González-Torres; Helen Baldwin; William S Stone; Anthony J Giuliano; Philip McGuire; Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 7.989

Review 4.  Treatment resistance in psychiatry: state of the art and new directions.

Authors:  Oliver D Howes; Michael E Thase; Toby Pillinger
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 15.992

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.