Literature DB >> 32750212

Fine-needle aspiration as an alternative to core needle biopsy for tumour molecular profiling in precision oncology: prospective comparative study of next-generation sequencing in cancer patients included in the SHIVA02 trial.

Célia Dupain1, Julien Masliah-Planchon2, Céline Gu3, Elodie Girard4, Pierre Gestraud4, Pauline Du Rusquec1, Edith Borcoman1, Diana Bello1, Francesco Ricci1, Ségolène Hescot1, Marie-Paule Sablin1, Patricia Tresca1, Alexandre de Moura1, Delphine Loirat1, Maxime Frelaut1, Anne Vincent-Salomon3, Charlotte Lecerf1, Céline Callens2, Samantha Antonio2, Coralie Franck2, Odette Mariani3, Ivan Bièche2,5, Maud Kamal1, Christophe Le Tourneau1,4,6, Vincent Servois7.   

Abstract

High-throughput molecular profiling of solid tumours using core needle biopsies (CNB) allows the identification of actionable molecular alterations, with around 70% success rate. Although several studies have demonstrated the utility of small biopsy specimens for molecular testing, there remains debate as to the sensitivity of the less invasive fine-needle aspiration (FNA) compared to CNB to detect molecular alterations. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the potential of FNA to detect such alterations in various tumour types as compared to CNB in cancer patients included in the SHIVA02 trial. An in-house amplicon-based targeted sequencing panel (Illumina TSCA 99.3 kb panel covering 87 genes) was used to identify pathogenic variants and gene copy number variations (CNV) in concomitant CNB and FNA samples obtained from 61 patients enrolled in the SHIVA02 trial (NCT03084757). The main tumour types analysed were breast (38%), colon (15%), pancreas (11%), followed by cervix and stomach (7% each). We report 123 molecular alterations (85 variants, 23 amplifications and 15 homozygous deletions) among which 98 (80%) were concordant between CNB and FNA. The remaining discordances were mainly related to deletions status, yet undetected alterations were not exclusively specific to FNA. Comparative analysis of molecular alterations in CNB and FNA showed high concordance in terms of variants as well as CNVs identified. We conclude FNA could therefore be used in routine diagnostics workflow and clinical trials for tumour molecular profiling with the advantages of being minimally invasive and preserve tissue material needed for diagnostic, prognostic or theranostic purposes.
© 2020 The Authors. Published by FEBS Press and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SHIVA02 trial; core biopsy; fine-needle aspiration; next-generation sequencing; precision medicine; tumour molecular profiling

Year:  2020        PMID: 32750212      PMCID: PMC7782085          DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Oncol        ISSN: 1574-7891            Impact factor:   6.603


  43 in total

Review 1.  Seize the opportunity: underutilization of fine-needle aspiration biopsy to inform targeted cancer therapy decisions.

Authors:  Douglas P Clark
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-10-25       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Real-Time Targeted Genome Profile Analysis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas Identifies Genetic Alterations That Might Be Targeted With Existing Drugs or Used as Biomarkers.

Authors:  Aatur D Singhi; Ben George; Joel R Greenbowe; Jon Chung; James Suh; Anirban Maitra; Samuel J Klempner; Andrew Hendifar; Javle M Milind; Talia Golan; Randall E Brand; Amer H Zureikat; Somak Roy; Alexa B Schrock; Vincent A Miller; Jeffrey S Ross; Siraj M Ali; Nathan Bahary
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2.

Authors:  Ben Langmead; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Genomic and transcriptomic profiling expands precision cancer medicine: the WINTHER trial.

Authors:  Jordi Rodon; Jean-Charles Soria; Raanan Berger; Wilson H Miller; Eitan Rubin; Aleksandra Kugel; Apostolia Tsimberidou; Pierre Saintigny; Aliza Ackerstein; Irene Braña; Yohann Loriot; Mohammad Afshar; Vincent Miller; Fanny Wunder; Catherine Bresson; Jean-François Martini; Jacques Raynaud; John Mendelsohn; Gerald Batist; Amir Onn; Josep Tabernero; Richard L Schilsky; Vladimir Lazar; J Jack Lee; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  Next-generation sequencing of cytologic preparations: An analysis of quality metrics.

Authors:  David H Hwang; Elizabeth P Garcia; Matthew D Ducar; Edmund S Cibas; Lynette M Sholl
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools.

Authors:  Heng Li; Bob Handsaker; Alec Wysoker; Tim Fennell; Jue Ruan; Nils Homer; Gabor Marth; Goncalo Abecasis; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Comparative study of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation analysis on cytology smears and surgical pathology specimens from primary and metastatic lung carcinomas.

Authors:  Renu Khode; Douglas A Larsen; Brianne C Culbreath; Shane Parrish; Kimberly L Walker; Lubna Sayage-Rabie; Robert S Beissner; Arundhati Rao
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Mutational Profile of Metastatic Breast Cancers: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Celine Lefebvre; Thomas Bachelot; Thomas Filleron; Marion Pedrero; Mario Campone; Jean-Charles Soria; Christophe Massard; Christelle Lévy; Monica Arnedos; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Julie Garrabey; Yannick Boursin; Marc Deloger; Yu Fu; Frédéric Commo; Véronique Scott; Ludovic Lacroix; Maria Vittoria Dieci; Maud Kamal; Véronique Diéras; Anthony Gonçalves; Jean-Marc Ferrerro; Gilles Romieu; Laurence Vanlemmens; Marie-Ange Mouret Reynier; Jean-Christophe Théry; Fanny Le Du; Séverine Guiu; Florence Dalenc; Gilles Clapisson; Hervé Bonnefoi; Marta Jimenez; Christophe Le Tourneau; Fabrice André
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Concordance of Circulating Tumor DNA and Matched Metastatic Tissue Biopsy in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander W Wyatt; Matti Annala; Rahul Aggarwal; Kevin Beja; Felix Feng; Jack Youngren; Adam Foye; Paul Lloyd; Matti Nykter; Tomasz M Beer; Joshi J Alumkal; George V Thomas; Robert E Reiter; Matthew B Rettig; Christopher P Evans; Allen C Gao; Kim N Chi; Eric J Small; Martin E Gleave
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes.

Authors:  Michael S Lawrence; Petar Stojanov; Paz Polak; Gregory V Kryukov; Kristian Cibulskis; Andrey Sivachenko; Scott L Carter; Chip Stewart; Craig H Mermel; Steven A Roberts; Adam Kiezun; Peter S Hammerman; Aaron McKenna; Yotam Drier; Lihua Zou; Alex H Ramos; Trevor J Pugh; Nicolas Stransky; Elena Helman; Jaegil Kim; Carrie Sougnez; Lauren Ambrogio; Elizabeth Nickerson; Erica Shefler; Maria L Cortés; Daniel Auclair; Gordon Saksena; Douglas Voet; Michael Noble; Daniel DiCara; Pei Lin; Lee Lichtenstein; David I Heiman; Timothy Fennell; Marcin Imielinski; Bryan Hernandez; Eran Hodis; Sylvan Baca; Austin M Dulak; Jens Lohr; Dan-Avi Landau; Catherine J Wu; Jorge Melendez-Zajgla; Alfredo Hidalgo-Miranda; Amnon Koren; Steven A McCarroll; Jaume Mora; Brian Crompton; Robert Onofrio; Melissa Parkin; Wendy Winckler; Kristin Ardlie; Stacey B Gabriel; Charles W M Roberts; Jaclyn A Biegel; Kimberly Stegmaier; Adam J Bass; Levi A Garraway; Matthew Meyerson; Todd R Golub; Dmitry A Gordenin; Shamil Sunyaev; Eric S Lander; Gad Getz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  4 in total

1.  The Porto European Cancer Research Summit 2021.

Authors:  Ulrik Ringborg; Anton Berns; Julio E Celis; Manuel Heitor; Josep Tabernero; Joachim Schüz; Michael Baumann; Rui Henrique; Matti Aapro; Partha Basu; Regina Beets-Tan; Benjamin Besse; Fátima Cardoso; Fátima Carneiro; Guy van den Eede; Alexander Eggermont; Stefan Fröhling; Susan Galbraith; Elena Garralda; Douglas Hanahan; Thomas Hofmarcher; Bengt Jönsson; Olli Kallioniemi; Miklós Kásler; Eva Kondorosi; Jan Korbel; Denis Lacombe; José Carlos Machado; José M Martin-Moreno; Francoise Meunier; Péter Nagy; Paolo Nuciforo; Simon Oberst; Júlio Oliveiera; Maria Papatriantafyllou; Walter Ricciardi; Alexander Roediger; Bettina Ryll; Richard Schilsky; Grazia Scocca; Raquel Seruca; Marta Soares; Karen Steindorf; Vincenzo Valentini; Emile Voest; Elisabete Weiderpass; Nils Wilking; Amanda Wren; Laurence Zitvogel
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Current classification systems and standardized terminology in cytopathology.

Authors:  Tibor Mezei
Journal:  Rom J Morphol Embryol       Date:  2020 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.033

Review 3.  Evaluating Pancreatic and Biliary Neoplasms with Small Biopsy-Based Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): Doing More with Less.

Authors:  Ilias P Nikas; Giannis Mountzios; Guy I Sydney; Kalliopi J Ioakim; Jae-Kyung Won; Panagiotis Papageorgis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Multiplex immune protein profiling of fine-needle aspirates from patients with non-small-cell lung cancer reveals signatures associated with PD-L1 expression and tumor stage.

Authors:  Bo Franzén; Kristina Viktorsson; Caroline Kamali; Eva Darai-Ramqvist; Vitali Grozman; Vasiliki Arapi; Petra Hååg; Vitaliy O Kaminskyy; Per Hydbring; Lena Kanter; Sven Nyrén; Simon Ekman; Luigi De Petris; Rolf Lewensohn
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 6.603

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.