Literature DB >> 32749592

Mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 replicates efficiently in the upper and lower respiratory tract of BALB/c and C57BL/6J mice.

Jinliang Wang1, Lei Shuai1, Chong Wang1, Renqiang Liu1, Xijun He2, Xianfeng Zhang2, Ziruo Sun1, Dan Shan1, Jinying Ge1, Xijun Wang1, Ronghong Hua1, Gongxun Zhong3, Zhiyuan Wen4, Zhigao Bu5,6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32749592      PMCID: PMC7401472          DOI: 10.1007/s13238-020-00767-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Cell        ISSN: 1674-800X            Impact factor:   14.870


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, As of June, 2020, more than ten million cases of COVID-19 have been reported worldwide. The causative pathogen of the disease is a novel coronavirus named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (World Health Organization, 2020). Animal infection models are important to characterize the infection, pathogenesis, and immunology of SARS-CoV-2, as well as for the development of medications and vaccines against COVID-19. Mice are particularly attractive animal models for their identical genetic background, reliable reproducibility, well characterized biology, and the huge availability of research reagents and knockout animals. Models in inbreed mice such as BALB/c and C57BL/6J (C57), which are widely used in research, are highly desired. The ideal model should mimic the infection of SARS-CoV-2 in humans, in whom the virus efficiently replicates in both the upper and lower respiratory tracts. Several SARS-CoV-2 mouse infection models, including human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) transgenic mouse models (Bao et al., 2020; Jiang et al., 2020), a BALB/c mouse-adapted virus model (Gu et al., 2020), a reverse genetically modified SARS-CoV-2 infection model (Dinnon III et al., 2020), and recombinant adenovirus-mediated transient expression of human ACE2 mouse models (Hassan et al., 2020; Sun et al., 2020), have been reported that viruses efficiently replicated in the lung. However, none of these reported models showed significant and stable infection in the upper respiratory tract. SARS-CoV-2 infection of the upper respiratory tract in humans is highly associated with the initial infection, the shedding of the offspring virus, and the transmission capability of the disease. Prevention of virus replication in the upper and lower respiratory tract is, therefore, highly desirable and an important aspect of the development of antiviral medications and vaccines against COVID-19. The mouse-adapted virus infected mouse model established here resembling the infection of SARS-CoV-2 in humans will be helpful to achieve the goals. Firstly, we found SARS-CoV-2/HRB26/human/2020/CHN (HRB26) is able to establish infection in the respiratory tract of BALB/c mice (Fig. S1). 4–6-week-old female BALB/c mice were intranasally (i.n.) infected with HRB26 at a dose of 106.2 plaque forming unit (PFU). On day 3 post inoculation (p.i.), the nasal turbinates and lungs were respectively collected and homogenized for viral RNA detection by qPCR and virus titration in Vero E6 cells. HRB26 only infected the nasal turbinates of 2 of the 3 inoculated mice and the lung of 1 of the 3 inoculated mice (Fig. S1). We serially passaged HRB26 in 4–6-week-old female BALB/c mice. A mixture of nasal turbinate and lung homogenate from the mouse of each passage with the highest viral RNA copies was used to inoculate three mice via intranasal inoculation. The viral RNA loads increased by passages in the nasal turbinates (Fig. S1A) and lungs (Fig. S1B). The infectious titres in the nasal turbinates and lungs at passage 14 (P14) were 105 PFU/g and 106.7 PFU/g on day 3 p.i., respectively (Fig. S1C and S1D). The virus of P14 was propagated in Vero E6 cells and the resultant mouse-adapted virus was designated as HRB26M (105.7 PFU/mL). The 50% mouse infectious dose (MID50) of HRB26M in 4–6-week-old female BALB/c mice was 1.4 PFU (Fig. S2). In the mice infected i.n. with HRB26M, the viral RNA was detected in the nasal turbinates on day 3, 5, and 7 p.i., and the infectious virus was detected on day 3 and 5 p.i. (Fig. 1A and 1B). The viral RNA was also detected in the heart, liver, kidney and spleen on day 3 p.i., but not on day 5 and day 7 p.i., respectively (Fig. S3A and S3B).
Figure 1

Characterization of Mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 HRB26M in mice. Groups of nine 4–6-week-old female BALB/c mice (A, B), 4–6-week-old female C57 mice (C, D) or 8–9-week-old male BALB/c mice (E, F) were inoculated i.n. with 104.4 PFU of HRB26M in a volume of 50 μL. On days 3, 5, and 7 p.i., three mice were each euthanized, and their nasal turbinates and lungs were collected for virus detection. The viral RNA copies (A, C, E) and infectious titres (B, D, F) in each organ were detected by qPCR and virus titration. The horizontal dashed lines indicate the limit of detection. Histopathologic and immunohistochemical studies were performed on samples from the HRB26M-inoculated young female mice (G–L) and aging adult male mice (M–R). The nasal respiratory mucosa epithelium exhibited an abnormal arrangement with loss of cilia accompanied by monocyte and lymphocyte infiltration in the lamina propria on day 3 p.i. (G). Diffuse degeneration of the epithelial cells of the bronchiole and moderate peripheral inflammatory cell infiltration were observed on day 5 p.i. (H). Congestion in the interalveolar septa and perivascular edema were commonly observed in the lungs on day 3 p.i. (I). Viral antigen was detected in the epithelium of the nasal respiratory mucosa (J), the epithelial cells of the bronchiole (K), and the alveolar septa cells (L) on day 3 p.i.. Degeneration and necrosis of the epithelial cells of the bronchiole and alveolar duct, and monocyte and lymphocyte infiltration in the lumen of the lungs were observed on day 3 p.i. (M). Perivascular edema and inflammation (N) and monocyte and lymphocyte congestion in the interalveolar septa and alveolar lumen (O) of the lung were observed on day 5 p.i. Viral antigens were detected in the epithelium of the nasal mucosa (P), bronchiole (Q) and alveolar septa (R) on day 3 p.i. Bars, 100 μm. (S) Location of the mutations and deletion in the genome of HRB26M and the alignment of the sequence near the polybasic cleavage site of the S protein of different SARS-CoV-2 strains. IVDC-HB-1, BetaCoV/Wuhan/IVDC-HB-01/2019|EPI_ISL_402119; RmYN02, BetaCoV/Rm/Yunnan/YN02/2019|EPI_ISL_412977; RaTG13, BetaCoV/bat/Yunnan/RaTG13/2013|EPI_ISL_402131

Characterization of Mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 HRB26M in mice. Groups of nine 4–6-week-old female BALB/c mice (A, B), 4–6-week-old female C57 mice (C, D) or 8–9-week-old male BALB/c mice (E, F) were inoculated i.n. with 104.4 PFU of HRB26M in a volume of 50 μL. On days 3, 5, and 7 p.i., three mice were each euthanized, and their nasal turbinates and lungs were collected for virus detection. The viral RNA copies (A, C, E) and infectious titres (B, D, F) in each organ were detected by qPCR and virus titration. The horizontal dashed lines indicate the limit of detection. Histopathologic and immunohistochemical studies were performed on samples from the HRB26M-inoculated young female mice (G–L) and aging adult male mice (M–R). The nasal respiratory mucosa epithelium exhibited an abnormal arrangement with loss of cilia accompanied by monocyte and lymphocyte infiltration in the lamina propria on day 3 p.i. (G). Diffuse degeneration of the epithelial cells of the bronchiole and moderate peripheral inflammatory cell infiltration were observed on day 5 p.i. (H). Congestion in the interalveolar septa and perivascular edema were commonly observed in the lungs on day 3 p.i. (I). Viral antigen was detected in the epithelium of the nasal respiratory mucosa (J), the epithelial cells of the bronchiole (K), and the alveolar septa cells (L) on day 3 p.i.. Degeneration and necrosis of the epithelial cells of the bronchiole and alveolar duct, and monocyte and lymphocyte infiltration in the lumen of the lungs were observed on day 3 p.i. (M). Perivascular edema and inflammation (N) and monocyte and lymphocyte congestion in the interalveolar septa and alveolar lumen (O) of the lung were observed on day 5 p.i. Viral antigens were detected in the epithelium of the nasal mucosa (P), bronchiole (Q) and alveolar septa (R) on day 3 p.i. Bars, 100 μm. (S) Location of the mutations and deletion in the genome of HRB26M and the alignment of the sequence near the polybasic cleavage site of the S protein of different SARS-CoV-2 strains. IVDC-HB-1, BetaCoV/Wuhan/IVDC-HB-01/2019|EPI_ISL_402119; RmYN02, BetaCoV/Rm/Yunnan/YN02/2019|EPI_ISL_412977; RaTG13, BetaCoV/bat/Yunnan/RaTG13/2013|EPI_ISL_402131 Mild pathological changes were observed in the respiratory tract of 4–6-week-old BALB/c mice infected i.n. with HRB26M (Fig. 1G–I). Viral antigens were detected in the epithelium of the nasal respiratory mucosa (Fig. 1J), the epithelial cells of the bronchiole (Fig. 1K) and the alveolar septa cells (Fig. 1L) on day 3 p.i. These results demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 successfully adapted and efficiently infected the upper and lower respiratory tract of young BALB/c mice. SARS-CoV-2 infection causes more serious disease and higher mortality in people older than 65 years (Guan et al., 2020). We then assessed the infectivity and pathogenicity of HRB26M in 8–9-month-old (aging adult) male BALB/c mice. Aging adult mice inoculated i.n. with 104.4 PFU of HRB26M showed transient weight loss on days 2 and 3 p.i. and recovered thereafter, similar to young mice (Fig. S4A and S4B). The viral RNA loads in the nasal turbinates were 108.7~9.5 copies/g, 108.5~9.2, and 108.4~8.7 copies/g on days 3, 5, and 7 p.i., respectively (Fig. 1E). The lungs had peak viral RNA loads of 109.5~9.7 on day 3 p.i., and then slightly decreased loads on days 5 and 7 p.i. (Fig. 1E). Viral RNAs were also detected in the heart, brain, kidney, spleen, small intestine, and liver in some or all three inoculated mice on days 3 and 5 p.i. (Fig. S3E). Infectious virus titres in the nasal turbinates and lungs peaked on day 3 p.i. The average PFU titres were 3 times higher than those in the nasal turbinates of young female mice, but about 10 times higher in the lungs of the older mice than those of the younger mice (Fig. 1B and 1F). These results indicate that the mouse-adapted virus HRB26M infects aging adult BALB/c mice more extensively than young BALB/c mice. Histopathologic study revealed that aging adult mice developed moderate-to-severe pathological changes in the lungs after infection (Fig. 1M–O). Compared to younger mice, much stronger viral antigen signals were detected in the epithelium of the nasal mucosa (Fig. 1P), the bronchiole (Fig. 1Q) and the alveolar septa (Fig. 1R) on day 3 p.i., which is coincident with the results of virus loads. The results demonstrate that HRB26M causes more severe pathological changes in the respiratory tract in aging adult mice. C57 is the most widely used line for generating gene knockout mouse. We next tested the infectivity of HRB26M in C57 mice. Group of six 4–6-week-old C57 mice were inoculated i.n. with 104.4 PFU of HRB26M. The average viral loads in the nasal turbinates were 108.2 copies/g, 107.6 and 106.5 copies/g of viral RNA and 103.3 PFU/g, 102.9 PFU/g and negative detection of infectious virus titres on days 3, 5 and 7 p.i., respectively (Fig. 1C and 1D). The average viral loads in the lungs were 107.9 copies/g, 107.0 and 106.9 copies/g of viral RNA and 104.4 PFU/g, 102.3 PFU/g and negative detection of infectious virus titres on days 3, 5 and 7 p.i., respectively. These findings indicate that HRB26M efficiently infects both the upper and lower respiratory tract of C57 mice. We next compared the whole genome of mouse passage 5 (P5) and P14 viruses with that of HRB26. Two nonsynonymous mutations, Q498H and N969S, and a deletion of five amino acids (675QTQTN679) that flanks the cleavage site in the S gene were found in P5 virus (Fig. 1S). In P14 virus, an additional mutation of A81T in the nsp8 gene encoding the cofactor of RdRp (Kirchdoerfer and Ward, 2019) happened (Fig. 1S). The position 498 in the receptor binding domain is important for the selective binding of the S protein to the ACE2 receptor (Dinnon III et al., 2020). The Q498H mutation in P5 virus may be a key for the early adaptation. Interestingly, the deletion of residues 675–679 in S has previously been reported in SARS-CoV-2 virus after passage in cell culture and in original human clinical samples (Liu et al., 2020). Notably, a similar deletion of QTQT at positions 675–678 of S has been reported in bat-derived SARS-like strains (Zhou et al., 2020). It will be important to clarify whether this deletion plays a role in the interspecies host transmission and adaption of SARS-CoV-2. The nsp8-A81T mutation, which was found in P14 virus but not in P5 or P10 viruses, may have a role in the enhanced replication of HRB26M. How these mutations and deletion affect mouse adaption remains to be investigated. Remdesivir is a nucleoside analogue with antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 (Wang et al., 2020a). We confirmed that HRB26 and HRB26M have similar sensitivity to remdesivir in Vero E6 cells (Fig. 2A and 2B). Clinical trials have shown that remdesivir is a promising antiviral drug for the treatment of COVID-19 (Beigel et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020b). However, the efficacy of remdesivir to prevent the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in the upper respiratory tract remains to be investigated. Here, we assessed the antiviral efficacy of remdesivir in HRB26M-infected BALB/c mouse model.
Figure 2

Evaluation of remdesivir against SARS-CoV-2 infection and . Vero E6 cells were pretreated with the indicated concentrations of remdesivir or DMSO (0 μmol/L) for one hour. The cells were then infected with HRB26 or HRB26M at an MOI of 0.005 and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. After the cells were washed with PBS, virus growth medium containing the indicated concentrations of remdesivir or DMSO was added. Relative viral titers at 24 h post-inoculation (A) were calculated from the ratios for the mock-treated counterparts. Data shown are the mean values with standard deviations for the results of three independent experiments. The horizontal dashed lines indicate the 50% inhibition of remdesivir against SARS-CoV-2. (B) Cell viability was determined 24 h post-inoculation by using the Cell Titer-Glo kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. Groups of six 4–6-week-old female BALB/c mice were treated i.m. (C and D) with a loading dose of 50 or 10 mg/kg remdesivir, followed by a daily maintenance dose of 25 or 5 mg/kg. Alternatively, groups of six mice were treated with a loading dose of 50 mg/kg remdesivir, followed by a daily maintenance dose of 25 mg/kg i.n. alone or a combination of i.n. and i.m. (E and F). Control mice were administrated vehicle solution (12% sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin, pH 3.5) daily, in parallel (0 mg/kg). One hour after administration of the loading dose of remdesivir or vehicle solution, the mice were inoculated i.n. with 103.6 PFU of HRB26M in a volume of 50 μL. On days 3 and 5 p.i., three mice in each group were euthanized and their nasal turbinates and lungs were collected. The viral RNA copies and infectious titres in the nasal turbinates (C, E) and lungs (D, F) were detected by qPCR and virus titration. The concentrations of the daily maintenance doses are shown. The horizontal dashed lines indicate the limit of detection

Evaluation of remdesivir against SARS-CoV-2 infection and . Vero E6 cells were pretreated with the indicated concentrations of remdesivir or DMSO (0 μmol/L) for one hour. The cells were then infected with HRB26 or HRB26M at an MOI of 0.005 and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. After the cells were washed with PBS, virus growth medium containing the indicated concentrations of remdesivir or DMSO was added. Relative viral titers at 24 h post-inoculation (A) were calculated from the ratios for the mock-treated counterparts. Data shown are the mean values with standard deviations for the results of three independent experiments. The horizontal dashed lines indicate the 50% inhibition of remdesivir against SARS-CoV-2. (B) Cell viability was determined 24 h post-inoculation by using the Cell Titer-Glo kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. Groups of six 4–6-week-old female BALB/c mice were treated i.m. (C and D) with a loading dose of 50 or 10 mg/kg remdesivir, followed by a daily maintenance dose of 25 or 5 mg/kg. Alternatively, groups of six mice were treated with a loading dose of 50 mg/kg remdesivir, followed by a daily maintenance dose of 25 mg/kg i.n. alone or a combination of i.n. and i.m. (E and F). Control mice were administrated vehicle solution (12% sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin, pH 3.5) daily, in parallel (0 mg/kg). One hour after administration of the loading dose of remdesivir or vehicle solution, the mice were inoculated i.n. with 103.6 PFU of HRB26M in a volume of 50 μL. On days 3 and 5 p.i., three mice in each group were euthanized and their nasal turbinates and lungs were collected. The viral RNA copies and infectious titres in the nasal turbinates (C, E) and lungs (D, F) were detected by qPCR and virus titration. The concentrations of the daily maintenance doses are shown. The horizontal dashed lines indicate the limit of detection Groups of six 4–6-week-old female BALB/c mice were intramuscularly (i.m.) administered remdesivir at a dose of 25 mg/kg or 5 mg/kg. For the mock-treatment control, mice were administrated vehicle solution (12% sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin, pH 3.5) daily. One hour after remdesivir administration, mice were inoculated i.n. with 103.6 PFU of HRB26M. In the high-dose remdesivir-treated group, the viral RNA was detected in the lungs of 2 of the 3 mice on day 3 p.i. and 1 of the 3 mice on day 5 p.i.; however, the viral RNA loads and the virus titers were at least 1,000-times lower than those in the mock-treated mice (Fig. 2C and 2D). In the low-dose remdesivir-treated group, the virus yields were only slightly reduced when compared to those in mock-treated mice. However, virus replication in the nasal turbinates was not significantly affected after remdesivir treatment in both the high and low dose groups (Fig. 2C and 2D). These data indicate that remdesivir treatment via intramuscular route efficiently inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in the lungs in a dose-dependent manner, but not in the nasal turbinates of BALB/c mice. We then tested whether intranasal administration could improve the efficacy of remdesivir to inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in the upper respiratory tract. Mice were treated i.n. with remdesivir at a dose of 25 mg/kg and the virus replication in the nasal turbinates was completely blocked. No infectious virus was detected on days 3 and 5 p.i., although viral RNA was detected in 1 of the 3 mice on day 3 p.i. (Fig. 2E). Compared to the vehicle-treated group, intranasal administration of remdesivir also significantly inhibited virus replication in the lungs (P < 0.01) (Fig. 2F). Moreover, remdesivir treatment via the combined intranasal and intramuscular routes completely prevented virus replication in the nasal turbinates and significantly inhibited virus replication in the lungs (P < 0.01). Infectious virus was recovered from the lungs of 1 of the 3 mice on day 3 p.i., but not from any of mice on day 5 p.i., although viral RNAs were detected from the lungs of 2 of the 3 mice on day 3 p.i. and 1 of the 3 mice on day 5 p.i. (Fig. 2F). The data suggested that intranasal administration of remdesivir successfully prevents the replication of virus in the upper respiratory tract. Combined intranasal and intramuscular treatment efficiently inhibits replication of virus in the upper and lower respiratory tract of mice. Our results indicated the difference in the pharmacokinetics of remdesivir between the upper and lower respiratory tract. Combined intramuscular and intranasal administration of remdesivir should be developed and considered for future clinic practice. In conclusion, we generated a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 resembling the infection of SARS-CoV-2 in humans. The mouse-adapted virus replicates efficiently in the upper and lower respiratory tract in BALB/c and C57BL/6J mice. The mouse-adapted virus infection model will be a powerful tool for research and development against COVID-19. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary material 1 (PDF 844 kb)
  8 in total

1.  A vaccine targeting the RBD of the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 induces protective immunity.

Authors:  Jingyun Yang; Wei Wang; Zimin Chen; Shuaiyao Lu; Fanli Yang; Zhenfei Bi; Linlin Bao; Fei Mo; Xue Li; Yong Huang; Weiqi Hong; Yun Yang; Yuan Zhao; Fei Ye; Sheng Lin; Wei Deng; Hua Chen; Hong Lei; Ziqi Zhang; Min Luo; Hong Gao; Yue Zheng; Yanqiu Gong; Xiaohua Jiang; Yanfeng Xu; Qi Lv; Dan Li; Manni Wang; Fengdi Li; Shunyi Wang; Guanpeng Wang; Pin Yu; Yajin Qu; Li Yang; Hongxin Deng; Aiping Tong; Jiong Li; Zhenling Wang; Jinliang Yang; Guobo Shen; Zhiwei Zhao; Yuhua Li; Jingwen Luo; Hongqi Liu; Wenhai Yu; Mengli Yang; Jingwen Xu; Junbin Wang; Haiyan Li; Haixuan Wang; Dexuan Kuang; Panpan Lin; Zhengtao Hu; Wei Guo; Wei Cheng; Yanlin He; Xiangrong Song; Chong Chen; Zhihong Xue; Shaohua Yao; Lu Chen; Xuelei Ma; Siyuan Chen; Maling Gou; Weijin Huang; Youchun Wang; Changfa Fan; Zhixin Tian; Ming Shi; Fu-Sheng Wang; Lunzhi Dai; Min Wu; Gen Li; Guangyu Wang; Yong Peng; Zhiyong Qian; Canhua Huang; Johnson Yiu-Nam Lau; Zhenglin Yang; Yuquan Wei; Xiaobo Cen; Xiaozhong Peng; Chuan Qin; Kang Zhang; Guangwen Lu; Xiawei Wei
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Real-time conformational dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 spikes on virus particles.

Authors:  Maolin Lu; Pradeep D Uchil; Wenwei Li; Desheng Zheng; Daniel S Terry; Jason Gorman; Wei Shi; Baoshan Zhang; Tongqing Zhou; Shilei Ding; Romain Gasser; Jeremie Prevost; Guillaume Beaudoin-Bussieres; Sai Priya Anand; Annemarie Laumaea; Jonathan R Grover; Liu Lihong; David D Ho; John Mascola; Andres Finzi; Peter D Kwong; Scott C Blanchard; Walther Mothes
Journal:  bioRxiv       Date:  2020-09-13

3.  High Potency of a Bivalent Human VH Domain in SARS-CoV-2 Animal Models.

Authors:  Wei Li; Alexandra Schäfer; Swarali S Kulkarni; Xianglei Liu; David R Martinez; Chuan Chen; Zehua Sun; Sarah R Leist; Aleksandra Drelich; Liyong Zhang; Marcin L Ura; Alison Berezuk; Sagar Chittori; Karoline Leopold; Dhiraj Mannar; Shanti S Srivastava; Xing Zhu; Eric C Peterson; Chien-Te Tseng; John W Mellors; Darryl Falzarano; Sriram Subramaniam; Ralph S Baric; Dimiter S Dimitrov
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  An mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 - Preliminary Report.

Authors:  Lisa A Jackson; Evan J Anderson; Nadine G Rouphael; Paul C Roberts; Mamodikoe Makhene; Rhea N Coler; Michele P McCullough; James D Chappell; Mark R Denison; Laura J Stevens; Andrea J Pruijssers; Adrian McDermott; Britta Flach; Nicole A Doria-Rose; Kizzmekia S Corbett; Kaitlyn M Morabito; Sijy O'Dell; Stephen D Schmidt; Phillip A Swanson; Marcelino Padilla; John R Mascola; Kathleen M Neuzil; Hamilton Bennett; Wellington Sun; Etza Peters; Mat Makowski; Jim Albert; Kaitlyn Cross; Wendy Buchanan; Rhonda Pikaart-Tautges; Julie E Ledgerwood; Barney S Graham; John H Beigel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Multimodal Analysis of Composition and Spatial Architecture in Human Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Andrew L Ji; Adam J Rubin; Kim Thrane; Sizun Jiang; David L Reynolds; Robin M Meyers; Margaret G Guo; Benson M George; Annelie Mollbrink; Joseph Bergenstråhle; Ludvig Larsson; Yunhao Bai; Bokai Zhu; Aparna Bhaduri; Jordan M Meyers; Xavier Rovira-Clavé; S Tyler Hollmig; Sumaira Z Aasi; Garry P Nolan; Joakim Lundeberg; Paul A Khavari
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Elicitation of potent neutralizing antibody responses by designed protein nanoparticle vaccines for SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Alexandra C Walls; Brooke Fiala; Alexandra Schäfer; Samuel Wrenn; Minh N Pham; Michael Murphy; Longping V Tse; Laila Shehata; Megan A O'Connor; Chengbo Chen; Mary Jane Navarro; Marcos C Miranda; Deleah Pettie; Rashmi Ravichandran; John C Kraft; Cassandra Ogohara; Anne Palser; Sara Chalk; E-Chiang Lee; Elizabeth Kepl; Cameron M Chow; Claire Sydeman; Edgar A Hodge; Brieann Brown; Jim T Fuller; Kenneth H Dinnon; Lisa E Gralinski; Sarah R Leist; Kendra L Gully; Thomas B Lewis; Miklos Guttman; Helen Y Chu; Kelly K Lee; Deborah H Fuller; Ralph S Baric; Paul Kellam; Lauren Carter; Marion Pepper; Timothy P Sheahan; David Veesler; Neil P King
Journal:  bioRxiv       Date:  2020-08-12

7.  A Single-Dose Intranasal ChAd Vaccine Protects Upper and Lower Respiratory Tracts against SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Ahmed O Hassan; Natasha M Kafai; Igor P Dmitriev; Julie M Fox; Brittany K Smith; Ian B Harvey; Rita E Chen; Emma S Winkler; Alex W Wessel; James Brett Case; Elena Kashentseva; Broc T McCune; Adam L Bailey; Haiyan Zhao; Laura A VanBlargan; Ya-Nan Dai; Meisheng Ma; Lucas J Adams; Swathi Shrihari; Jonathan E Danis; Lisa E Gralinski; Yixuan J Hou; Alexandra Schäfer; Arthur S Kim; Shamus P Keeler; Daniela Weiskopf; Ralph S Baric; Michael J Holtzman; Daved H Fremont; David T Curiel; Michael S Diamond
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 66.850

8.  Neuroinvasion of SARS-CoV-2 in human and mouse brain.

Authors:  Eric Song; Ce Zhang; Benjamin Israelow; Alice Lu-Culligan; Alba Vieites Prado; Sophie Skriabine; Peiwen Lu; Orr-El Weizman; Feimei Liu; Yile Dai; Klara Szigeti-Buck; Yuki Yasumoto; Guilin Wang; Christopher Castaldi; Jaime Heltke; Evelyn Ng; John Wheeler; Mia Madel Alfajaro; Etienne Levavasseur; Benjamin Fontes; Neal G Ravindra; David Van Dijk; Shrikant Mane; Murat Gunel; Aaron Ring; Syed A Jaffar Kazmi; Kai Zhang; Craig B Wilen; Tamas L Horvath; Isabelle Plu; Stephane Haik; Jean-Leon Thomas; Angeliki Louvi; Shelli F Farhadian; Anita Huttner; Danielle Seilhean; Nicolas Renier; Kaya Bilguvar; Akiko Iwasaki
Journal:  bioRxiv       Date:  2020-09-08
  8 in total
  35 in total

1.  Animal models in SARS-CoV-2 research.

Authors:  Hin Chu; Jasper Fuk-Woo Chan; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Genetic Diversity and Evolutionary Convergence of Cryptic SARS-CoV-2 Lineages Detected Via Wastewater Sequencing.

Authors:  Devon A Gregory; Monica Trujillo; Clayton Rushford; Anna Flury; Sherin Kannoly; Kaung Myat San; Dustin Lyfoung; Roger W Wiseman; Karen Bromert; Ming-Yi Zhou; Ellen Kesler; Nathan Bivens; Jay Hoskins; Chung-Ho Lin; David H O'Connor; Chris Wieberg; Jeff Wenzel; Rose S Kantor; John J Dennehy; Marc C Johnson
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2022-06-03

3.  Broader-species receptor binding and structural bases of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 to both mouse and palm-civet ACE2s.

Authors:  Linjie Li; Pu Han; Baihan Huang; Yufeng Xie; Weiwei Li; Di Zhang; Pengcheng Han; Zepeng Xu; Bin Bai; Jingya Zhou; Xinrui Kang; Xiaomei Li; Anqi Zheng; Rong Zhang; Shitong Qiao; Xin Zhao; Jianxun Qi; Qihui Wang; Kefang Liu; George Fu Gao
Journal:  Cell Discov       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 38.079

4.  Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 Spike mutations important for infection of mice and escape from human immune sera.

Authors:  Raveen Rathnasinghe; Sonia Jangra; Chengjin Ye; Anastasija Cupic; Gagandeep Singh; Carles Martínez-Romero; Lubbertus C F Mulder; Thomas Kehrer; Soner Yildiz; Angela Choi; Stephen T Yeung; Ignacio Mena; Virginia Gillespie; Jana De Vrieze; Sadaf Aslam; Daniel Stadlbauer; David A Meekins; Chester D McDowell; Velmurugan Balaraman; Michael J Corley; Juergen A Richt; Bruno G De Geest; Lisa Miorin; Florian Krammer; Luis Martinez-Sobrido; Viviana Simon; Adolfo García-Sastre; Michael Schotsaert
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 5.  Animal models for COVID-19: advances, gaps and perspectives.

Authors:  Changfa Fan; Yong Wu; Xiong Rui; Yuansong Yang; Chen Ling; Susu Liu; Shunan Liu; Youchun Wang
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-07-07

6.  Intranasal Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 Immunization with Lipid Adjuvants Provides Systemic and Mucosal Immune Response against SARS-CoV-2 S1 Spike and Nucleocapsid Protein.

Authors:  Anirban Sengupta; Mohammad Azharuddin; Maria E Cardona; Claudia Devito; Eleanore von Castelmur; Anna Wehlin; Zuzanna Pietras; Maria Sunnerhagen; Robert Selegård; Daniel Aili; Ali Alamer; Jorma Hinkula; Noha Al-Otaibi
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-24

7.  Q493K and Q498H substitutions in Spike promote adaptation of SARS-CoV-2 in mice.

Authors:  Kun Huang; Yufei Zhang; Xianfeng Hui; Ya Zhao; Wenxiao Gong; Ting Wang; Shaoran Zhang; Yong Yang; Fei Deng; Qiang Zhang; Xi Chen; Ying Yang; Xiaomei Sun; Huanchun Chen; Yizhi J Tao; Zhong Zou; Meilin Jin
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 8.143

Review 8.  Understanding the Host Innate Immune Responses against SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Yeon-Woo Kang; Subin Park; Kun-Joo Lee; Dain Moon; Young-Min Kim; Seung-Woo Lee
Journal:  Immune Netw       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 6.303

Review 9.  Animal models for SARS-CoV-2 research: A comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  Kabita Pandey; Arpan Acharya; Mahesh Mohan; Caroline L Ng; St Patrick Reid; Siddappa N Byrareddy
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 5.005

10.  SARS-CoV-2 rapidly adapts in aged BALB/c mice and induces typical pneumonia.

Authors:  Yufei Zhang; Kun Huang; Ting Wang; Fei Deng; Wenxiao Gong; Xianfeng Hui; Ya Zhao; Xinlin He; Chengfei Li; Qiang Zhang; Xi Chen; Changjie Lv; Xian Lin; Ying Yang; Xiaomei Sun; Zhengli Shi; Huanchun Chen; Zhong Zou; Meilin Jin
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.