Literature DB >> 15964278

Perception of the consequences of self-action is temporally tuned and event driven.

Paul M Bays1, Daniel M Wolpert, J Randall Flanagan.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that in order to increase the salience of sensations with an external cause, sensations that are predictable based on one's own actions are attenuated [1 and 2]. This may explain why self-imposed tickle [3 and 4] or constant forces [5] are perceived as less intense than the same stimuli externally imposed. Here, subjects used their right index finger to tap a force sensor mounted above their left index finger. When a motor generated a tap on the left finger synchronously with the right tap, simulating contact between the fingers, the perception of force in the left finger was attenuated compared to the same tap experienced during rest. Attenuation gradually reduced as the left tap was either delayed or advanced relative to the active right tap. However, no attenuation was seen to left taps triggered by right-finger movements that stopped above or passed wide of the sensor. We conclude that there is a window of sensory attenuation that is broadly temporally tuned and centered on the time at which the fingers would normally make contact. That is, predictive tactile sensory attenuation is linked to specific external events arising from movement rather than to the movement per se.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15964278     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  70 in total

1.  Temporal and spatial constraints of action effect on sensory binding.

Authors:  Xavier Corveleyn; Joan Lopez-Moliner; Yann Coello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Neurophysiology of prehension. II. Response diversity in primary somatosensory (S-I) and motor (M-I) cortices.

Authors:  Esther P Gardner; Jin Y Ro; K Srinivasa Babu; Soumya Ghosh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Action preparation enhances the processing of tactile targets.

Authors:  Georgiana Juravle; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Bayesian and "anti-Bayesian" biases in sensory integration for action and perception in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A critical speed for gating of tactile detection during voluntary movement.

Authors:  Anita Cybulska-Klosowicz; El-Mehdi Meftah; Mélissa Raby; Marie-Line Lemieux; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Spatially selective enhancement of proprioceptive acuity following motor learning.

Authors:  Jeremy D Wong; Elizabeth T Wilson; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Agency elicits body-ownership: proprioceptive drift toward a synchronously acting external proxy.

Authors:  Tomohisa Asai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Effect before cause: supramodal recalibration of sensorimotor timing.

Authors:  James Heron; James V M Hanson; David Whitaker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Corticomuscular coherence between motor cortex, somatosensory areas and forearm muscles in the monkey.

Authors:  Claire L Witham; Minyan Wang; Stuart N Baker
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.