Adrian R Whyte1, Sajida Rahman2, Lynne Bell1, Indika Edirisinghe2, Robert Krikorian3, Claire M Williams4, Britt Burton-Freeman2. 1. School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AL, UK. 2. Centre for Nutrition Research, Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Centre, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 4. School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AL, UK. claire.williams@reading.ac.uk.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Research has demonstrated cognitive benefits following acute polyphenol-rich berry consumption in children and young adults. Berry intake also has been associated with metabolic benefits. No study has yet examined cognitive performance in middle-aged adults. We investigated the relationships among cognitive and metabolic outcomes in middle-aged adults following wild blueberry (WBB) consumption. METHODS:Thirty-five individuals aged 40-65 years participated in a randomized, double blind, cross-over study. Participants consumed a breakfast meal and 1-cup equivalent WBB drink or matched placebo beverage on two occasions. Participants completed cognitive tasks and had blood drawn before and at regular intervals for 8 h after each meal/treatment. Changes in episodic memory and executive function (EF) were assessed alongside plasma levels of glucose, insulin, and triglyceride. RESULTS: Analysis of the memory-related Auditory Verbal Learning Task (AVLT) word recognition measure revealed a decrease in performance over the test day after placebo intake, whereas performance after WBB was maintained. For the AVLT word rejection measure, participants identified more foils following WBB in comparison to placebo. Benefits were also observed for EF on the Go/No-Go task with fewer errors following WBB intake on cognitively demanding invalid No-Go trials in comparison to placebo. Furthermore, in comparison to placebo, response times were faster for the Go/No-Go task, specifically at 4 h and 8 h following WBB treatment. We also observed reduced post-meal glucose and insulin, but not triglyceride, concentrations in comparison to placebo over the first 2 h following ingestion. Though the addition of Age, BMI, glucose and insulin as covariates to the analysis reduced the significant effect of beverage for AVLT word rejection, metabolic outcomes did not interact with treatment to predict cognitive performance with the exception of one isolated trend. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated acute cognitive benefits of WBB intake in cognitively healthy middle-aged individuals, particularly in the context of demanding tasks and cognitive fatigue. WBB improved glucose and insulin responses to a meal. Further research is required to elucidate the underlying mechanism by which WBB improves cognitive function.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Research has demonstrated cognitive benefits following acute polyphenol-rich berry consumption in children and young adults. Berry intake also has been associated with metabolic benefits. No study has yet examined cognitive performance in middle-aged adults. We investigated the relationships among cognitive and metabolic outcomes in middle-aged adults following wild blueberry (WBB) consumption. METHODS: Thirty-five individuals aged 40-65 years participated in a randomized, double blind, cross-over study. Participants consumed a breakfast meal and 1-cup equivalent WBB drink or matched placebo beverage on two occasions. Participants completed cognitive tasks and had blood drawn before and at regular intervals for 8 h after each meal/treatment. Changes in episodic memory and executive function (EF) were assessed alongside plasma levels of glucose, insulin, and triglyceride. RESULTS: Analysis of the memory-related Auditory Verbal Learning Task (AVLT) word recognition measure revealed a decrease in performance over the test day after placebo intake, whereas performance after WBB was maintained. For the AVLT word rejection measure, participants identified more foils following WBB in comparison to placebo. Benefits were also observed for EF on the Go/No-Go task with fewer errors following WBB intake on cognitively demanding invalid No-Go trials in comparison to placebo. Furthermore, in comparison to placebo, response times were faster for the Go/No-Go task, specifically at 4 h and 8 h following WBB treatment. We also observed reduced post-meal glucose and insulin, but not triglyceride, concentrations in comparison to placebo over the first 2 h following ingestion. Though the addition of Age, BMI, glucose and insulin as covariates to the analysis reduced the significant effect of beverage for AVLT word rejection, metabolic outcomes did not interact with treatment to predict cognitive performance with the exception of one isolated trend. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated acute cognitive benefits of WBB intake in cognitively healthy middle-aged individuals, particularly in the context of demanding tasks and cognitive fatigue. WBB improved glucose and insulin responses to a meal. Further research is required to elucidate the underlying mechanism by which WBB improves cognitive function.
Authors: Robert Krikorian; Erin L Boespflug; David E Fleck; Amanda L Stein; Jolynne D Wightman; Marcelle D Shidler; Sara Sadat-Hossieny Journal: J Agric Food Chem Date: 2012-04-09 Impact factor: 5.279
Authors: Robert Krikorian; Marcelle D Shidler; Tiffany A Nash; Wilhelmina Kalt; Melinda R Vinqvist-Tymchuk; Barbara Shukitt-Hale; James A Joseph Journal: J Agric Food Chem Date: 2010-04-14 Impact factor: 5.279
Authors: Robert Krikorian; Matthew R Skelton; Suzanne S Summer; Marcelle D Shidler; Patrick G Sullivan Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-04-13 Impact factor: 6.706
Authors: Emma Flanagan; Donnie Cameron; Rashed Sobhan; Chloe Wong; Matthew G Pontifex; Nicole Tosi; Pedro Mena; Daniele Del Rio; Saber Sami; Arjan Narbad; Michael Müller; Michael Hornberger; David Vauzour Journal: Front Nutr Date: 2022-05-19
Authors: Ramona De Amicis; Sara Paola Mambrini; Marta Pellizzari; Andrea Foppiani; Simona Bertoli; Alberto Battezzati; Alessandro Leone Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-07-20 Impact factor: 6.706