Ashley L Miller1,2,3, Vinay K Rathi1,2,3,4, Ciersten A Burks1,2,3, Elliana Kirsh DeVore1,2,3, Regan W Bergmark2,3,5,6, Stacey T Gray1,2. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston. 2. Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Patient-Reported Outcomes, Value and Experience (PROVE) Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Importance: Women comprise an increasing proportion of the otolaryngology workforce. Prior studies have demonstrated gender-based disparity in physician practice and income in other clinical specialties; however, research has not comprehensively examined whether gender-based income disparities exist within the field of otolaryngology. Objective: To determine whether diversity of practice, clinical productivity, and Medicare payment differ between male and female otolaryngologists and whether any identified variation is associated with practice setting. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of publicly available Medicare data summarizing payments to otolaryngologists from January 1 through December 31, 2017. Male and female otolaryngologists participating in Medicare in facility-based (FB; hospital-based) and non-facility-based settings (NFB; eg, physician office) for outpatient otolaryngologic care were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: Number of unique billing codes (diversity of practice) per physician, number of services provided per physician (physician productivity), and Medicare payment per physician. Outcomes were stratified by practice setting (FB vs NFB). Results: A total of 8456 otolaryngologists (1289 [15.2%] women; 7167 [84.8%] men) received Medicare payments in 2017. Per physician, women billed fewer unique codes (mean difference, -2.10; 95% CI, -2.46 to -1.75; P < .001), provided fewer services (mean difference, -640; 95% CI, -784 to -496; P < .001), and received less Medicare payment than men (mean difference, -$30 246 (95% CI, -$35 738 to -$24 756; P < .001). When stratified by practice setting, women in NFB settings billed 1.65 fewer unique codes (95% CI, -2.01 to -1.29; P < .001) and provided 633 fewer services (95% CI, -791 to -475; P < .001). In contrast, there was no significant gender-based difference in number of unique codes billed (mean difference, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.217 to 0.347; P = .81) or number of services provided (mean difference, 5.1; 95% CI, -55.8 to 45.6; P = .85) in the FB setting. Women received less Medicare payment in both settings compared with men (NFB: mean difference, -$27 746; 95% CI, -$33 502 to -$21 989; P < .001; vs FB: mean difference, -$4002; 95% CI, -$7393 to -$612; P = .02), although the absolute difference was lower in the FB setting. Conclusions and Relevance: Female sex is associated with decreased diversity of practice, lower clinical productivity, and decreased Medicare payment among otolaryngologists. Gender-based inequity is more pronounced in NFB settings compared with FB settings. Further efforts are necessary to better evaluate and address gender disparities within otolaryngology.
Importance: Women comprise an increasing proportion of the otolaryngology workforce. Prior studies have demonstrated gender-based disparity in physician practice and income in other clinical specialties; however, research has not comprehensively examined whether gender-based income disparities exist within the field of otolaryngology. Objective: To determine whether diversity of practice, clinical productivity, and Medicare payment differ between male and female otolaryngologists and whether any identified variation is associated with practice setting. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of publicly available Medicare data summarizing payments to otolaryngologists from January 1 through December 31, 2017. Male and female otolaryngologists participating in Medicare in facility-based (FB; hospital-based) and non-facility-based settings (NFB; eg, physician office) for outpatient otolaryngologic care were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: Number of unique billing codes (diversity of practice) per physician, number of services provided per physician (physician productivity), and Medicare payment per physician. Outcomes were stratified by practice setting (FB vs NFB). Results: A total of 8456 otolaryngologists (1289 [15.2%] women; 7167 [84.8%] men) received Medicare payments in 2017. Per physician, women billed fewer unique codes (mean difference, -2.10; 95% CI, -2.46 to -1.75; P < .001), provided fewer services (mean difference, -640; 95% CI, -784 to -496; P < .001), and received less Medicare payment than men (mean difference, -$30 246 (95% CI, -$35 738 to -$24 756; P < .001). When stratified by practice setting, women in NFB settings billed 1.65 fewer unique codes (95% CI, -2.01 to -1.29; P < .001) and provided 633 fewer services (95% CI, -791 to -475; P < .001). In contrast, there was no significant gender-based difference in number of unique codes billed (mean difference, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.217 to 0.347; P = .81) or number of services provided (mean difference, 5.1; 95% CI, -55.8 to 45.6; P = .85) in the FB setting. Women received less Medicare payment in both settings compared with men (NFB: mean difference, -$27 746; 95% CI, -$33 502 to -$21 989; P < .001; vs FB: mean difference, -$4002; 95% CI, -$7393 to -$612; P = .02), although the absolute difference was lower in the FB setting. Conclusions and Relevance: Female sex is associated with decreased diversity of practice, lower clinical productivity, and decreased Medicare payment among otolaryngologists. Gender-based inequity is more pronounced in NFB settings compared with FB settings. Further efforts are necessary to better evaluate and address gender disparities within otolaryngology.
Authors: Jean Anderson Eloy; Leila J Mady; Peter F Svider; Kevin M Mauro; Evelyne Kalyoussef; Michael Setzen; Soly Baredes; Sujana S Chandrasekhar Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Annie E Arrighi-Allisan; Devki C Shukla; Annika M Meyer; Sarah M Kidwai; Sharon H Barazani; Maura K Cosetti; Marita S Teng Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2019-12-04 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Arghavan Salles; Michael Awad; Laurel Goldin; Kelsey Krus; Jin Vivian Lee; Maria T Schwabe; Calvin K Lai Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-07-03
Authors: Jennifer Rubin Grandis; William E Gooding; Beth A Zamboni; Marilyn M Wagener; Stephanie D Drenning; Lori Miller; Karen Jo Doyle; Susan E Mackinnon; Robin L Wagner Journal: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2004-06
Authors: Allison R Larson; Kelly A Cawcutt; Meridith J Englander; Susan C Pitt; Eman Ansari; Howard Y Liu; Julie K Silver Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-03-02