Literature DB >> 32743658

Impaired Sensorimotor Gating Using the Acoustic Prepulse Inhibition Paradigm in Individuals at a Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.

Qijing Bo1,2, Zhen Mao1,2, Qing Tian1,2, Ningbo Yang3, Xianbin Li1,2, Fang Dong1,2, Fuchun Zhou1,2, Liang Li4, Chuanyue Wang1,2.   

Abstract

Many robust studies have investigated prepulse inhibition (PPI) in patients with schizophrenia. Recent evidence indicates that PPI may help identify individuals who are at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR). Selective attention to prepulse stimulus can specifically enhance PPI in healthy subjects; however, this enhancement effect is not observed in patients with schizophrenia. Modified PPI measurement with selective attentional modulation using perceived spatial separation (PSS) condition may be a more robust and sensitive index of PPI impairment in CHR individuals. The current study investigated an improved PSSPPI condition in CHR individuals compared with patients with first-episode schizophrenia (FES) and healthy controls (HC) and evaluated the accuracy of PPI in predicting CHR from HC. We included 53 FESs, 55 CHR individuals, and 53 HCs. CHRs were rated on the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes. The measures of perceived spatial co-location PPI (PSCPPI) and PSSPPI conditions were applied using 60- and 120-ms lead intervals. Compared with HC, the CHR group had lower PSSPPI level (Inter-stimulus interval [ISI] = 60 ms, P < .001; ISI = 120 ms, P < .001). PSSPPI showed an effect size (ES) between CHR and HC (ISI = 60 ms, Cohen's d = 0.91; ISI = 120 ms, Cohen's d = 0.98); on PSSPPI using 60-ms lead interval, ES grade increased from CHR to FES. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for PSSPPI was greater than that for PSCPPI. CHR individuals showed a PSSPPI deficit similar to FES, with greater ES and sensitivity. PSSPPI appears a promising objective approach for preliminary identification of CHR individuals.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acoustic startle response; clinical high-risk individuals; prepulse inhibition; schizophrenia

Year:  2021        PMID: 32743658      PMCID: PMC7825103          DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Bull        ISSN: 0586-7614            Impact factor:   9.306


  56 in total

1.  Prodromal assessment with the structured interview for prodromal syndromes and the scale of prodromal symptoms: predictive validity, interrater reliability, and training to reliability.

Authors:  Tandy J Miller; Thomas H McGlashan; Joanna L Rosen; Kristen Cadenhead; Tyrone Cannon; Joseph Ventura; William McFarlane; Diana O Perkins; Godfrey D Pearlson; Scott W Woods
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Lower prepulse inhibition in clinical high-risk groups but not in familial risk groups for psychosis compared with healthy controls.

Authors:  Bilge Togay; Uğur Çıkrıkçılı; Zubeyir Bayraktaroglu; Atilla Uslu; Handan Noyan; Alp Üçok
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.732

3.  The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  Keith H Nuechterlein; Michael F Green; Robert S Kern; Lyle E Baade; Deanna M Barch; Jonathan D Cohen; Susan Essock; Wayne S Fenton; Frederick J Frese; James M Gold; Terry Goldberg; Robert K Heaton; Richard S E Keefe; Helena Kraemer; Raquelle Mesholam-Gately; Larry J Seidman; Ellen Stover; Daniel R Weinberger; Alexander S Young; Steven Zalcman; Stephen R Marder
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Attention-dependent early cortical suppression contributes to crowding.

Authors:  Juan Chen; Yingchen He; Ziyun Zhu; Tiangang Zhou; Yujia Peng; Xilin Zhang; Fang Fang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Meta-analysis of sensorimotor gating in patients with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Chia-Hsiung Cheng; Pei-Ying S Chan; Shih-Chieh Hsu; Chia-Yih Liu
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 6.  Sensorimotor gating and schizophrenia. Human and animal model studies.

Authors:  D L Braff; M A Geyer
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1990-02

Review 7.  Human studies of prepulse inhibition of startle: normal subjects, patient groups, and pharmacological studies.

Authors:  D L Braff; M A Geyer; N R Swerdlow
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Rethinking schizophrenia.

Authors:  Thomas R Insel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Deficits in prepulse inhibition and habituation in never-medicated, first-episode schizophrenia.

Authors:  Katja Ludewig; Mark A Geyer; Franz X Vollenweider
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  Sensorimotor gating, cannabis use and the risk of psychosis.

Authors:  T Winton-Brown; V Kumari; F Windler; A Moscoso; J Stone; S Kapur; P McGuire
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  2 in total

1.  Reduced Serum Levels of Soluble Interleukin-15 Receptor α in Schizophrenia and Its Relationship to the Excited Phenotype.

Authors:  Yi He; Qijing Bo; Zhen Mao; Jian Yang; Min Liu; Haixia Wang; Abba J Kastin; Weihong Pan; Chuanyue Wang; Zuoli Sun
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.157

2.  Interactions between the cortical midline structures and sensorimotor network track maladaptive self-beliefs in clinical high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Henry R Cowan; Katherine S F Damme; Vijay A Mittal
Journal:  Schizophrenia (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-09-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.