| Literature DB >> 32743496 |
Thariq Badiudeen1, Elizabeth A Forsythe2, Graham Bennett1, Hongliang Li2, Xichun Yu2, Marci Beel2, Zachary Nuss2, Kenneth E Blick3, Luis E Okamoto2, Amy C Arnold4,5, Sachin Y Paranjape4, Bonnie K Black4, Connor Maxey1, David C Kem2, Satish R Raj1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Activating autoantibodies (AAb) to adrenergic receptors (AR) have previously been reported in patients with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS). These AAb may contribute to a final common pathway for overlapping disease processes, reflecting a possible autoimmune contribution to POTS pathophysiology. In prior studies, measurement of AAb activity was inferred from costly, low-throughput, and laborious physiological assays. In the present study, we developed and validated an alternative cell-based bioassay for measuring AAb activity in serum by means of pre-treatment with monoamine oxidase (MAO).Entities:
Keywords: Adrenergic receptor; Autoantibody; Heart rate; Orthostatic tachycardia; Postural tachycardia syndrome
Year: 2019 PMID: 32743496 PMCID: PMC7388390 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2019.100006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Autoimmun ISSN: 2589-9090
Fig. 1Graphical representation of all POTS patients and control participants in the entire study, and by each assay conducted.
Demographic profiles of patients and controls with autoantibody assays.
| POTS (n = 36) | Controls (n = 57) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years±SD) | 26 ± 4 | 30 ± 11 | 0.02 |
| Females (n, %) | 36 (100%) | 56 (98%) | 1 |
| Family member with POTS (n, %) | 4 (11%)A | 1 (3%)B | 0.07 |
| Family member with autoimmune disease (n, %) | 12 (35%)C | 4 (7)D | 0.001 |
Fig. 2Comparison of recumbent serum and plasma norepinephrine (Panel A) and epinephrine (Panel B) in 10 control females age 20–30. Samples were drawn simultaneously. Serum was allowed to stand for 2 h on a counter at room temperature prior to processing. Plasma was iced and in EDTA.
Fig. 3Serum autoantibody-induced α1AR activation in cell-based assays with and without MAO pre-treatment in POTS patients and healthy control participants.
Fig. 4Panel A - Serum autoantibody-induced α1AR activation in cell-based assays. Individual participant values are presented. There was a significant increase in mean α1AR-activating autoantibody activity in the POTS group compared to Controls. Values are expressed as fold increase over buffer baseline. The dashed line represents the threshold for “elevated activity” (defined as 2SD above the mean control value). Panel B – The percentage of POTS patients and Control participants with “elevated” α1AR-activating autoantibody activity is shown.
Fig. 5Panel A - Serum autoantibody-induced β1AR activation in cell-based assays. Individual participant values are presented. There was a significant increase in mean β1AR-activating autoantibody activity in the POTS group compared to Controls. Values are expressed as fold increase over buffer baseline. The dashed line represents the threshold for “elevated activity” (defined as 2SD above the mean control value). Panel B – The percentage of POTS patients and Control participants with “elevated” β1AR-activating autoantibody activity is shown.