| Literature DB >> 32742642 |
S M Mitchell1,2, E J McKenzie3, C J Mitchell1,4, A M Milan1,5,6, N Zeng1, R F D'Souza1,7,8, F Ramzan1, P Sharma1, E Rettedal5, S O Knowles5, N C Roy1,2,5,6, A Sjödin9, K-H Wagner10, J M O'Sullivan1, D Cameron-Smith1,2,11.
Abstract
Diet has a major influence on the composition and metabolic output of the gut microbiome. Higher-protein diets are often recommended for older consumers; however, the effect of high-protein diets on the gut microbiota and faecal volatile organic compounds (VOC) of elderly participants is unknown. The purpose of the study was to establish if the faecal microbiota composition and VOC in older men are different after a diet containing the recommended dietary intake (RDA) of protein compared with a diet containing twice the RDA (2RDA). Healthy males (74⋅2 (sd 3⋅6) years; n 28) were randomised to consume the RDA of protein (0⋅8 g protein/kg body weight per d) or 2RDA, for 10 weeks. Dietary protein was provided via whole foods rather than supplementation or fortification. The diets were matched for dietary fibre from fruit and vegetables. Faecal samples were collected pre- and post-intervention for microbiota profiling by 16S ribosomal RNA amplicon sequencing and VOC analysis by head space/solid-phase microextraction/GC-MS. After correcting for multiple comparisons, no significant differences in the abundance of faecal microbiota or VOC associated with protein fermentation were evident between the RDA and 2RDA diets. Therefore, in the present study, a twofold difference in dietary protein intake did not alter gut microbiota or VOC indicative of altered protein fermentation.Entities:
Keywords: 16S amplicon sequencing; 16S rRNA, 16S ribosomal RNA; 2RDA, diet containing twice the RDA of protein; AMDIS, Automated Mass Spectral Deconvolution and Identification System; BCFA, branched-chain fatty acid; Fermentation; HS/SPME/GCMS, head space/solid-phase microextraction/GC-MS; MaAsLin, Multivariate Association with Linear Model; Microbiome; RDA, diet containing the RDA of protein; Recommended dietary intake; VOC, volatile organic compound; Volatile organic compounds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32742642 PMCID: PMC7372166 DOI: 10.1017/jns.2020.15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nutr Sci ISSN: 2048-6790
Participant characteristics pre-intervention
(Mean values, standard deviations and ranges; numbers of participants)
| Parameter | RDA group | 2RDA group | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Range | Mean | Range | |||||
| Number of participants | 15 | 13 | ||||||
| Age (years) | 74⋅7 | 3⋅9 | 70–81 | 73⋅7 | 3⋅3 | 70–79 | ||
| Height (cm) | 172⋅8 | 8⋅2 | 157–187 | 171⋅7 | 5⋅5 | 163–182 | ||
| Weight (kg) | 85⋅7 | 20⋅5 | 49⋅3–111⋅8 | 83⋅0 | 8⋅3 | 70⋅5–98⋅1 | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28⋅4 | 5⋅1 | 18⋅9–35⋅3 | 28⋅2 | 3⋅3 | 24⋅1–33⋅9 | ||
| Medication usage | ||||||||
| Statin | 4 | 6 | ||||||
| ACE inhibitor | 4 | 3 | ||||||
| Aspirin | 4 | 2 | ||||||
| Ca channel blocker | 1 | 2 | ||||||
| PPI | 0 | 2 | ||||||
| α-Blocker | 1 | 2 | ||||||
| β-Blocker | 1 | 2 | ||||||
| Xanthine oxidase inhibitor | 1 | 1 | ||||||
RDA, diet containing the RDA of protein; 2RDA, diet containing twice the RDA of protein; ACE, angiotensin converting enzyme; PPI, proton pump inhibitors.
Only the participants who completed the study were included in the analysis (n 28).
Fig. 1.CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) diagram. RDA, diet containing the RDA of protein; 2RDA, diet containing twice the RDA of protein.
Estimated composition of baseline (pre) and experimental diets (post) for the RDA and 2RDA groups
(Mean values and standard deviations)
| Nutrient intake | RDA | 2RDA | Effect ( | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | ||||||||
| Mean | Mean | Mean | Mean | Time | Diet | Time × diet | |||||
| Energy intake | 0⋅705 | 0⋅06 | 0⋅003* | ||||||||
| kJ/d | 13 104 | 4418 | 11 276‡ | 2502 | 9305† | 2707 | 11 627‡ | 715 | |||
| kcal/d | 3132 | 1056 | 2695‡ | 598 | 2224† | 647 | 2779‡ | 171 | |||
| Protein intake | |||||||||||
| Total (g/d) | 101 | 30 | 74‡ | 15 | 88 | 25 | 136†‡ | 10 | 0⋅041* | 0⋅001* | <0⋅001* |
| Relative (g/kg per d) | 1⋅2 | 0⋅4 | 0⋅9‡ | 0⋅1 | 1⋅1 | 0⋅3 | 1⋅7†‡ | 0⋅1 | 0⋅056 | <0⋅001* | <0⋅001* |
| Animal sourced (g/d) | 58 | 20 | 35‡ | 11 | 53 | 23 | 97†‡ | 6 | 0⋅016 | <0⋅001* | <0⋅001* |
| Plant sourced (g/d) | 43 | 16 | 48 | 9 | 35 | 9 | 47 | 4 | 0⋅002* | 0⋅177 | 0⋅185 |
| Estimated by N balance (g/kg per d) | 1⋅3 | 0⋅2 | 0⋅9‡ | 0⋅2 | 1⋅3 | 0⋅2 | 1⋅5†‡ | 0⋅1 | 0⋅098 | <0⋅001* | <0⋅001* |
| Energy from protein (%) | 13⋅7 | 4⋅4 | 11⋅2‡ | 1⋅5 | 16⋅5 | 4⋅4 | 19⋅7†‡ | 1⋅6 | 0⋅644 | <0⋅001* | 0⋅001* |
| Carbohydrate intake | |||||||||||
| Total (g/d) | 288 | 107 | 368 | 94 | 264 | 102 | 340 | 30 | 0⋅001* | 0⋅309 | 0⋅946 |
| Relative (g/kg/d) | 3⋅5 | 1⋅2 | 4⋅4 | 1⋅0 | 3⋅3 | 1⋅5 | 4⋅2 | 0⋅6 | 0⋅001* | 0⋅493 | 0⋅915 |
| Energy from carbohydrate (%) | 37⋅7 | 9⋅8 | 54⋅4‡ | 2⋅5 | 47⋅2† | 10⋅5 | 49⋅0† | 2⋅2 | <0⋅001* | 0⋅217 | 0⋅001* |
| Fibre intake (g/d) | 34 | 14 | 57‡ | 9 | 33 | 15 | 50‡ | 5 | <0⋅001* | 0⋅236 | 0⋅306 |
| Fruit and vegetables (serves/d) | 5⋅4 | 3⋅0 | 8⋅6‡ | 2⋅1 | 4⋅5 | 2⋅1 | 8⋅5‡ | 1⋅6 | <0⋅001 | 0⋅41 | 0⋅535 |
| Fat intake | |||||||||||
| Total (g/d) | 161 | 86 | 91‡ | 19 | 75† | 31 | 84 | 6 | 0⋅015* | 0⋅002* | 0⋅002* |
| Energy from fat (%) | 44⋅6 | 11⋅0 | 30⋅4‡ | 1⋅9 | 30⋅4† | 7⋅3 | 27⋅2† | 1⋅3 | <0⋅001* | <0⋅001* | 0⋅006* |
| Saturated fat (g/d) | 57 | 27 | 33‡ | 8 | 29† | 13 | 28† | 4 | 0⋅005* | <0⋅001* | 0⋅011* |
| Cholesterol (mg) | 387 | 142 | 299 | 83 | 351 | 113 | 527 | 73 | 0⋅106 | 0⋅003 | <0⋅001 |
| Alcohol (g/d) | 8⋅8 | 15⋅7 | – | 9⋅6 | 8⋅6 | – | – | 0⋅236 | – | ||
RDA, diet containing the RDA of protein; 2RDA, diet containing twice the RDA of protein.
* Significant main effect or interaction (P < 0⋅05).
† Different between diets at indicated time point. P values were controlled using the Sidak post hoc procedure.
‡ Different from pre-intervention within the same group (P < 0⋅05).
§ Main effects and interactions were calculated by two-way repeated-measures ANOVA. Modified from Mitchell et al.(, used with permission.
Fig. 2.Microbiota composition. Relative abundance at the genus level post-intervention in the RDA and 2RDA groups. RDA, diet containing the RDA of protein; 2RDA, diet containing twice the RDA of protein.
Fig. 3.Genera boxplots: the most abundant genera in the RDA and 2RDA groups. RDA, diet containing the RDA of protein; 2RDA, diet containing twice the RDA of protein. For the box plots: middle line is the median, boxes represent 25th and 75th percentiles, whiskers are within 1⋅5 interquartile ranges of the lower and upper percentiles, and dots represent outliers.
Fig. 4.α-Diversity. (a) Shannon's diversity; (b) Simpson's diversity. RDA, diet containing the RDA of protein; 2RDA, diet containing twice the RDA of protein. For the box plots: middle line is the median, boxes represent 25th and 75th percentiles, whiskers are within 1⋅5 interquartile ranges of the lower and upper percentiles, and dots represent outliers.
Fig. 5.β-Diversity. RDA, diet containing the RDA of protein; 2RDA, diet containing twice the RDA of protein.
Fig. 6.Principal component (PC) analysis of volatile organic compounds. RDA, diet containing the RDA of protein; 2RDA, diet containing twice the RDA of protein.
Important features identified by ANOVA simultaneous component analysis (ASCA) related to microbial fermentation*
| VOC | Leverage | SPE |
|---|---|---|
| Indole | 0⋅018 | 0 |
| 3-Methylbutanal | 0⋅018 | 8⋅63 × 10−32 |
| Butyrate, 2-methyl-, hexyl ester | 0⋅014 | 8⋅63 × 10−32 |
| 2-Butanol | 0⋅013 | 8⋅63 × 10−32 |
| Butyrate, 2-methyl-, propyl ester | 0⋅012 | 0 |
| Butyrate, 2-methyl-, butyl ester | 0⋅011 | 1⋅08 × 10−31 |
VOC, volatile organic compound; SPE, squared prediction error.
Table includes the compounds well modelled by the main effect of time.
Fig. 7.Volatile organic compound boxplots. RDA, diet containing the RDA of protein; 2RDA, diet containing twice the RDA of protein. For the box plots: middle line is the median, boxes represent 25th and 75th percentiles, whiskers are within 1⋅5 interquartile ranges of the lower and upper percentiles, and dots represent outliers.