Alexander Cm Chong1,2, Lisa N MacFadden1,3,4, Bruce E Piatt1,2,5, Benjamin C Noonan1,5. 1. Sanford Health- Department of Graduate Medical Education, Fargo, ND. 2. University of North Dakota - School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Grand Forks, ND. 3. Sanford Health - Sanford Sports Science Institute, Sioux Falls, SD. 4. Sanford Research, Sioux Falls, SD. 5. Sanford Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Fargo, ND.
Abstract
Introduction: A commonly utilized method of measuring femoral stem migration in total hip arthroplasty (THA) on plain anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiograph with referenced image magnification has not been rigorously evaluated. This study aims to validate the reproducibility of the methods used in this technique. Methods: A retrospective study of the standardized AP pelvis radiographs of patients who had undergone THA utilizing a Corail® femoral stem was performed from June 2012 through December 2017. Radiological evaluation (head diameter, stem length, and stem seating length) were undertaken at three clinical follow-up times. Each radiographic measurement of each radiograph was repeated five times. Outcomes investigated included inter- and intra-radiograph reproducibility evaluation and radiographic image magnification. The stem length error and stem subsidence were also evaluated. Results: Two hundred THA patients met the inclusion/ exclusion criteria. The intra-radiograph reproducibility of the stem length and head diameter measurements have at least "good" reproducibility with repeated measurements falling within 0.5 mm for both measurements. The reliability for femoral stem seating length measurements has "questionable/poor" reproducibility. The inter-radiograph reproducibility was, however, substantially lower. High level of unreliable measurements with values less than 0.0 mm for both femoral stem length errors (55%) and femoral stem subsidence (32%) measurements. Less than 45% accuracy (femoral stem length error: 33%; femoral stem subsidence: 44%) to within 3 mm error. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the assessment of radiographic implant migration after THA made on a sequence of plain AP pelvis radiograph have poor reproducibility.Level of Evidence: III.
Introduction: A commonly utilized method of measuring femoral stem migration in total hip arthroplasty (THA) on plain anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiograph with referenced image magnification has not been rigorously evaluated. This study aims to validate the reproducibility of the methods used in this technique. Methods: A retrospective study of the standardized AP pelvis radiographs of patients who had undergone THA utilizing a Corail® femoral stem was performed from June 2012 through December 2017. Radiological evaluation (head diameter, stem length, and stem seating length) were undertaken at three clinical follow-up times. Each radiographic measurement of each radiograph was repeated five times. Outcomes investigated included inter- and intra-radiograph reproducibility evaluation and radiographic image magnification. The stem length error and stem subsidence were also evaluated. Results: Two hundred THA patients met the inclusion/ exclusion criteria. The intra-radiograph reproducibility of the stem length and head diameter measurements have at least "good" reproducibility with repeated measurements falling within 0.5 mm for both measurements. The reliability for femoral stem seating length measurements has "questionable/poor" reproducibility. The inter-radiograph reproducibility was, however, substantially lower. High level of unreliable measurements with values less than 0.0 mm for both femoral stem length errors (55%) and femoral stem subsidence (32%) measurements. Less than 45% accuracy (femoral stem length error: 33%; femoral stem subsidence: 44%) to within 3 mm error. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the assessment of radiographic implant migration after THA made on a sequence of plain AP pelvis radiograph have poor reproducibility.Level of Evidence: III.
Authors: Tanner W Grant; Luke R Lovro; David J Licini; Lucian C Warth; Mary Ziemba-Davis; Robert M Meneghini Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Kee Hyung Rhyu; Se Min Lee; Young Soo Chun; Kang Il Kim; Yoon Je Cho; Myung Chul Yoo Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Ashleen Knutsen; Tigran Avoian; Sean L Borkowski; Edward Ebramzadeh; Lewis E Zionts; Sophia N Sangiorgio Journal: J Child Orthop Date: 2014-02-02 Impact factor: 1.548