Literature DB >> 32741711

High Offset Stems Are Protective of Dislocation in High-Risk Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Jonathan M Vigdorchik1, Abhinav K Sharma1, Ameer M Elbuluk1, Kaitlin M Carroll1, David J Mayman1, Jay R Lieberman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal stiffness has been shown to increase risk of dislocation due to impingement and instability. Increasing anteversion of the acetabular component has been suggested to prevent dislocation, but little has been discussed in terms of femoral or global offset restoration. The purpose of this study is to quantify dislocation rates after primary THA using standard versus high-offset femoral components and to determine how differences in offset affect impingement-free range of motion in a stiff spine cohort using a novel impingement model.
METHODS: A total of 12,365 patients undergoing THA from 2016 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed to determine dislocation rates and utilization of standard- versus high-offset stems. For 50 consecutive patients with spinal stiffness, a CT-based computer software impingement modeling system assessed bony or prosthetic impingement during simulated range of motion. The model was run 5 times for each patient with varying offsets. Range of motion was simulated in each scenario to determine the degree at which impingement occurred.
RESULTS: There were 51 dislocations for a 0.41% dislocation rate. Total utilization of high-offset stems in the entire cohort was 49%. Of those patients who sustained a dislocation, 49 (96%) utilized a standard-offset stem. The impingement modeling demonstrated 5 degrees of added range of motion until impingement for every 1 mm offset increase.
CONCLUSION: In the impingement model, high-offset stems facilitated greater ROM before bony impingement and resulted in lower dislocation rates. In the setting of high-risk THA due to spinal stiffness, surgeons should consider the use of high-offset stems and pay attention to offset restoration.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dislocation; hip-spine; impingement; offset; total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2020        PMID: 32741711     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  7 in total

1.  A study of femoral offset in the South Indian population and its clinical implications in hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gautam Kumar; Mohamed Jisam; Jacob Varghese; Julio C Kandathil; Bipin Theruvil
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-10-04

2.  In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Wayne Hoskins; Sophia Rainbird; Chelsea Dyer; Stephen E Graves; Roger Bingham
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 3.  The role of the femoral component orientation on dislocations in THA: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joost H J van Erp; Thom E Snijders; Harrie Weinans; René M Castelein; Tom P C Schlösser; Arthur de Gast
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.928

4.  Analysis of the Risk of Wear on Cemented and Uncemented Polyethylene Liners According to Different Variables in Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Basilio De la Torre; Loreto Barrios; Juan De la Torre-Mosquera; Julia Bujan; Miguel A Ortega; Carlos González-Bravo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Clinical and radiological results of high offset tri-lock bone preservation stem in unilateral primary total hip arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 3 years.

Authors:  Linbo Peng; Jun Ma; Yi Zeng; Yuangang Wu; Haibo Si; Bin Shen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Calculation of the 3-D femoral component's orientation in total hip arthroplasty using a trigonometric algorithm.

Authors:  Joost H J van Erp; Tom P C Schlösser; Ariënne W Baijense; Thom E Snijders; Rob Stevenson; Willem Paul Gielis; René M Castelein; Harrie Weinans; Arthur de Gast
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Spinopelvic Relationship and Its Impact on Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stefan Louette; Alice Wignall; Hemant Pandit
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-08-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.