Yinping Dong1,2, Yang Liu3, Jinhu Chen2, Wanhu Li4, Yongqing Li5, Qian Zhao2, Yiru Chen2, Wei Huang6. 1. School of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Jinan-Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China. 3. Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. 4. Department of Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China. 5. Department of Surgical Ward 1, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China. alvinbird@126.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the target volume of tumor bed defined by postoperative computed tomography (post-CT) in prone position registered with or without preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (pre-MRI). METHODS: A total of 22 patients were included with early-stage breast invasive ductal cancer, who have undergone breast-conservative surgery and received the pre-MRI and post-CT in prone position. The MRI sequences (T1W, T2W, T2W-SPAIR, DWI, dyn-eTHRIVE, sdyn-eTHRIVE) were delineated and manually registered to CT, respectively. The clinical target volumes (CTVs) and planning target volumes (PTVs) were contoured on CT and different MRI sequences, respectively. Differences were measured in terms of consistence index (CI), dice coefficient (DC), geographical miss index (GMI), and normal tissue index (NTI). RESULTS: The differences of delineation volumes among CT and MRIs were significant, both in the CTVs (p = 0.035) and PTVs (p < 0.001). The values of CI and DC for sdyn-eTHRIVE registration to CT were the largest among all MRI sequences, but GMI and NTI were the smallest. No obvious linear correlation (p > 0.05) between the CI derived from the registration of CT and sdyn-eTHRIVE of CTV with the breast volume, the cavity visualization score (CVS) of CT, time interval from surgery to CT simulation, the maximum diameter of the intraoperative mass, and the number of titanium clips, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The CTVs and PTVs in MRI sequences were all smaller than those in CT. The pre-MRI, especially the sdyn-eTHRIVE, could be used to optimize the post-CT-based target delineation of breast cancer. KEY POINTS: • Registered pre-MRI to post-CT in order to improve the accuracy of target volume delineation of breast cancer. • The CTVs and PTVs in MRI sequences were all smaller than those in CT. • The sdyn-eTHRIVE of pre-MRIs may be a better choice to improve the delineation of CT-based CTV and PTV.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the target volume of tumor bed defined by postoperative computed tomography (post-CT) in prone position registered with or without preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (pre-MRI). METHODS: A total of 22 patients were included with early-stage breast invasive ductal cancer, who have undergone breast-conservative surgery and received the pre-MRI and post-CT in prone position. The MRI sequences (T1W, T2W, T2W-SPAIR, DWI, dyn-eTHRIVE, sdyn-eTHRIVE) were delineated and manually registered to CT, respectively. The clinical target volumes (CTVs) and planning target volumes (PTVs) were contoured on CT and different MRI sequences, respectively. Differences were measured in terms of consistence index (CI), dice coefficient (DC), geographical miss index (GMI), and normal tissue index (NTI). RESULTS: The differences of delineation volumes among CT and MRIs were significant, both in the CTVs (p = 0.035) and PTVs (p < 0.001). The values of CI and DC for sdyn-eTHRIVE registration to CT were the largest among all MRI sequences, but GMI and NTI were the smallest. No obvious linear correlation (p > 0.05) between the CI derived from the registration of CT and sdyn-eTHRIVE of CTV with the breast volume, the cavity visualization score (CVS) of CT, time interval from surgery to CT simulation, the maximum diameter of the intraoperative mass, and the number of titanium clips, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The CTVs and PTVs in MRI sequences were all smaller than those in CT. The pre-MRI, especially the sdyn-eTHRIVE, could be used to optimize the post-CT-based target delineation of breast cancer. KEY POINTS: • Registered pre-MRI to post-CT in order to improve the accuracy of target volume delineation of breast cancer. • The CTVs and PTVs in MRI sequences were all smaller than those in CT. • The sdyn-eTHRIVE of pre-MRIs may be a better choice to improve the delineation of CT-based CTV and PTV.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Radiotherapy
Authors: Daniel M Landis; Weixiu Luo; Jun Song; Jennifer R Bellon; Rinaa S Punglia; Julia S Wong; Joseph H Killoran; Rebecca Gelman; Jay R Harris Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: K J Harrington; M Harrison; P Bayle; K Evans; P A Dunn; H E Lambert; Z Saidan; J Lynn; J S Stewart Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1996-02-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: H Bartelink; J C Horiot; P Poortmans; H Struikmans; W Van den Bogaert; I Barillot; A Fourquet; J Borger; J Jager; W Hoogenraad; L Collette; M Pierart Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-11-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: P Romestaing; Y Lehingue; C Carrie; R Coquard; X Montbarbon; J M Ardiet; N Mamelle; J P Gérard Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Harry Bartelink; Jean-Claude Horiot; Philip M Poortmans; Henk Struikmans; Walter Van den Bogaert; Alain Fourquet; Jos J Jager; Willem J Hoogenraad; S Bing Oei; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Marianne Pierart; Laurence Collette Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-06-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: X Allen Li; An Tai; Douglas W Arthur; Thomas A Buchholz; Shannon Macdonald; Lawrence B Marks; Jean M Moran; Lori J Pierce; Rachel Rabinovitch; Alphonse Taghian; Frank Vicini; Wendy Woodward; Julia R White Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038