| Literature DB >> 25033378 |
Jessica LaRusch1, Jinsei Jung2, Ignacio J General3, Michele D Lewis4, Hyun Woo Park2, Randall E Brand1, Andres Gelrud1, Michelle A Anderson5, Peter A Banks6, Darwin Conwell6, Christopher Lawrence7, Joseph Romagnuolo7, John Baillie8, Samer Alkaade9, Gregory Cote10, Timothy B Gardner11, Stephen T Amann12, Adam Slivka1, Bimaljit Sandhu13, Amy Aloe1, Michelle L Kienholz1, Dhiraj Yadav1, M Michael Barmada14, Ivet Bahar3, Min Goo Lee2, David C Whitcomb15.
Abstract
CFTR is a dynamically regulated anion channel. Intracellular WNK1-SPAK activation causes CFTR to change permeability and conductance characteristics from a chloride-preferring to bicarbonate-preferring channel through unknown mechanisms. Two severe CFTR mutations (CFTRsev) cause complete loss of CFTR function and result in cystic fibrosis (CF), a severe genetic disorder affecting sweat glands, nasal sinuses, lungs, pancreas, liver, intestines, and male reproductive system. We hypothesize that those CFTR mutations that disrupt the WNK1-SPAK activation mechanisms cause a selective, bicarbonate defect in channel function (CFTRBD) affecting organs that utilize CFTR for bicarbonate secretion (e.g. the pancreas, nasal sinus, vas deferens) but do not cause typical CF. To understand the structural and functional requirements of the CFTR bicarbonate-preferring channel, we (a) screened 984 well-phenotyped pancreatitis cases for candidate CFTRBD mutations from among 81 previously described CFTR variants; (b) conducted electrophysiology studies on clones of variants found in pancreatitis but not CF; (c) computationally constructed a new, complete structural model of CFTR for molecular dynamics simulation of wild-type and mutant variants; and (d) tested the newly defined CFTRBD variants for disease in non-pancreas organs utilizing CFTR for bicarbonate secretion. Nine variants (CFTR R74Q, R75Q, R117H, R170H, L967S, L997F, D1152H, S1235R, and D1270N) not associated with typical CF were associated with pancreatitis (OR 1.5, p = 0.002). Clones expressed in HEK 293T cells had normal chloride but not bicarbonate permeability and conductance with WNK1-SPAK activation. Molecular dynamics simulations suggest physical restriction of the CFTR channel and altered dynamic channel regulation. Comparing pancreatitis patients and controls, CFTRBD increased risk for rhinosinusitis (OR 2.3, p<0.005) and male infertility (OR 395, p<<0.0001). WNK1-SPAK pathway-activated increases in CFTR bicarbonate permeability are altered by CFTRBD variants through multiple mechanisms. CFTRBD variants are associated with clinically significant disorders of the pancreas, sinuses, and male reproductive system.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25033378 PMCID: PMC4102440 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004376
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Genet ISSN: 1553-7390 Impact factor: 5.917
Analysis of CFTR and SPINK1 variants in cases and controls.
| CFTR variant | %Cases | %Uctrls | OR | p-value | %Cases w/N34S | OR w/N34S | p-value w/N34S |
|
| 2.5 | 0.1 |
|
| 5.5 | 7.46 | 0.12 |
|
| 8.7 | 3.3 |
|
| 16.4 |
|
|
|
| 6.9 | 3.1 |
|
| 14.5 |
|
|
|
| 9.9 | 8.2 |
| 0.079 | 10.9 | 1.37 | 0.47 |
|
| 0.3 | 0.0 |
| 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.3 | 0.0 |
| 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.3 | 0.0 |
| 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.13 | 1.8 |
| ||
|
| 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.13 | 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.13 | 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.2 | 0.1 | 2.50 | 0.20 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
|
| 0.2 | 0.1 | 2.50 | 0.20 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
|
| 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.059 | 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.13 | 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.17 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.83 | |
|
| 14.2 | 9.8 |
|
| 25.5 |
|
|
|
| 6.3 | 6.2 | 1.02 | 0.30 | 16.4 |
|
|
|
| 2.4 | 1.4 | 1.69 | 0.052 | 1.8 | 1.30 | 0.80 |
|
| 2.3 | 0.7 |
|
| 5.5 |
|
|
|
| 1.1 | 0.2 |
|
| 1.8 |
|
|
|
| 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.82 | 0.26 | 1.8 | 1.84 | 0.55 |
|
| 0.4 | 0.0 |
| 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.25 | 0.29 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
|
| 0.3 | 0.0 |
| 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.3 | 0.1 | 3.02 | 0.17 | 1.8 |
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
| 76.1 | 74.2 | 1.11 | 0.14 | 70.9 | 0.85 | 0.59 |
|
| 57.3 | 57.8 | 0.98 | 0.29 | 45.5 | 0.61 | 0.071 |
|
| 39.6 | 39.5 | 1.01 | 0.30 | 40.0 | 1.02 | 0.94 |
|
| 13.4 | 10.9 | 1.27 | 0.016 | 14.5 | 1.40 | 0.42 |
|
| 10.3 | 9.7 | 1.07 | 0.26 | 12.7 | 1.36 | 0.45 |
|
| 7.6 | 7.9 | 0.95 | 0.28 | 7.3 | 0.91 | 0.86 |
|
| 4.5 | 4.1 | 1.10 | 0.26 | 1.8 | 0.43 | 0.39 |
|
| 1.0 | 1.4 | 0.72 | 0.19 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
|
| 0.7 | 1.2 | 0.58 | 0.11 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.41 |
|
| 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.58 | 0.21 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
|
| 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.13 | 0.29 | 1.8 | 4.03 | 0.17 |
|
| 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.99 | 0.17 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
|
| 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.42 | 0.088 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
|
| 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.75 | 0.27 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
|
| 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.89 | 0.21 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
|
| 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.85 | 0.29 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
|
| 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.63 | 0.27 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
|
| 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.26 | 0.30 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
|
| 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.26 | 0.30 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
|
| 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.13 | 0.0 | |||
|
| 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.17 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
Of the 81 CFTR mutations tested in the cohort, 43 were observed at least once in cases or controls. Data shown for CFTR variant alone and, in cases, with a concurrent heterozygous variant in SPINK1 N34S. *1001+11C>T is in linkage disequilibrium with F508del, risk calculation includes only 1001+11C>T not in cis with F508del. Blank cells indicate undefined (e.g. x÷0) **IVS8 T5 is reported but causes CF only when in cis with either R117H or IVS8 TG12or13. Intronic mutations are reported in standard nomenclature “####+/−##N>N” except IVS8-T5 (1210-12T[5]).
CFTR variants in subjects with chronic rhinosinusitis or male infertility (age >30 years).
| Rhinosinusitis | Yes | No | p-value | OR | CI | |
| Controls | 53 (10.2%) | 468 | - | - | - | |
| Cases (all) | 151 (15.9%) | 798 | 0.002 | 1.67 | 1.19–2.38 | |
| 0 | 111 | 649 | 0.021 | 1.51 | 1.05–2.18 | |
| 0 | 111 | 649 | 0.021 | 1.51 | 1.05–2.18 | |
| 1 | 14 | 50 |
|
|
| |
| 1 | 23 | 78 |
|
|
| |
| 1 | 37 | 128 |
|
|
| |
|
| 3 | 21 | 0.73 | 1.26 | NS | |
Top: Chronic rhinosinusitis in NAPS2 controls and cases with 0, 1, or 2 CFTR mutations. Bottom. Self-reported prevalence of male infertility among males over 30 years of age. Odds ratios were calculated comparing CFTR carrier cases in each subcategory against all controls. Because CFTR and CFTR both affect bicarbonate conductance, we calculated the association and risk associated with the presence of either variant type (shaded).
Figure 1Functional characteristics of the nine CFTR variants.
Panel a. Wild-type (WT) and variant CFTR proteins were expressed in HEK 293T cells and immunoblotted with anti-CFTR and anti-Aldolase antibodies. Replicate lanes are in small font. Band B, expected size of immature ER core-glycosylated CFTR; band C, mature complex-glycosylated CFTR. Panel b. Whole-cell Cl− currents were measured in WT and variant CFTR-expressing HEK 293T cells, as described in Methods. Panel c. Whole-cell currents of WT-CFTR were measured in HEK 293T cells co-expressed with WNK1 and SPAK using patch pipette contained a low concentration of Cl− (10 mM). A representative trace of reversal potential measurement is shown in the left panel. The permeability ratio PHCO3/PCl was calculated according to the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation. I–V relationships at the indicated points are presented in the accompanying graph. The conductance ratio GHCO3/GCl was calculated by measuring each outward current (i.e., slope between Erev and Erev+25 mV). RMP, resting membrane potential. Panel d. Whole-cell currents of R170H-CFTR were measured in HEK 293T cells using the same protocol shown in panel c. Panel e. A summary of the PHCO3/PCl values obtained from WT-CFTR in the standard state (left) compared to WT-CFTR and the nine CFTR variants with WNK1 + SPAK activation (right, underlined). Panel f. A summary of the GHCO3/GCl values in the standard state (left) with WNK1 + SPAK activation (right). Values throughout are means ± SEM. * p<0.05, **p<0.01: difference from WT in cells co-expressed with WNK1 and SPAK.
Figure 2Molecular modeling and simulations of CFTR WT and variants.
Panels a and b display the side and bottom views, respectively, of the WT CFTR dimer, where the two nucleotide-binding domains and the two membrane-spanning domains are labeled as NBD and MSD. The shaded region indicates the location of the lipid bilayer. Color key: black, subunit 1 of CFTR, with residues 1–859; blue, subunit 2, residues 860–1480; red CFTR variants studied. Panel c shows the charge distribution around D1152H: this negatively charged residue (left; shown in red space-filling representation) is surrounded by several positively charged residues (green), especially on its side of the cavity, creating an attractive force that keeps the residue from extending into the cavity. Also shown are other negatively charged residues (red stick or space-filling representation), including D385, diametrically opposite to D1152. Panel d shows the corresponding scene for the variant residue, D1152H (cyan), which can move toward the center of the cavity, thus leading to a constriction in the channel diameter. Channel diameter at the location of variant residues: Panel e shows the diameter of the channel at the location of L997, as a function of time, both for the WT (L997, green curve) and the variant (F997, red curve), based on closest interatomic distance between L997/F997 and D385. On panel f, the same information for the WT and variant D1152H is shown. In both plots, the pore diameter in the WT is larger than that stabilized in the mutants. The histograms of channel sizes are shown along the right ordinate.
Figure 3Location of selected variant sites with respect to the collective modes of the CFTR.
The left panel displays the relative motions of individual residues along the collective modes 1 (top) and 2 (bottom) intrinsically accessible to the two transporter subunits (residues 71–645 and 846–1445, respectively). These modes divide the CFTR structure into two groups of residues (colored red and blue in the ribbon diagrams) subject to opposite-direction motions. The pale blue/pink indicate the central locations (or hinge regions) mediating the concerted anti-correlated movements of the two groups. L967, D1152 and R1162 participate in the hinge region that modulates the concerted anti-correlated (opening/closing) movements of the two membrane-spanning domains in mode 2. Residues indicated by filled points (left curves) or yellow spheres (right diagrams) are R74, R75, R117, R170, L967, L997, D1152, R1162, S1235 and D1270.