OBJECTIVE: Familial risk for bipolar disorder (BD) or major depressive disorder (MDD) may lead to differential emotion processing signatures, resulting in unique neural vulnerability. METHOD: Healthy offspring of a parent with BD (n = 29, "BD-risk") or MDD (n = 44, "MDD-risk") and healthy control youths without any personal or family psychopathology (n = 28, "HC") aged 8 to 17 years (13.64 ± 2.59 years) completed an implicit emotion-perception functional magnetic resonance imaging task. Whole-brain voxelwise and psychophysiological interaction analyses examined neural differences in activation and connectivity during emotion processing. Regression modeling tested for neural associations with behavioral strengths and difficulties and conversion to psychopathology at follow-up (3.71 ± 1.91 years). RESULTS: BD-risk youth showed significantly reduced bilateral putamen activation, and decreased connectivity between the left putamen and the left ventral anterior cingulate cortex (vACC) and the right posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) during positive-valence emotion processing compared to MDD-risk and HC (Z >2.3; p <.001). Decreased left putamen-right PCC connectivity correlated with subsequent peer problems in BD-risk (β = -2.90; p <.05) and MDD-risk (β = -3.64; p < .05) groups. Decreased left (β = -0.09; p < .05) and right putamen activation (β = -0.07; p = .04) were associated with conversion to a mood or anxiety disorder in BD-risk youths. Decreased left putamen-right PCC connectivity was associated with a higher risk of conversion in BD-risk (HR = 8.28 , p < .01) and MDD-risk (HR = 2.31, p = .02) groups. CONCLUSION: Reduced putamen activation and connectivity during positive emotion processing appear to distinguish BD-risk youths from MDD-risk and HC youths, and may represent a marker of vulnerability.
OBJECTIVE: Familial risk for bipolar disorder (BD) or major depressive disorder (MDD) may lead to differential emotion processing signatures, resulting in unique neural vulnerability. METHOD: Healthy offspring of a parent with BD (n = 29, "BD-risk") or MDD (n = 44, "MDD-risk") and healthy control youths without any personal or family psychopathology (n = 28, "HC") aged 8 to 17 years (13.64 ± 2.59 years) completed an implicit emotion-perception functional magnetic resonance imaging task. Whole-brain voxelwise and psychophysiological interaction analyses examined neural differences in activation and connectivity during emotion processing. Regression modeling tested for neural associations with behavioral strengths and difficulties and conversion to psychopathology at follow-up (3.71 ± 1.91 years). RESULTS: BD-risk youth showed significantly reduced bilateral putamen activation, and decreased connectivity between the left putamen and the left ventral anterior cingulate cortex (vACC) and the right posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) during positive-valence emotion processing compared to MDD-risk and HC (Z >2.3; p <.001). Decreased left putamen-right PCC connectivity correlated with subsequent peer problems in BD-risk (β = -2.90; p <.05) and MDD-risk (β = -3.64; p < .05) groups. Decreased left (β = -0.09; p < .05) and right putamen activation (β = -0.07; p = .04) were associated with conversion to a mood or anxiety disorder in BD-risk youths. Decreased left putamen-right PCC connectivity was associated with a higher risk of conversion in BD-risk (HR = 8.28 , p < .01) and MDD-risk (HR = 2.31, p = .02) groups. CONCLUSION: Reduced putamen activation and connectivity during positive emotion processing appear to distinguish BD-risk youths from MDD-risk and HC youths, and may represent a marker of vulnerability.
Authors: A Manelis; C D Ladouceur; S Graur; K Monk; L K Bonar; M B Hickey; A C Dwojak; D Axelson; B I Goldstein; T R Goldstein; G Bebko; M A Bertocci; M K Gill; B Birmaher; M L Phillips Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Manpreet K Singh; Melissa P DelBello; Kevin E Stanford; Cesar Soutullo; Patricia McDonough-Ryan; Susan L McElroy; Stephen M Strakowski Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Brendan A Rich; Deborah T Vinton; Roxann Roberson-Nay; Rebecca E Hommer; Lisa H Berghorst; Erin B McClure; Stephen J Fromm; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-05-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Logan Borgelt; Stephen M Strakowski; Melissa P DelBello; Wade Weber; James C Eliassen; Richard A Komoroski; Wen-Jang Chu; Jeffrey A Welge; Thomas J Blom; Emily Rummelhoff; Maxwell Tallman; Jing-Huei Lee; Caleb M Adler Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Giuseppe Delvecchio; Philippe Fossati; Patrice Boyer; Paolo Brambilla; Peter Falkai; Oliver Gruber; Jarmo Hietala; Stephen M Lawrie; Jean-Luc Martinot; Andrew M McIntosh; Eva Meisenzahl; Sophia Frangou Journal: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2011-08-05 Impact factor: 4.600
Authors: Duncan C Honeycutt; Melissa P DelBello; Jeffrey R Strawn; Laura B Ramsey; Luis R Patino; Kyle Hinman; Jeffrey Welge; David J Miklowitz; Booil Jo; Thomas J Blom; Kaitlyn M Bruns; Sarah K Hamill Skoch; Nicole Starace; Maxwell J Tallman; Manpreet K Singh Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2022-06-20
Authors: Adina S Fischer; Bailey Holt-Gosselin; Kelsey E Hagan; Scott L Fleming; Akua F Nimarko; Ian H Gotlib; Manpreet K Singh Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2022-03-08
Authors: Akua F Nimarko; Aaron J Gorelik; Kayla E Carta; Mark G Gorelik; Manpreet K Singh Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 6.222