BACKGROUND: Offspring of parents with bipolar disorder (BD) (BO) are at higher risk of BD than offspring of parents with non-BD psychopathology (NBO), although both groups are at higher risk than offspring of psychiatrically healthy parents (HC) for other affective and psychiatric disorders. Abnormal functioning in reward circuitry has been demonstrated previously in individuals with BD. We aimed to determine whether activation and functional connectivity in this circuitry during risky decision-making differentiated BO, NBO and HC. METHOD: BO (n = 29; mean age = 13.8 years; 14 female), NBO (n = 28; mean age = 13.9 years; 12 female) and HC (n = 23; mean age = 13.7 years; 11 female) were scanned while performing a number-guessing reward task. Of the participants, 11 BO and 12 NBO had current non-BD psychopathology; five BO and four NBO were taking psychotropic medications. RESULTS: A 3 (group) × 2 (conditions: win-control/loss-control) analysis of variance revealed a main effect of group on right frontal pole activation: BO showed significantly greater activation than HC. There was a significant main effect of group on functional connectivity between the bilateral ventral striatum and the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (Z > 3.09, cluster-p < 0.05): BO showed significantly greater negative functional connectivity than other participants. These between-group differences remained after removing youth with psychiatric disorders and psychotropic medications from analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate that reward circuitry activation and functional connectivity distinguish BO from NBO and HC. The fact that the pattern of findings remained when comparing healthy BO v. healthy NBO v. HC suggests that these neuroimaging measures may represent trait-level neurobiological markers conferring either risk for, or protection against, BD in youth.
BACKGROUND: Offspring of parents with bipolar disorder (BD) (BO) are at higher risk of BD than offspring of parents with non-BD psychopathology (NBO), although both groups are at higher risk than offspring of psychiatrically healthy parents (HC) for other affective and psychiatric disorders. Abnormal functioning in reward circuitry has been demonstrated previously in individuals with BD. We aimed to determine whether activation and functional connectivity in this circuitry during risky decision-making differentiated BO, NBO and HC. METHOD:BO (n = 29; mean age = 13.8 years; 14 female), NBO (n = 28; mean age = 13.9 years; 12 female) and HC (n = 23; mean age = 13.7 years; 11 female) were scanned while performing a number-guessing reward task. Of the participants, 11 BO and 12 NBO had current non-BD psychopathology; five BO and four NBO were taking psychotropic medications. RESULTS: A 3 (group) × 2 (conditions: win-control/loss-control) analysis of variance revealed a main effect of group on right frontal pole activation: BO showed significantly greater activation than HC. There was a significant main effect of group on functional connectivity between the bilateral ventral striatum and the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (Z > 3.09, cluster-p < 0.05): BO showed significantly greater negative functional connectivity than other participants. These between-group differences remained after removing youth with psychiatric disorders and psychotropic medications from analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate that reward circuitry activation and functional connectivity distinguish BO from NBO and HC. The fact that the pattern of findings remained when comparing healthy BO v. healthy NBO v. HC suggests that these neuroimaging measures may represent trait-level neurobiological markers conferring either risk for, or protection against, BD in youth.
Authors: Benjamin I Goldstein; Wael Shamseddeen; David A Axelson; Cathy Kalas; Kelly Monk; David A Brent; David J Kupfer; Boris Birmaher Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Henry W Chase; Robin Nusslock; Jorge Rc Almeida; Erika E Forbes; Edmund J LaBarbara; Mary L Phillips Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2013-10-21 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Melynda D Casement; Tina R Goldstein; John Merranko; Sarah M Gratzmiller; Peter L Franzen Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2019 Nov/Dec Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Danella M Hafeman; Henry W Chase; Kelly Monk; Lisa Bonar; Mary Beth Hickey; Alicia McCaffrey; Simona Graur; Anna Manelis; Cecile D Ladouceur; John Merranko; David A Axelson; Benjamin I Goldstein; Tina R Goldstein; Boris Birmaher; Mary L Phillips Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Heather E Acuff; Amelia Versace; Michele A Bertocci; Cecile D Ladouceur; Lindsay C Hanford; Anna Manelis; Kelly Monk; Lisa Bonar; Alicia McCaffrey; Benjamin I Goldstein; Tina R Goldstein; Dara Sakolsky; David Axelson; Boris Birmaher; Mary L Phillips Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Adriane M Soehner; Michele A Bertocci; Anna Manelis; Genna Bebko; Cecile D Ladouceur; Simona Graur; Kelly Monk; Lisa K Bonar; Mary Beth Hickey; David Axelson; Benjamin I Goldstein; Tina R Goldstein; Boris Birmaher; Mary L Phillips Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: E Kale Edmiston; Jay C Fournier; Henry W Chase; Michele A Bertocci; Tsafrir Greenberg; Haris A Aslam; Jeanette Lockovich; Simona Graur; Genna Bebko; Erika E Forbes; Richelle Stiffler; Mary L Phillips Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2019-11-07
Authors: Manpreet K Singh; Akua F Nimarko; Amy S Garrett; Aaron J Gorelik; Donna J Roybal; Patricia D Walshaw; Kiki D Chang; David J Miklowitz Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 8.829