Christopher K C Lai1, Zigui Chen1, Grace Lui2,3, Lowell Ling4, Timothy Li2, Martin C S Wong5, Rita W Y Ng1, Eugene Y K Tso6, Tracy Ho2, Kitty S C Fung6, Siu T Ng2, Barry K C Wong6, Siaw S Boon1, David S C Hui2,3, Paul K S Chan1,3. 1. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR), China. 2. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. 3. Stanley Ho Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. 4. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. 5. School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. 6. United Christian Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Self-collected specimens have been advocated to avoid infectious exposure to healthcare workers. Self-induced sputum in those with a productive cough and saliva in those without a productive cough have been proposed, but sensitivity remains uncertain. METHODS: We performed a prospective study in 2 regional hospitals in Hong Kong. RESULTS: We prospectively examined 563 serial samples collected during the virus shedding periods of 50 patients: 150 deep throat saliva (DTS), 309 pooled-nasopharyngeal (NP) and throat swabs, and 104 sputum. Deep throat saliva had the lowest overall reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-positive rate (68.7% vs 89.4% [sputum] and 80.9% [pooled NP and throat swabs]) and the lowest viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) concentration (mean log copy/mL 3.54 vs 5.03 [sputum] and 4.63 [pooled NP and throat swabs]). Analyses with respect to time from symptom onset and severity also revealed similar results. Virus yields of DTS correlated with that of sputum (Pearson correlation index 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.86). We estimated that the overall false-negative rate of DTS could be as high as 31.3% and increased 2.7 times among patients without sputum. CONCLUSIONS: Deep throat saliva produced the lowest viral RNA concentration and RT-PCR-positive rate compared with conventional respiratory specimens in all phases of illness. Self-collected sputum should be the choice for patients with sputum.
BACKGROUND: Self-collected specimens have been advocated to avoid infectious exposure to healthcare workers. Self-induced sputum in those with a productive cough and saliva in those without a productive cough have been proposed, but sensitivity remains uncertain. METHODS: We performed a prospective study in 2 regional hospitals in Hong Kong. RESULTS: We prospectively examined 563 serial samples collected during the virus shedding periods of 50 patients: 150 deep throat saliva (DTS), 309 pooled-nasopharyngeal (NP) and throat swabs, and 104 sputum. Deep throat saliva had the lowest overall reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-positive rate (68.7% vs 89.4% [sputum] and 80.9% [pooled NP and throat swabs]) and the lowest viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) concentration (mean log copy/mL 3.54 vs 5.03 [sputum] and 4.63 [pooled NP and throat swabs]). Analyses with respect to time from symptom onset and severity also revealed similar results. Virus yields of DTS correlated with that of sputum (Pearson correlation index 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.86). We estimated that the overall false-negative rate of DTS could be as high as 31.3% and increased 2.7 times among patients without sputum. CONCLUSIONS: Deep throat saliva produced the lowest viral RNA concentration and RT-PCR-positive rate compared with conventional respiratory specimens in all phases of illness. Self-collected sputum should be the choice for patients with sputum.
Authors: Nikhil S Sahajpal; Ashis K Mondal; Sudha Ananth; Allan Njau; Pankaj Ahluwalia; Vamsi Kota; Kevin Caspary; Ted M Ross; Michael Farrell; Michael P Shannon; Sadanand Fulzele; Alka Chaubey; Madhuri Hegde; Amyn M Rojiani; Ravindra Kolhe Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Ngai Yung Tsang; Hau Chi So; Hiu Fai Ho; Gabriel M Leung; Dennis K M Ip Journal: Influenza Other Respir Viruses Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: Narasimha M Beeraka; SubbaRao V Tulimilli; Medha Karnik; Surya P Sadhu; Rajeswara Rao Pragada; Gjumrakch Aliev; SubbaRao V Madhunapantula Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Michael Huber; Peter Werner Schreiber; Thomas Scheier; Annette Audigé; Roberto Buonomano; Alain Rudiger; Dominique L Braun; Gerhard Eich; Dagmar I Keller; Barbara Hasse; Jürg Böni; Christoph Berger; Huldrych F Günthard; Amapola Manrique; Alexandra Trkola Journal: Microorganisms Date: 2021-03-19
Authors: Nikhil S Sahajpal; Ashis K Mondal; Sudha Ananth; Allan Njau; Pankaj Ahluwalia; Gary Newnam; Adriana Lozoya-Colinas; Nicholas V Hud; Vamsi Kota; Ted M Ross; Michelle D Reid; Sadanand Fulzele; Alka Chaubey; Madhuri Hegde; Amyn M Rojiani; Ravindra Kolhe Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-05-19