Literature DB >> 32737465

Tutorial: avoiding and correcting sample-induced spherical aberration artifacts in 3D fluorescence microscopy.

Erin E Diel1, Jeff W Lichtman1,2,3, Douglas S Richardson4,5.   

Abstract

Spherical aberration (SA) occurs when light rays entering at different points of a spherical lens are not focused to the same point of the optical axis. SA that occurs inside the lens elements of a fluorescence microscope is well understood and corrected for. However, SA is also induced when light passes through an interface of refractive index (RI)-mismatched substances (i.e., a discrepancy between the RI of the immersion medium and the RI of the sample). SA due to RI mismatches has many deleterious effects on imaging. Perhaps most important for 3D imaging is that the distance the image plane moves in a sample is not equivalent to the distance traveled by an objective (or stage) during z-stack acquisition. This non-uniform translation along the z axis gives rise to artifactually elongated images (if the objective is immersed in a medium with a higher RI than that of the sample) or compressed images (if the objective is immersed in a medium with a lower RI than that of the sample) and alters the optimal axial sampling rate. In this tutorial, we describe why this distortion occurs, how it impacts quantitative measurements and axial resolution, and what can be done to avoid SA and thereby prevent distorted images. In addition, this tutorial aims to better inform researchers of how to correct RI mismatch-induced axial distortions and provides a practical ImageJ/Fiji-based tool to reduce the prevalence of volumetric measurement errors and lost axial resolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32737465     DOI: 10.1038/s41596-020-0360-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Protoc        ISSN: 1750-2799            Impact factor:   13.491


  10 in total

Review 1.  Tutorial: practical considerations for tissue clearing and imaging.

Authors:  Kurt R Weiss; Fabian F Voigt; Douglas P Shepherd; Jan Huisken
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  TISSUE CLEARING.

Authors:  Douglas S Richardson; Webster Guan; Katsuhiko Matsumoto; Chenchen Pan; Kwanghun Chung; Ali Ertürk; Hiroki R Ueda; Jeff W Lichtman
Journal:  Nat Rev Methods Primers       Date:  2021-12-16

3.  The Modular µSiM: A Mass Produced, Rapidly Assembled, and Reconfigurable Platform for the Study of Barrier Tissue Models In Vitro.

Authors:  Molly C McCloskey; Pelin Kasap; S Danial Ahmad; Shiuan-Haur Su; Kaihua Chen; Mehran Mansouri; Natalie Ramesh; Hideaki Nishihara; Yury Belyaev; Vinay V Abhyankar; Stefano Begolo; Benjamin H Singer; Kevin F Webb; Katsuo Kurabayashi; Jonathan Flax; Richard E Waugh; Britta Engelhardt; James L McGrath
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 11.092

4.  Three-dimensional analysis of hydrogel-imbedded aortic valve interstitial cell shape and its relation to contractile behavior.

Authors:  Alex Khang; Quan Nguyen; Xinzeng Feng; Daniel P Howsmon; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 10.633

5.  An open-source semi-automated robotics pipeline for embryo immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Timothy Fuqua; Jeff Jordan; Aliaksandr Halavatyi; Christian Tischer; Kerstin Richter; Justin Crocker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A modular platform for automated cryo-FIB workflows.

Authors:  Sven Klumpe; Herman Kh Fung; Sara K Goetz; Ievgeniia Zagoriy; Bernhard Hampoelz; Xiaojie Zhang; Philipp S Erdmann; Janina Baumbach; Christoph W Müller; Martin Beck; Jürgen M Plitzko; Julia Mahamid
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 7.  Best practices and tools for reporting reproducible fluorescence microscopy methods.

Authors:  Paula Montero Llopis; Rebecca A Senft; Tim J Ross-Elliott; Ryan Stephansky; Daniel P Keeley; Preman Koshar; Guillermo Marqués; Ya-Sheng Gao; Benjamin R Carlson; Thomas Pengo; Mark A Sanders; Lisa A Cameron; Michelle S Itano
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 8.  Seeing the Forest and Its Trees Together: Implementing 3D Light Microscopy Pipelines for Cell Type Mapping in the Mouse Brain.

Authors:  Kyra T Newmaster; Fae A Kronman; Yuan-Ting Wu; Yongsoo Kim
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.856

9.  Theory of defect-mediated morphogenesis.

Authors:  Ludwig A Hoffmann; Livio Nicola Carenza; Julia Eckert; Luca Giomi
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 14.957

10.  A method for direct imaging of x-z cross-sections of fluorescent samples.

Authors:  A Katiyar; J D Antani; B P McKee; R Gupta; P P Lele; T P Lele
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 1.758

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.