Literature DB >> 32735657

Evolutionary and functional classification of the CARF domain superfamily, key sensors in prokaryotic antivirus defense.

Kira S Makarova1, Albertas Timinskas2, Yuri I Wolf1, Ayal B Gussow1, Virginijus Siksnys2, Česlovas Venclovas2, Eugene V Koonin1.   

Abstract

CRISPR-associated Rossmann Fold (CARF) and SMODS-associated and fused to various effector domains (SAVED) are key components of cyclic oligonucleotide-based antiphage signaling systems (CBASS) that sense cyclic oligonucleotides and transmit the signal to an effector inducing cell dormancy or death. Most of the CARFs are components of a CBASS built into type III CRISPR-Cas systems, where the CARF domain binds cyclic oligoA (cOA) synthesized by Cas10 polymerase-cyclase and allosterically activates the effector, typically a promiscuous ribonuclease. Additionally, this signaling pathway includes a ring nuclease, often also a CARF domain (either the sensor itself or a specialized enzyme) that cleaves cOA and mitigates dormancy or death induction. We present a comprehensive census of CARF and SAVED domains in bacteria and archaea, and their sequence- and structure-based classification. There are 10 major families of CARF domains and multiple smaller groups that differ in structural features, association with distinct effectors, and presence or absence of the ring nuclease activity. By comparative genome analysis, we predict specific functions of CARF and SAVED domains and partition the CARF domains into those with both sensor and ring nuclease functions, and sensor-only ones. Several families of ring nucleases functionally associated with sensor-only CARF domains are also predicted. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research 2020.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32735657      PMCID: PMC7498327          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  77 in total

Review 1.  Guilt by association: contextual information in genome analysis.

Authors:  L Aravind
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Recognition of a pseudo-symmetric RNA tetranucleotide by Csx3, a new member of the CRISPR associated Rossmann fold superfamily.

Authors:  Ece Topuzlu; C Martin Lawrence
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 3.  CRISPR-Cas adaptation: insights into the mechanism of action.

Authors:  Gil Amitai; Rotem Sorek
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Cyclic GMP-AMP signalling protects bacteria against viral infection.

Authors:  Daniel Cohen; Sarah Melamed; Adi Millman; Gabriela Shulman; Yaara Oppenheimer-Shaanan; Assaf Kacen; Shany Doron; Gil Amitai; Rotem Sorek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  The Phage Shock Protein Response.

Authors:  Josué Flores-Kim; Andrew J Darwin
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 15.500

Review 6.  Prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein modification.

Authors:  Julie A Maupin-Furlow
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 15.500

7.  Genotoxic, Metabolic, and Oxidative Stresses Regulate the RNA Repair Operon of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium.

Authors:  Jennifer E Kurasz; Christine E Hartman; David J Samuels; Bijoy K Mohanty; Anquilla Deleveaux; Jan Mrázek; Anna C Karls
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  The DNA-repair protein AlkB, EGL-9, and leprecan define new families of 2-oxoglutarate- and iron-dependent dioxygenases.

Authors:  L Aravind; E V Koonin
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2001-02-19       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Transcriptional regulator-mediated activation of adaptation genes triggers CRISPR de novo spacer acquisition.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Yingjun Li; Xiaodi Wang; Qing Ye; Huan Li; Yunxiang Liang; Qunxin She; Nan Peng
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Structural basis for the endoribonuclease activity of the type III-A CRISPR-associated protein Csm6.

Authors:  Ole Niewoehner; Martin Jinek
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 4.942

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Alternative functions of CRISPR-Cas systems in the evolutionary arms race.

Authors:  Prarthana Mohanraju; Chinmoy Saha; Peter van Baarlen; Rogier Louwen; Raymond H J Staals; John van der Oost
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Cyclic nucleotide-induced helical structure activates a TIR immune effector.

Authors:  Gaëlle Hogrel; Abbie Guild; Shirley Graham; Hannah Rickman; Sabine Grüschow; Quentin Bertrand; Laura Spagnolo; Malcolm F White
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 69.504

Review 3.  RNA-targeting CRISPR-Cas systems.

Authors:  Sam P B van Beljouw; Jasper Sanders; Alicia Rodríguez-Molina; Stan J J Brouns
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 78.297

4.  Evolutionary plasticity and functional versatility of CRISPR systems.

Authors:  Eugene V Koonin; Kira S Makarova
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Intrinsic signal amplification by type III CRISPR-Cas systems provides a sequence-specific SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic.

Authors:  Andrew Santiago-Frangos; Laina N Hall; Anna Nemudraia; Artem Nemudryi; Pushya Krishna; Tanner Wiegand; Royce A Wilkinson; Deann T Snyder; Jodi F Hedges; Calvin Cicha; Helen H Lee; Ava Graham; Mark A Jutila; Matthew P Taylor; Blake Wiedenheft
Journal:  Cell Rep Med       Date:  2021-05-27

Review 6.  The Cyclic Oligoadenylate Signaling Pathway of Type III CRISPR-Cas Systems.

Authors:  Fengtao Huang; Bin Zhu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  The Card1 nuclease provides defence during type III CRISPR immunity.

Authors:  Jakob T Rostøl; Wei Xie; Vitaly Kuryavyi; Pascal Maguin; Kevin Kao; Ruby Froom; Dinshaw J Patel; Luciano A Marraffini
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 69.504

8.  Estimating maximal microbial growth rates from cultures, metagenomes, and single cells via codon usage patterns.

Authors:  J L Weissman; Shengwei Hou; Jed A Fuhrman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 12.779

9.  Molecular mechanisms of the CdnG-Cap5 antiphage defense system employing 3',2'-cGAMP as the second messenger.

Authors:  Shirin Fatma; Arpita Chakravarti; Xuankun Zeng; Raven H Huang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Cyclic Tetra-Adenylate (cA4) Recognition by Csa3; Implications for an Integrated Class 1 CRISPR-Cas Immune Response in Saccharolobus solfataricus.

Authors:  Alexander A Charbonneau; Debra M Eckert; Colin C Gauvin; Nathanael G Lintner; C Martin Lawrence
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-12-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.