Literature DB >> 23466649

Randomized trial of clinical safety of daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate among HIV-uninfected men who have sex with men in the United States.

Lisa A Grohskopf1, Kata L Chillag, Roman Gvetadze, Albert Y Liu, Melanie Thompson, Kenneth H Mayer, Brandi M Collins, Sonal R Pathak, Brandon Oʼhara, Marta L Ackers, Charles E Rose, Robert M Grant, Lynn A Paxton, Susan P Buchbinder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical safety of daily tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) among HIV-negative men who have sex with men.
DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to immediate or delayed study drug (TDF, 300 mg orally per day, or placebo).
METHODS: Four hundred healthy HIV-uninfected men who have sex with men reporting anal sex with another man within the previous 12 months enrolled in Atlanta, Boston, and San Francisco. HIV serostatus, clinical and laboratory adverse events (AEs), adherence (pill count, Medication Event Monitoring System, and self-report), and sexual and other sociobehavioral data were assessed at 3-month intervals for 24 months. Primary outcomes were clinical safety, assessed by incidence of AEs and laboratory abnormalities.
RESULTS: Study drug was initiated by 373 (93%) participants (186 TDF and 187 placebo), of whom 325 (87%) completed the final study visit. Of 2428 AEs reported among 334 (90%) participants, 2366 (97%) were mild or moderate in severity. Frequencies of commonly reported AEs did not differ significantly between TDF and placebo arms. In multivariable analyses, back pain was more likely among TDF recipients (P = 0.04); these reports were not associated with documented fractures or other objective findings. There were no grade ≥3 creatinine elevations; grades 1 and 2 creatinine increases were not associated with TDF receipt. Estimated percentage of study drug doses taken was 92% by pill count and 77% by Medication Event Monitoring System. Seven seroconversions occurred: 4 on placebo and 3 among delayed arm participants not yet on study drug.
CONCLUSIONS: Daily oral TDF was well tolerated, with reasonable adherence. No significant renal concerns were identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23466649     DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31828ece33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr        ISSN: 1525-4135            Impact factor:   3.731


  78 in total

1.  Editorial Commentary: Scaling Up Antiretroviral Preexposure Prophylaxis: Moving From Trials to Implementation.

Authors:  Kenneth H Mayer; Douglas S Krakower
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Symptoms, Side Effects and Adherence in the iPrEx Open-Label Extension.

Authors:  David V Glidden; K Rivet Amico; Albert Y Liu; Sybil G Hosek; Peter L Anderson; Susan P Buchbinder; Vanessa McMahan; Kenneth H Mayer; Burns David; Mauro Schechter; Beatriz Grinsztejn; Juan Guanira; Robert M Grant
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 3.  Drug Resistance During HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis.

Authors:  Kevin M Gibas; Polly van den Berg; Victoria E Powell; Douglas S Krakower
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Acquisition of tenofovir-susceptible, emtricitabine-resistant HIV despite high adherence to daily pre-exposure prophylaxis: a case report.

Authors:  Stephanie E Cohen; Darpun Sachdev; Sulggi A Lee; Susan Scheer; Oliver Bacon; Miao-Jung Chen; Hideaki Okochi; Peter L Anderson; Mary F Kearney; Susa Coffey; Hyman Scott; Robert M Grant; Diane Havlir; Monica Gandhi
Journal:  Lancet HIV       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 12.767

Review 5.  Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Infection in the Older Patient: What can be Recommended?

Authors:  Iacopo Franconi; Giovanni Guaraldi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Evolving Models and Ongoing Challenges for HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Implementation in the United States.

Authors:  Kenneth H Mayer; Philip A Chan; Rupa R Patel; Charlene A Flash; Douglas S Krakower
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.731

7.  An HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Demonstration Project and Safety Study for Young MSM.

Authors:  Sybil G Hosek; Bret Rudy; Raphael Landovitz; Bill Kapogiannis; George Siberry; Brandy Rutledge; Nancy Liu; Jennifer Brothers; Kathleen Mulligan; Gregory Zimet; Michelle Lally; Kenneth H Mayer; Peter Anderson; Jennifer Kiser; James F Rooney; Craig M Wilson
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.731

8.  Simulating the End of AIDS in New York: Using Participatory Dynamic Modeling to Improve Implementation of the Ending the Epidemic Initiative.

Authors:  Erika G Martin; Roderick H MacDonald; Daniel E Gordon; Carol-Ann Swain; Travis O'Donnell; John Helmeset; Adenantera Dwicaksono; James M Tesoriero
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Implementation at Local Health Departments: A Statewide Assessment of Activities and Barriers.

Authors:  Helen L Zhang; Sarah K Rhea; Christopher B Hurt; Victoria L Mobley; Heidi Swygard; Arlene C Seña; Mehri S McKellar
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 10.  Global challenges in human immunodeficiency virus and syphilis coinfection among men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Chelsea P Roberts; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.091

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.