INTRODUCTION: The health authorities have recommended that face-to-face consultations be substituted by telephone consultations to reduce the risk of virus transmission in out-patient clinics during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The aim of the present study was to assess the frequency of such telephone consultations and families' evaluations of them in a paediatric outpatient clinic during the initial weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. METHODS: During the period from 16 March to 23 April 2020, telephone consultations substituting face-to-face consultations in children and adolescents from 0 to 19 years of age were prospectively recorded. In subsequent telephone interviews, families were asked about their views on the telephone consultation. RESULTS: During the observation period, the clinic had 499 scheduled face-to-face appointments and 112 (22.4%) substitute telephone consultations. A total of 103 families participated in a telephone interview representing 87 (84.5%) children with atopic diseases and 16 (15.5%) with other conditions. A total of 100 (97.0%) of the families agreed or strongly agreed that they felt good about being offered a substitute telephone consultation; 14 (13.6%) said that a telephone consultation was not the best option, whereas 89 (80.4%) would not have preferred a face-to-face consultation; 98 (95.1%) felt that the telephone consultation was useful to them. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of planned face-to-face consultations was substituted by telephone consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Families were satisfied with substitute telephone consultations. FUNDING: none. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant. Articles published in the DMJ are “open access”. This means that the articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
INTRODUCTION: The health authorities have recommended that face-to-face consultations be substituted by telephone consultations to reduce the risk of virus transmission in out-patient clinics during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The aim of the present study was to assess the frequency of such telephone consultations and families' evaluations of them in a paediatric outpatient clinic during the initial weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. METHODS: During the period from 16 March to 23 April 2020, telephone consultations substituting face-to-face consultations in children and adolescents from 0 to 19 years of age were prospectively recorded. In subsequent telephone interviews, families were asked about their views on the telephone consultation. RESULTS: During the observation period, the clinic had 499 scheduled face-to-face appointments and 112 (22.4%) substitute telephone consultations. A total of 103 families participated in a telephone interview representing 87 (84.5%) children with atopic diseases and 16 (15.5%) with other conditions. A total of 100 (97.0%) of the families agreed or strongly agreed that they felt good about being offered a substitute telephone consultation; 14 (13.6%) said that a telephone consultation was not the best option, whereas 89 (80.4%) would not have preferred a face-to-face consultation; 98 (95.1%) felt that the telephone consultation was useful to them. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of planned face-to-face consultations was substituted by telephone consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Families were satisfied with substitute telephone consultations. FUNDING: none. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant. Articles published in the DMJ are “open access”. This means that the articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Authors: Alex Bottle; Francesca K Neale; Kimberley A Foley; Russell M Viner; Simon Kenny; Paul Aylin; Sonia Saxena; Dougal S Hargreaves Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-08-08 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Marta Wanat; Melanie Eugenie Hoste; Nina Helene Gobat; Marilena Anastasaki; Femke Böhmer; Slawomir Chlabicz; Annelies Colliers; Karen Farrell; Sophie Hollerbach; Maria-Nefeli Karkana; John Kinsman; Christos Lionis; Ludmila Marcinowicz; Katrin Reinhardt; Ingmarie Skoglund; Pär-Daniel Sundvall; Akke Vellinga; Herman Goossens; Christopher C Butler; Alike van der Velden; Sibyl Anthierens; Sarah Tonkin-Crine Journal: BJGP Open Date: 2022-08-30
Authors: Tiago Torres; Marta Pereira; Maria João Paiva Lopes; Clarisse Rebelo; Pedro Andrade; Martinha Henrique; Hugo Oliveira; Paulo Ferreira; Gabriela Marques Pinto; Francisco Menezes Brandão; Jorge Rozeira; Paulo Filipe; Rui Tavares Bello Journal: Drugs Context Date: 2021-06-09