Literature DB >> 32734143

Effect of a pine enhanced biochar on growth performance, carcass quality, and feeding behavior of feedlot steers.

Stephanie A Terry1,2, Abby-Ann P Redman1,3, Gabriel O Ribeiro4, Alex V Chaves2, Karen A Beauchemin1, Erasmus Okine3, Tim A McAllister1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of enhanced biochar (EB) on growth performance, carcass quality, and feeding behavior of feedlot steers fed high-forage and high-grain diets. A total of 160 crossbred steers (initial 286 ± 26 kg body weight [BW]) were blocked by BW and randomly assigned to 16 pens (10 steers per pen), 8 of which were equipped with the GrowSafe system for monitoring feeding behavior. Treatments were EB included in the diet at 0% (control), 0.5%, 1.0%, or 2.0% (dry matter [DM] basis) with four pens per treatment. The backgrounding phase (84 d) was divided into four 21-d periods, and the finishing phase (112 d) was divided into four 28-d periods, with a 28-d transition period for dietary adaptation. Pen was the experimental unit for all parameters except for feeding behavior, where steer was considered the experimental unit. Treatment was included as a fixed effect, and period was considered a repeated measure. Total weight gain and overall average daily gain (ADG) tended to decrease (P = 0.06) with 2.0% EB. There was no effect (P ≥ 0.13) of EB on dry matter intake (DMI), gain-to-feed ratio (G:F), net energy for gain, ADG, or final BW for the backgrounding or finishing phases. There was a treatment × period effect (P < 0.05) of EB on DMI, ADG, and G:F for both backgrounding and finishing phases. Hot carcass weight, dressing %, back fat, rib-eye area, and meat yield were not affected (P ≥ 0.26) by EB. Lean meat yield was increased (P = 0.03) by 2.0% EB compared to all other treatments. Compared to the control, 2.0% EB increased (P = 0.02) the number of carcasses that achieved Canada 1 grade. More (P = 0.05) carcasses from control steers were graded as Canada 3 as compared to those fed 0.5% or 2.0% EB. Quality grade and incidences of liver abscesses were not affected (P ≥ 0.44) by EB. Enhanced biochar had no effect (P ≥ 0.11) on feeding behavior during backgrounding or finishing phases. In conclusion, EB did not result in changes in growth rate, feed efficiency, or feeding behavior in feedlot cattle, but 2.0% EB increased lean carcass yield grade. © Crown copyright 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  backgrounding; beef cattle; biochar; finishing

Year:  2020        PMID: 32734143      PMCID: PMC7201079          DOI: 10.1093/tas/txaa011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Anim Sci        ISSN: 2573-2102


  12 in total

1.  Wheat distillers grains in feedlot cattle diets: feeding behavior, growth performance, carcass characteristics, and blood metabolites.

Authors:  W Z Yang; Y L Li; T A McAllister; J J McKinnon; K A Beauchemin
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effect of engineered biocarbon on rumen fermentation, microbial protein synthesis, and methane production in an artificial rumen (RUSITEC) fed a high forage diet.

Authors:  Atef M Saleem; Gabriel O Ribeiro; Wenzhu Z Yang; Tao Ran; Karen A Beauchemin; Emma J McGeough; Kim H Ominski; Erasmus K Okine; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Feeding behavior and ruminal acidosis in beef cattle offered a total mixed ration or dietary components separately.

Authors:  D Moya; A Mazzenga; L Holtshausen; G Cozzi; L A González; S Calsamiglia; D G Gibb; T A McAllister; K A Beauchemin; K Schwartzkopf-Genswein
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Effect of diastatic power and processing index on the feed value of barley grain for finishing feedlot cattle.

Authors:  G O Ribeiro; M L Swift; T A McAllister
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Effects of monensin and tylosin in finishing diets containing corn wet distillers grains with solubles with differing corn processing methods.

Authors:  N F Meyer; G E Erickson; T J Klopfenstein; J R Benton; M K Luebbe; S B Laudert
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Effect of humic substances on rumen fermentation, nutrient digestibility, methane emissions, and rumen microbiota in beef heifers1.

Authors:  Stephanie A Terry; Gabriel de Oliveira Ribeiro; Robert J Gruninger; Martin Hunerberg; Sheng Ping; Alex V Chaves; Jake Burlet; Karen Ann Beauchemin; Tim Angus McAllister
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Effects of Hardwood Biochar on Methane Production, Fermentation Characteristics, and the Rumen Microbiota Using Rumen Simulation.

Authors:  Rebecca Teoh; Eleonora Caro; Devin B Holman; Stephen Joseph; Sarah J Meale; Alex V Chaves
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  A Pine Enhanced Biochar Does Not Decrease Enteric CH4 Emissions, but Alters the Rumen Microbiota.

Authors:  Stephanie A Terry; Gabriel O Ribeiro; Robert J Gruninger; Alex V Chaves; Karen A Beauchemin; Erasmus Okine; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-09-17

9.  Humic Substances Alter Ammonia Production and the Microbial Populations Within a RUSITEC Fed a Mixed Hay - Concentrate Diet.

Authors:  Stephanie A Terry; Aline F O Ramos; Devin B Holman; Tim A McAllister; Gerhard Breves; Alexandre V Chaves
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.