| Literature DB >> 32734037 |
Ishmael Festus Jaja1, Borden Mushonga2, Ezekiel Green3,4, Voster Muchenje1.
Abstract
Fasciolosis is an important zoonotic disease that is responsible for a significant loss in food resource and animal productivity. The objectives of this study were to determine the seasonal prevalence and risk factors associated with Fasciola infection in cattle. The results were obtained by coprology, antemortem and post-mortem survey of three abattoirs (HTPA1, n = 500, HTPA2, n = 400, and LTPA, n = 220). The seasonal prevalence of Fasciola infection was 10.4%, 12.8% and 10.9%, during summer, 11.2%, 10.8% and 8.6%, during autumn, 9.8%, 6.5% and 5.9% during winter and 8.2%, 7.8% and 5.9%, during spring in the three abattoirs HTPA1, HTPA and LTPA respectively. There was a significant association (p < 0.05) between the intensity of infection and body condition score (BCS) of cattle at each abattoir. Factors such as age [HTPA1 (OR = 3.6, CI = 1.2, 10.2), and LTPA (OR = 3.8, CI= 2.4, 6.1)], sex [LTPA (OR = 4.2, CI= 2.5, 7.0)], breed [HTPA2 (OR = 2.3, CI = 1.3, 4.1) and LTPA (OR = 2.5, CI= 1.3, 5.0)] and BCS had significant (p < 0.01-0.001) influence on the prevalence of fasciolosis. In conclusion, the infection with Fasciola spp was higher in the summer than in the winter; a positive association was established between the prevalence of fasciolosis and poor body condition in study animals. This study, therefore, suggests that fasciolosis could be causing substantial production losses, mainly due to cattle weight loss and liver condemnation.Entities:
Keywords: Abattoir; Body condition score; Bovine; Faecal egg count; Fasciolosis; Food safety; Seasonal prevalence; South Africa
Year: 2017 PMID: 32734037 PMCID: PMC7386735 DOI: 10.1016/j.vas.2017.06.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Anim Sci ISSN: 2451-943X
Fig. 1Map of Africa of Koppen climate classification system with a pointer showing the map of South Africa and the Eastern Cape Province (ECP).
Seasonal prevalence of bovine fasciolosis [HTPA1 (n = 500), HTPA2 (n = 400), and LTPA (n = 220)] in the liver and faecal samples from July 2013 to June 2014.
| HTPA1 | Winter | 125 | 49(23) | 39.2(18.4) | 0.9 | NS |
| Spring | 113 | 41(25) | 36.3(22.1) | |||
| Summer | 129 | 52(38) | 40.3(29.5) | |||
| Autumn | 133 | 56(42) | 42.1(31.6) | |||
| Total | 500 | 198(128) | 39.6(25.6) | |||
| HTPA2 | Winter | 100 | 26(17) | 26(17) | 19.5 | *** |
| Spring | 104 | 31(14) | 29.8(13.5) | |||
| Summer | 96 | 51(22) | 53.1(22.9) | |||
| Autumn | 100 | 43(46) | 43(46) | |||
| Total | 400 | 151(99) | 37.8(24.8) | |||
| LTPA | Winter | 53 | 13(8) | 24.5(15.1) | 5.5 | NS |
| Spring | 57 | 15(11) | 26.3(19.3) | |||
| Summer | 56 | 24(10) | 42.9(17.9) | |||
| Autumn | 54 | 19(14) | 35.2(25.9) | |||
| Total | 220 | 71(43) | 32.3(19.5) |
HTPA1 and HTPA2: high throughput abattoirs, LTPA: low throughput abattoir, X2: chi-square, No examined: number of animals examined, No positive: number of liver with Fasciola spp, Cprlg: coprology, Sig: significance level, ***: significant at p < 0.001, NS: not significant.
The association between various risk factors, body condition score and prevalence of bovine fasciolosis in cattle [HTPA1 (n = 500), HTPA2 (n = 400), and LTPA (n = 220)] from July 2013 to June 2014.
| Abattoirs | Risk factors | No examined (%) | P (%) | OR (95% CI) | X2 | Sig | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTPA1 | Age | Young | 355(71) | 30.80 | 1 | 7.30 | * |
| Old | 145(29) | 8.80 | 3.6 (1.2, 10.2) | ||||
| Sex | Male | 323(64.6) | 19.80 | 1 | 30.60 | *** | |
| Female | 177(35.4) | 19.80 | 1.1 (0.7, 1.4) | ||||
| Breed | Local | 185(37) | 22.60 | 1 | 56.70 | *** | |
| Crosses | 315(63) | 17.00 | 1.0 (0.5, 2.0) | ||||
| BCS | Poor | 161(32.2) | 21.60 | 1 | 75.60 | *** | |
| Moderate | 209(41.8) | 10.40 | 2.2 (1.1, 4.8) | ||||
| Good | 130(26) | 7.60 | 1.2 (0.9, 1.8) | ||||
| HTPA2 | Age | Young | 274(68.5) | 23.20 | 1 | 5.40 | * |
| Old | 126(31.5) | 14.50 | 1.1 (0.6, 2.0) | ||||
| Sex | Male | 219(54.8) | 11.20 | 1 | 60.90 | *** | |
| Female | 181(45.2) | 26.50 | 1.3 (0.8, 1.9) | ||||
| Breed | Local | 134(33.5) | 22.20 | 1 | 70.50 | *** | |
| Crosses | 266(66.5) | 15.50 | 2.3 (1.3, 4.1) | ||||
| BCS | Poor | 153(38.2) | 18.50 | 1 | 14.90 | *** | |
| Moderate | 146(36.5) | 13.00 | 3.8 (2.4, 6.1) | ||||
| Good | 101(25.2) | 6.20 | 2.5 (1.4, 4.6) | ||||
| LTPA | Age | Young | 85(38.6) | 18.20 | 1 | 13.90 | *** |
| Old | 135(61.4) | 14.10 | 3.8 (2.4, 6.1) | ||||
| Sex | Male | 145(65.9) | 29.10 | 1 | 27.40 | *** | |
| Female | 75(34.1) | 3.20 | 4.2 (2.5, 7.0) | ||||
| Breed | Local | 69(31) | 14.50 | 1 | 9.10 | ** | |
| Crosses | 151(68.6) | 17.70 | 2.5 (1.25, 5.0) | ||||
| BCS | Poor | 60(27.3) | 7.30 | 1 | 1.50 | NS | |
| Moderate | 97(44.1) | 15.90 | 1.2 (0.5, 2.5) | ||||
| Good | 63(28.6) | 9.10 | 0.8 (0.3, 1.8) | ||||
HTPA1, 2: high throughput abattoir, LTPA: low throughput abattoir, P: prevalence of fasciolosis, OR: odd ratio, CI: confidence interval, X2: chi-square, *: significant at p < 0.05, **: significant at p < 0.01, ***: significant at p < 0.001, NS: not significant.
Association between body condition score and severity of Fasciola spp. in slaughtered (n = 198, n = 151, n = 71) cattle from July 2013 to June 2014 in the three abattoirs (HTPA1, HTPA2, and LTPA).
| Classification by the level of intensity (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abattoir | BCS | Mild | Moderate | Severe | Total | X2 | Sig |
| HTPA1 | Poor | 23 (11.6) | 39 (19.7) | 20 (10.1) | 82 (41.4) | 45.4 | *** |
| Moderate | 67 (33.9) | 9 (4.5) | 20 (10.1) | 96 (48.5) | |||
| Good | 15 (7.6) | 5 (2.5) | 0 (0) | 20 (10.1) | |||
| Total | 105 (53.0) | 53 (26.8) | 40 (20.2) | 198 (100) | |||
| HTPA2 | Poor | 25 (16.6) | 30 (19.9) | 27 (17.9) | 82 (54.3) | 17.6 | *** |
| Moderate | 21 (13.9) | 20 (13.2) | 0 (0) | 41 (27.2) | |||
| Good | 10 (6.6) | 10 (6.6) | 8 (5.3) | 28 (18.5) | |||
| Total | 56 (37.1) | 60 (39.7) | 35 (23.2) | 151 (100) | |||
| LTPA | Poor | 0 (0) | 26 (36.6) | 20 (28.2) | 46 (64.8) | 51.5 | *** |
| Moderate | 5 (7) | 14 (19.7) | 0 (0) | 19 (26.8) | |||
| Good | 6 (8.5) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 6 (8.5) | |||
| Total | 11 (15.5) | 40 (56.3) | 20 (28.2) | 71 (100) | |||
N/B: HTPA1 and HTPA2: high throughput abattoirs, LTPA: low throughput abattoir, X2: chi-square, Sig: significant level, ***: significant at p < 0.001.