| Literature DB >> 32731984 |
W G Xia1, W Chen1, K F M Abouelezz2, D Ruan1, S Wang1, Y N Zhang1, A M Fouad3, K C Li1, X B Huang1, C T Zheng4.
Abstract
This study evaluated the optimal concentrations of dietary Se for the productive and reproductive performance, tibial quality, and antioxidant status in duck breeders aged 23 to 49 wk. In total, 432 Longyan duck breeders aged 22 wk were allotted randomly to 6 treatments, each with 6 replicates of 12 individually caged birds. The experiment lasted for 27 wk, and birds were fed corn-soybean meal-based diets containing 0.11, 0.19, 0.27, 0.35, 0.43, or 0.51 mg Se/kg, respectively. The tested dietary Se levels did not affect egg production and tibial quality of duck breeders. The Se contents of the shell, yolk or albumin, whole egg, and the fertility of set eggs increased in a linear and quadratic manner (P < 0.05) in response to the increased dietary Se level, whereas the yolk malondialdehyde (MDA) and embryonic mortality decreased. The activities of glutathione peroxidase 3 (Gpx3) in plasma and Gpx1 in the erythrocytes and livers of breeder ducks increased in a linear and quadratic manner (P < 0.05) in response to increased dietary Se levels, whereas the total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD) activity increased and the MDA concentration decreased in the liver. The activity of Gpx3 in the plasma and Gpx1 in the erythrocytes and livers of newly hatched ducklings increased linearly (P < 0.01) with the increase in Se level, whereas the T-SOD activity and MDA concentration did not change. In conclusion, diets containing 0.27 mg Se/kg led to the highest egg fertility and hatchability in Longyan duck breeders, and using levels >0.19 mg Se/kg diet enhanced the antioxidant capacity in breeders and their offspring. The regression model indicated that dietary Se levels 0.19, 0.27, 0.28, 0.24, and 0.30 mg/kg are optimal levels to obtain maximum Se deposition efficiency in eggs, egg fertility, Gpx1 activity in erythrocytes and liver in duck breeders, and plasma activity of Gpx3 in newly hatched ducklings, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: Se; antioxidant capacity; duck breeder; reproductive performance
Year: 2020 PMID: 32731984 PMCID: PMC7597912 DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.04.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Poult Sci ISSN: 0032-5791 Impact factor: 3.352
Composition and nutrient levels in the basal diet of laying duck breeders (%, as fed basis).
| Ingredients | Percentage (%) | Nutrient composition | Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corn | 52.30 | AME, MJ/kg | 10.45 |
| Soybean meal | 26.10 | CP, % | 18.0 |
| Wheat bran | 10.15 | Ca, % | 3.60 |
| Limestone | 8.70 | Total P, % | 0.60 |
| Calcium hydrogen phosphate | 1.30 | Available P, % | 0.35 |
| DL-methionine | 0.15 | Total Lys, % | 0.95 |
| Salt | 0.30 | Total Met, % | 0.40 |
| Premix | 1.00 | Total Met + Cys, % | 0.70 |
| Total | 100 | Se, mg/kg | 0.11 |
The premix provided the following (per kilogram of diet): vitamin A 12,000 IU, vitamin D3 1,800 IU, vitamin E 26 IU, vitamin K 1.0 mg, vitamin B1 3.0 mg, vitamin B2 9.6 mg, vitamin B6 6.0 mg, vitamin B12 0.03 mg, choline 500 mg, D-calcium pantothenate 28.5 mg, folic acid 0.6 mg, biotin 0.15 mg, Fe 50 mg, Cu 10 mg, Mn 90 mg, Zn 90 mg, I 0.50 mg.
Se content was measured in the mixed feed. Other nutrient levels are calculated values.
Effects of dietary Se levels on laying performance of duck breeders aged 23 to 49 wk1.
| Item | Dietary Se (mg/kg) | SEM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.51 | Se | ||
| Early-laying period (50% < egg production < 80%, 23–25 wk of age) | ||||||||
| Feed intake (g/D) | 142 | 142 | 142 | 141 | 141 | 142 | 0.34 | NS |
| Egg production (%) | 72.9 | 65.7 | 66.8 | 67.8 | 74.6 | 77.0 | 3.30 | NS |
| Egg weight (g) | 47.8 | 50.0 | 48.3 | 50.1 | 49.2 | 50.6 | 0.79 | NS |
| Egg mass (g/D) | 35.1 | 32.9 | 32.2 | 33.9 | 36.9 | 39.0 | 1.82 | NS |
| Feed conversion (g/g) | 4.19 | 4.45 | 4.51 | 4.27 | 3.92 | 3.71 | 0.20 | NS |
| Peak-laying period (egg production >80%, 26–49 wk of age) | ||||||||
| Feed intake (g/D) | 163 | 164 | 163 | 164 | 163 | 164 | 0.30 | NS |
| Egg production (%) | 88.9 | 87.9 | 86.8 | 88.2 | 87.7 | 89.3 | 1.24 | NS |
| Egg weight (g) | 62.5 | 62.4 | 62.6 | 63.1 | 62.9 | 63.4 | 0.32 | NS |
| Egg mass (g/D) | 56.1 | 55.1 | 55.1 | 55.4 | 55.1 | 56.5 | 0.68 | NS |
| Feed conversion (g/g) | 2.93 | 3.00 | 2.98 | 2.97 | 2.98 | 2.92 | 0.04 | NS |
| Whole laying period (23–49 wk of age) | ||||||||
| Feed intake (g/D) | 162 | 162 | 162 | 162 | 162 | 162 | 0.27 | NS |
| Egg production (%) | 87.9 | 86.5 | 85.5 | 87.0 | 86.9 | 88.5 | 1.25 | NS |
| Egg weight (g) | 61.6 | 61.7 | 61.6 | 62.3 | 62.1 | 62.6 | 0.32 | NS |
| Egg mass (g/D) | 54.9 | 53.7 | 53.7 | 54.1 | 53.9 | 55.4 | 0.66 | NS |
| Feed conversion (g/g) | 2.96 | 3.03 | 3.02 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.94 | 0.04 | NS |
Data are means for n = 6 replicates (12 birds/replicate).
Se: treatment effect; linear and quadratic effects were not significant; NS: no significance (P > 0.05).
Effects of dietary Se levels on Se deposition in the whole egg and yolk MDA content of duck breeders aged 45 wk1.
| Item | Dietary Se (mg/kg) | SEM | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.51 | Se | L | Q | ||
| Daily Se intake (μg) | 17.8 | 30.8 | 43.7 | 56.7 | 69.7 | 82.6 | 0.09 | <0.01 | <0.01 | NS |
| Se content of yolk and albumin (μg) | 6.77 | 14.8 | 20.7 | 21.2 | 22.5 | 26.9 | 1.05 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| Se content of shell (μg) | 6.17 | 7.62 | 8.73 | 9.68 | 9.34 | 9.38 | 0.53 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.05 |
| Se content in egg (μg) | 12.9 | 22.4 | 29.4 | 30.9 | 31.9 | 36.3 | 1.29 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.05 |
| Se deposition efficiency (%) | 72.6 | 72.8 | 67.2 | 54.5 | 45.7 | 44.0 | 3.50 | <0.01 | <0.01 | NS |
| Yolk MDA (nmol/mL) | 131 | 127 | 110 | 109 | 82.7 | 38.8 | 12.2 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.05 |
Abbreviation: MDA, malondialdehyde.
Data are means for n = 6 replicates (3 eggs/replicate).
Se: treatment effect; L: linear effect; Q: quadratic effect; NS: no significance (P > 0.05).
Regression equation based on dietary Se level (mg/kg); broken linear equation: Y = 72.6 + 98.7 × (0.19 − Se), Se ≤ 0.19; Y = 72.6, Se > 0.19; R2 = 0.96, P-value < 0.01, yielded the optimized dietary Se value of 0.19 mg/kg.
Effects of dietary Se levels on the incubation indices of duck breeders aged 40 wk1.
| Item | Dietary Se (mg/kg) | SEM | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.51 | Se | L | Q | ||
| Fertility of set eggs (%) | 74.5 | 79.5 | 88.3 | 85.6 | 87.2 | 86.3 | 2.57 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.05 |
| Embryonic mortality (%) | 29.5 | 26.6 | 12.8 | 26.8 | 28.2 | 18.7 | 2.76 | <0.01 | NS | NS |
| Hatchability of fertile eggs (%) | 69.5 | 70.1 | 83.9 | 69.4 | 71.8 | 80.2 | 2.71 | <0.01 | NS | NS |
| Healthy duckling (%) | 96.5 | 99.4 | 98.5 | 98.8 | 98.5 | 99.5 | 0.87 | NS | NS | NS |
| Duckling weight (g) | 37.0 | 37.9 | 37.5 | 38.1 | 37.7 | 37.3 | 0.44 | NS | NS | NS |
Data are means for n = 6 replicates (50 eggs/replicate).
Se: treatment effect; L: linear effect; Q: quadratic effect; NS: no significance (P > 0.05).
Regression equation based on dietary Se level (mg/kg); broken linear equation: Y = 86.7 − 81.1 × (0.27 − Se), Se ≤ 0.27; Y = 86.7, Se > 0.27; R2 = 0.99, P-value < 0.01, yielded the optimized dietary Se value of 0.27 mg/kg.
Effects of dietary Se levels on tibial quality of duck breeders aged 49 wk1.
| Item | Dietary Se (mg/kg) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.51 | SEM | Se | |
| Tibial fresh weight (g) | 5.38 | 5.57 | 5.43 | 5.60 | 5.03 | 5.28 | 0.17 | NS |
| Tibial dry weight (g) | 3.30 | 3.36 | 3.32 | 3.35 | 3.12 | 3.29 | 0.10 | NS |
| Tibial length (mm) | 98.7 | 98.8 | 98.6 | 98.3 | 97.4 | 98.8 | 0.79 | NS |
| Tibial width (mm) | 6.04 | 5.91 | 5.92 | 6.08 | 5.92 | 5.82 | 0.10 | NS |
| Mineral density (g/cm3) | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.01 | NS |
| Mineral content (g) | 1.39 | 1.40 | 1.53 | 1.53 | 1.35 | 1.47 | 0.06 | NS |
Data are means for n = 6 replicates (2 birds/replicate).
Se: treatment effect; linear and quadratic effects were not significant; NS: no significance (P > 0.05).
Effects of dietary Se levels on antioxidative indices in plasma, erythrocytes, and liver of duck breeders aged 49 wk1.
| Item | Dietary Se (mg/kg) | SEM | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.51 | Se | L | Q | ||
| Plasma | ||||||||||
| T-SOD (U/mL) | 17.7 | 17.3 | 17.5 | 19.7 | 17.4 | 17.9 | 1.25 | NS | NS | NS |
| Gpx3 (U/mL) | 313 | 509 | 497 | 489 | 493 | 594 | 28.3 | <0.01 | <0.01 | NS |
| MDA(nmol/mL) | 4.71 | 4.84 | 5.72 | 5.54 | 6.25 | 6.49 | 0.52 | NS | NS | NS |
| Erythrocytes | ||||||||||
| Gpx1 (U/mg protein) | 176 | 295 | 349 | 378 | 368 | 353 | 21.4 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.05 |
| Liver | ||||||||||
| T-SOD (U/mg protein) | 276 | 294 | 319 | 250 | 261 | 253 | 8.87 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.05 |
| Gpx1 (U/mg protein) | 40.6 | 288 | 449 | 411 | 427 | 485 | 12.0 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| MDA(nmol/mg protein) | 0.70 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.59 | 0.11 | <0.05 | NS | <0.01 |
Data are means for n = 6 replicates (2 birds or 3 eggs/replicate).
T-SOD: total superoxide dismutase; Gpx3: glutathione peroxidase 3; MDA: malondialdehyde; Gpx1: glutathione peroxidase 1.
Se: treatment effect; L: linear effect; Q: quadratic effect; NS: no significance (P > 0.05).
Regression equation based on dietary Se level (mg/kg); broken linear equation: Y (erythrocyte Gpx1) = 366.3 − 1081.2 × (0.28 − Se), Se ≤ 0.28; Y (erythrocyte Gpx1) = 366.3, Se > 0.28; R2 = 0.96, P-value < 0.01. Y (liver Gpx1) = 443 − 3092.5 × (0.24 − Se), Se ≤ 0.24; Y (liver Gpx1) = 443, Se > 0.24; R2 = 0.98, P-value < 0.01. These equations yielded the optimized dietary Se value of 0.28 and 0.24 mg/kg.
Effects of dietary Se levels on antioxidative indices in plasma, erythrocytes, and liver of hatchlings1.
| Item | Dietary Se (mg/kg) | SEM | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.51 | Se | L | Q | ||
| Plasma | ||||||||||
| T-SOD (U/mL) | 94.7 | 95.6 | 104 | 108 | 110 | 104 | 5.57 | NS | NS | NS |
| Gpx3 (U/mL) | 452 | 772 | 890 | 1,022 | 987 | 1,026 | 53.2 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| MDA(nmol/mL) | 7.66 | 6.95 | 6.00 | 6.04 | 7.18 | 7.62 | 0.65 | NS | NS | NS |
| Erythrocyte | ||||||||||
| Gpx1 (U/mg protein) | 184 | 244 | 231 | 252 | 243 | 273 | 13.3 | <0.01 | <0.01 | NS |
| Liver | ||||||||||
| T-SOD (U/mg protein) | 567 | 557 | 566 | 507 | 537 | 539 | 14.4 | NS | NS | NS |
| Gpx1 (U/mg protein) | 167 | 275 | 407 | 364 | 420 | 374 | 11.1 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| MDA(nmol/mg protein) | 0.76 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.48 | 0.57 | 0.48 | 0.07 | NS | NS | NS |
Data are means for n = 6 replicates (2 birds/replicate).
T-SOD: total superoxide dismutase; Gpx3: glutathione peroxidase 3; MDA: malondialdehyde; Gpx1: glutathione peroxidase 1.
Se: treatment effect; L: linear effect; Q: quadratic effect; NS: no significance (P > 0.05).
Regression equation based on dietary Se level (mg/kg); broken linear equation: Y = 1,012 − 2,738 × (0.30 − Se), Se ≤ 0.30; Y = 1,012, Se > 0.30; R2 = 0.97, P-value < 0.01, yielded the optimized dietary Se value of 0.30 mg/kg.