| Literature DB >> 32731484 |
Hanan Ahmed1, Arpa Ghoshal1, Sarah Jones1, Ian Ellis1, Mohammad Islam1.
Abstract
The signalling pathways involved in metastasis of oral adenoid cancer cells (TYS) in response to cancer-associated fibroblasts (COM D24) and normal oral mucosal fibroblasts (MM1) was examined. Metastatic cell behaviour was observed by cell-scatter, 3-D-collagen gel migration, and 3-D-spheroid invasion assays. Akt (v-Akt murine thymoma viral oncogene), MAPK(Mitogen activated protein kinase), EGFR (Epidermal growth factor receptor), TGFβRI (Transforming growth factor beta receptor 1), and CXCR4 (C-X-C chemokine receptor 4) inhibitors were used to identify the signalling pathways involved. Signalling pathway protein expression and activation were assessed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting. COM-CM (conditioned medium from COM D24 cells) and MM1-CM (conditioned medium from MM1 cells) stimulated cancer cell scattering, which was blocked only by the Akt inhibitor. COM-CM-induced scattered cancer cells showed higher levels of Akt phosphorylation than the negative control and MM1-CM. Migration and invasion of TYS cells into collagen gels from the spheroids was stimulated by CM from both fibroblast cell lines, compared to the negative control. COM cells stimulated TYS invasion into the collagen more than MM1 and the control. Akt and EGFR inhibitors effectively blocked CM and COM cell-induced invasion. Akt-silenced cancer cells were not stimulated to migrate and invade by fibroblast-CM and did not survive the addition of an EGFR inhibitor. This suggests that CAFs stimulate head and neck cancer cell migration and invasion in an Akt- dependent manner. Akt may represent a potential target for inhibitor design to treat metastatic head and neck cancer.Entities:
Keywords: Akt; cancer-associated fibroblasts; cell migration; head and neck cancer; metastasis; tumour microenvironment
Year: 2020 PMID: 32731484 PMCID: PMC7463947 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Figure 1Scattering of TYS cells in response to fibroblast CM (conditioned medium) with or without inhibitors. (A) TYS cells treated with MM1 conditioned medium ± inhibitors. Cancer cells scattered out from the colonies in response to MM1 conditioned medium and only the Akt inhibitor blocked the scattering of TYS cells (compact colonies, red circle). (B) TYS cells treated with COM D24 conditioned medium ± inhibitors. Cancer cells scattered out from the colonies (mesenchymal-type cells) in response to COM conditioned medium and only the Akt inhibitor blocked the scattering of TYS cells (compact colonies, red circle). Scattering of the cancer cells was observed for 48 h and images of the cells captured using an inverted microscope with a 10× objective lens and processed with CellSense 2.0 imaging software (Olympus). T = 0 represents the baseline cells before adding the test conditions and cells treated with SF-MEM (Serum-free MEM medium) were regarded as a negative control.
Figure 2Activation of Akt and MAPK in scattered TYS cells and migration of TYS into the matrix. (A) Phosphorylated Akt at Threonine 308 (pAkt T308) and Serine 473 (pAkt S473) and phoshorylated42/44-MAPK in TYS cells after 48 h of the scatter assay. COM-CM activated Akt in scattered TYS cells (red font) more than the negative control and MM1-CM. Fibroblast CM did not activate MAPK in TYS cells after 48 h. Blots were normalised against total protein, quantified, and the data expressed as the fold change compared to the negative control. SF-MEM-treated TYS cells in the scatter assay after 48 h were regarded as the negative control. (B) Graphical representation of the collagen gel migration assay in which TYS cells were plated on top of collagen gels followed by treatment with CM ± inhibitors. Cells that had migrated (red circle) into the collagen were counted manually by selecting 5 random areas within the gel after 48 h. (C) Bar graph representing the number of TYS cells that migrated into the matrix in response to fibroblast CM with or without inhibitors. COM-CM stimulated TYS cell migration into the matrix more than the negative control (SF-MEM-treated cells) and that of MM1-CM. The Akt and EGFR inhibitors were the most effective inhibitors in blocking CM-induced TYS cell migration.
Figure 3TYS cells invasion from their spheroids in response to fibroblast CM ± the inhibitors. (A) TYS spheroids were embedded into a collagen matrix followed by treatment with fibroblast CM with or without the inhibitors. Images of the invasive TYS cells from the spheroids were captured after day 6 using an inverted microscope with a 4X objective lens. Images of the TYS spheroids treated with TGFβRI inhibitor and CXCR4 inhibitor are presented in the Supplementary Material (Figure S4). SF-MEM-treated TYS spheroids were regarded as a negative control. Scale bar =100 µm. (B) Graphical representation of TYS invasion into the collagen matrix from the spheroids in response to fibroblast CM ± the inhibitors after day 6. COM-CM stimulated TYS invasion from the spheroids into the matrix, more than the negative control (SF-MEM-treated cells) and MM1-CM. The Akt and EGFR inhibitors were the most effective inhibitors in blocking CM-induced TYS invasion. The area of invasion (out from the edge of the spheroid) was calculated using ImageJ software.
Figure 4TYS cells’ invasion from the spheroids in response to fibroblasts ± inhibitors. (A) A 3-D TME model that illustrates the development of 3-D TYS spheroids by the hanging drop method, adding fibroblasts and embedding the spheroids into collagen. (B) TYS invasion from the spheroids in response to fibroblasts with or without exogenous inhibitors. Images of the invasive TYS cells from the spheroids were captured after day 6 using an inverted microscope with a 4X objective lens. Images of the TYS spheroids treated with TGFβRI and CXCR4 inhibitors are presented in the Supplementary Material (Figure S5). SF-MEM-treated TYS spheroids without the fibroblasts were regarded as the negative control (the same as Figure 3A). TYS cells invaded into the matrix from the spheroids in response to COMD24 cells. Scale bare = 100 µm (C) Graphical representation of TYS cell invasion into the matrix from the spheroids in response to fibroblasts ± inhibitors after day 6. COM D24 cells stimulated TYS cells’ invasion from their spheroids more than the negative control (without fibroblasts) and that of MM1 cells. The Akt and EGFR inhibitors were the most effective inhibitors in blocking COM D24 cell-induced TYS cell invasion. However, TGFβRI and CXCR4 inhibitors did not block TYS invasion. The area of invasion (out from the edge of the spheroid) was calculated using ImageJ software.
Figure 5Scattering and invasion of Akt-silenced TYS cells. (A) Akt expression and activation after silencing the Akt gene using differentmultiplicity of infection (MOI) of shRNA lentivirus. MOI 2 (red box) was chosen for transfection. Akt-silenced TYS cells were called shRNA Akt TYS. (B) Scattering of shRNA Akt TYS cells in response to fibroblast conditioned medium. shRNA Akt TYS cells were not stimulated to scatter in response to fibroblast CM and did not survive when treated with EGFR inhibitor after 48 h. Scale bar = 50 µm (C) Invasion of shRNA Akt TYS cells from the spheroids into the collagen matrix in response to fibroblast CM. Images were captured using an inverted microscope (Olympus) and processed with CellSense 2.0 imaging software (Olympus). Scale bar = 100 µm (D) Graphical presentation of Akt-silenced Akt TYS invasion and shRNA Akt TYS cells were not stimulated to invade in response to fibroblast CM.
Details of the antibodies and inhibitors used in this study.
| Name | Catalogue/Ref No. | Company and Address | Dilution/ Conc. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary antibodies | |||
| Phospho-Akt (Thr308) (C31E5E) Rabbit mAb | 2965 | Cell Signaling Tech., Denver, MI, USA | 1:1000 |
| Phospho-Akt (Ser473) (D9E) XP Rabbit mAb | 4060 | Cell Signaling Tech., Denver, MI, USA | 1:2000 |
| Akt (pan) (C67E7) Rabbit mAb | 4691 | Cell Signaling Tech., Denver, MI, USA | 1:1000 |
| Phospho- MAPK 42/44 Rabbit mAb | 9101 | Cell Signaling Tech., Denver, MI, USA | 1:2000 |
| Secondary antibodies | |||
| Goat anti-rabbit IgG, HRP-linked | 7074 | Cell Signaling Tech., Denver, MI, USA | 1:2000 |
| Chemical inhibitors | |||
| MK2206 (Akt inhibitor) | S1078 | Selleckchem, Houston, TX, USA | 5 µM |
| Gefitinib (EGFR inhibitor) | 4765S | Cell Signaling Tech., Denver, MI, USA | 10 µM |
| PD98059 (MAPK inhibitor) | 9900L | Cell Signaling Tech., Denver, MI, USA | 50 µM |
| TGFβRI kinase inhibitor VII | 616458 | Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA | 5 µM |
| AMD3100 Octahydrochloride hydrate (CXCR4 Inhibitor) | A5602 | Cell Signaling Tech., Denver, MI, USA | 1 µM |