Summer Newell1, Bridget O'Brien2,3, Rebecca Brienza4,5, Maya Dulay2,3, Anna Strewler2,6,7, Jennifer K Manuel2,8, Anaïs Tuepker9,10. 1. Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Healthcare System , Portland, OR, USA. summer.newell@va.gov. 2. VA San Francisco Healthcare System , San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine , San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. VA Connecticut Healthcare System , West Haven, CT, USA. 5. Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, USA. 6. University of California, San Francisco School of Nursing , San Francisco, CA, USA. 7. Department of Community Health Systems, University of California, San Francisco , San Francisco, CA, USA. 8. Department of Psychiatry, University of California , San Francisco, CA, USA. 9. Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Healthcare System , Portland, OR, USA. 10. Division of General Internal Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, OR, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence is growing that interprofessional team-based models benefit providers, trainees, and patients, but less is understood about the experiences of staff who work beside trainees learning these models. OBJECTIVE: To understand the experiences of staff in five VA training clinics participating in an interprofessional team-based learning initiative. DESIGN: Individual semi-structured interviews with staff were conducted during site visits, qualitatively coded, and analyzed for themes across sites and participant groups. PARTICIPANTS: Patient-centered medical home (PCMH) staff members (n = 32; RNs, Clinical and Clerical Associates) in non-primary care provider (PCP) roles working on teams with trainees from medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and psychology. APPROACH: Benefits and challenges of working in an interprofessional, academic clinic were coded by the primary author using a hybrid inductive/directed thematic analytic approach, with review and iterative theme development by the interprofessional author team. KEY RESULTS: Efforts to improve interprofessional collaboration among trainees and providers, such as increased shared leadership, have positive spillover effects for PCMH staff members. These staff members perceive themselves playing an educational role for trainees that is not always acknowledged. Playing this role, learning from the "fresh" knowledge imparted by trainees, and contributing to the future of health care all bring satisfaction to staff members. Some constraints exist for full participation in the educational efforts of the clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Increased recognition of and expanded support for PCMH staff members to participate in educational endeavors is essential as interprofessional training clinics grow.
BACKGROUND: Evidence is growing that interprofessional team-based models benefit providers, trainees, and patients, but less is understood about the experiences of staff who work beside trainees learning these models. OBJECTIVE: To understand the experiences of staff in five VA training clinics participating in an interprofessional team-based learning initiative. DESIGN: Individual semi-structured interviews with staff were conducted during site visits, qualitatively coded, and analyzed for themes across sites and participant groups. PARTICIPANTS: Patient-centered medical home (PCMH) staff members (n = 32; RNs, Clinical and Clerical Associates) in non-primary care provider (PCP) roles working on teams with trainees from medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and psychology. APPROACH: Benefits and challenges of working in an interprofessional, academic clinic were coded by the primary author using a hybrid inductive/directed thematic analytic approach, with review and iterative theme development by the interprofessional author team. KEY RESULTS: Efforts to improve interprofessional collaboration among trainees and providers, such as increased shared leadership, have positive spillover effects for PCMH staff members. These staff members perceive themselves playing an educational role for trainees that is not always acknowledged. Playing this role, learning from the "fresh" knowledge imparted by trainees, and contributing to the future of health care all bring satisfaction to staff members. Some constraints exist for full participation in the educational efforts of the clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Increased recognition of and expanded support for PCMH staff members to participate in educational endeavors is essential as interprofessional training clinics grow.
Entities:
Keywords:
academic clinic; health care workforce; interprofessional education; interprofessional practice; patient-centered medical home; qualitative methods
Authors: Stanley M Kozakowski; M Patrice Eiff; Larry A Green; Perry A Pugno; Elaine Waller; Samuel M Jones; Gerald Fetter; Patricia A Carney Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2015-06
Authors: Nancy D Harada; Laural Traylor; Kathryn Wirtz Rugen; Judith L Bowen; C Scott Smith; Bradford Felker; Deborah Ludke; Ivy Tonnu-Mihara; Joshua L Ruberg; Jayson Adler; Kimberly Uhl; Annette L Gardner; Stuart C Gilman Journal: J Interprof Care Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 2.338
Authors: Michael A Clay; Andrea L Sikon; Monica L Lypson; Arthur Gomez; Laurie Kennedy-Malone; Jada Bussey-Jones; Judith L Bowen Journal: Acad Med Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Thad Wilkins; Wonsuk Yoo; Ralph A Gillies; Julie Dahl-Smith; Jacqueline Dubose; Joseph Hobbs; Selina Smith; Dean A Seehusen Journal: PRiMER Date: 2018-05
Authors: Lori Heginbotham; Gina Baugh; Timothy Lefeber; Linda Friehling; Christy Barnhart; Lee Ann Miller; Lucas Moore; Lesley Cottrell Journal: Med Educ Online Date: 2022-12
Authors: Edward J Alessi; Barbara Caldwell; Anthony S Zazzarino; Brett Greenfield; Patricia A Findley Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 2.655