Literature DB >> 32728808

Deciphering the complexity of simple chromosomal insertions by genome sequencing.

Zirui Dong1,2,3, Matthew Hoi Kin Chau1,2,3, Yanyan Zhang1,2,3, Peng Dai4, Xiaofan Zhu1,2,3, Tak Yeung Leung1,2,5, Xiangdong Kong4, Yvonne K Kwok1, Paweł Stankiewicz6, Sau Wai Cheung7,8, Kwong Wai Choy9,10,11,12.   

Abstract

Chromosomal insertions are thought to be rare structural rearrangements. The current understanding of the underlying mechanisms of their origin is still limited. In this study, we sequenced 16 cases with apparent simple insertions previously identified by karyotyping and/or chromosomal microarray analysis. Using mate-pair genome sequencing (GS), we identified all 16 insertions and revised previously designated karyotypes in 75.0% (12/16) of the cases. Additional cryptic rearrangements were identified in 68.8% of the cases (11/16). The incidence of additional cryptic rearrangements in chromosomal insertions was significantly higher compared to balanced translocations and inversions reported in other studies by GS. We characterized and classified the cryptic insertion rearrangements into four groups, which were not mutually exclusive: (1) insertion segments were fragmented and their subsegments rearranged and clustered at the insertion site (10/16, 62.5%); (2) one or more cryptic subsegments were not inserted into the insertion site (5/16, 31.3%); (3) segments of the acceptor chromosome were scattered and rejoined with the insertion segments (2/16, 12.5%); and (4) copy number gains were identified in the flanking regions of the insertion site (2/16, 12.5%). In addition to the observation of these chromothripsis- or chromoanasynthesis-like events, breakpoint sequence analysis revealed microhomology to be the predominant feature. However, no significant correlation was found between the number of cryptic rearrangements and the size of the insertion. Overall, our study provide molecular characterization of karyotypically apparent simple insertions, demonstrate previously underappreciated complexities, and evidence that chromosomal insertions are likely formed by nonhomologous end joining and/or microhomology-mediated replication-based DNA repair.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32728808     DOI: 10.1007/s00439-020-02210-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  4 in total

1.  SHROOM4 Variants Are Associated With X-Linked Epilepsy With Features of Generalized Seizures or Generalized Discharges.

Authors:  Wen-Jun Bian; Zong-Jun Li; Jie Wang; Sheng Luo; Bing-Mei Li; Liang-Di Gao; Na He; Yong-Hong Yi
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 6.261

2.  Investigation of the genetic etiology in male infertility with apparently balanced chromosomal structural rearrangements by genome sequencing.

Authors:  Matthew Hoi Kin Chau; Ying Li; Peng Dai; Mengmeng Shi; Xiaofan Zhu; Jacqueline Pui Wah Chung; Yvonne K Kwok; Kwong Wai Choy; Xiangdong Kong; Zirui Dong
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.054

3.  Long-read Oxford nanopore sequencing reveals a de novo case of complex chromosomal rearrangement involving chromosomes 2, 7, and 13.

Authors:  Lingling Xing; Ying Shen; Xiang Wei; Yuan Luo; Yan Yang; Haipeng Liu; Hongqian Liu
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 2.473

4.  Low-pass genome sequencing-based detection of absence of heterozygosity: validation in clinical cytogenetics.

Authors:  Zirui Dong; Matthew Hoi Kin Chau; Yanyan Zhang; Zhenjun Yang; Mengmeng Shi; Yi Man Wah; Yvonne K Kwok; Tak Yeung Leung; Cynthia C Morton; Kwong Wai Choy
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 8.822

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.