| Literature DB >> 32728404 |
Alexandru Herdea1,2, Adham Charkaoui3,4, Alexandru Ulici1,2.
Abstract
Several etiologies have been proposed as a basis and evolution theory for the development of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, but limited data were published until now that link vitamin D and calcium deficiency to this condition. The present study aims to evaluate the relationship between 25-OH-Vitamin D, total calcium, and the following data: Cobb angle, age, and patient sex. The seasonal variation for vitamin D will also be taken into consideration. A total of 101 patients with a mean age of 11.61 ± 2.33 years had vitamin D and calcium levels tested. The mean Cobb angle was 26.21o ± 12.37. The level of vitamin D was, on average, 24 ng/mL ± 9.64. Calcium values were within the normal range, with an average of 9.82 mg/dL ± 0.42. The male group showed lower levels of vitamin D compared to the female group (19.6 vs. 25.45 ng/mL) (p = 0.02). Seasonal variations showed significant differences for vitamin D (p=.0001). Vitamin D level was positively correlated with the calcium level (p=0.01, r=0.973), but also with the patient's age (p <0.001, r=0.158). The Cobb angle was negatively correlated with serum vitamin D levels (p<0.01, r=-0.472). Patients included in this study had low vitamin D levels, significant differences being observed between boys and girls, boys being more affected. The positive correlation between vitamin D and calcium, together with the negative correlation with the Cobb angle, is yet another proof that patients with idiopathic scoliosis should be investigated regularly for these pathologies. ©Carol Davila University Press.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; calcium; vitamin D
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32728404 PMCID: PMC7378343 DOI: 10.25122/jml-2020-0101
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Life ISSN: 1844-122X
Distribution of patients by age, level of vitamin D, calcium, and Cobb angle in the patient group.
| 101 | 101 | 101 | 101 | |
| 11.61 | 24 | 9.82 | 26.21 | |
| 2.33 | 9.64 | 0.42 | 12.37 | |
| 12 | 22 | 9.8 | 28 | |
| 8 | 9.3 | 9 | 11 | |
| 16 | 42 | 10.5 | 60 | |
| [11.15. 12.06] | [22.12. 25.88] | [9.73. 9.90] | [23.79. 28.62] |
Overall visualization of the vitamin D level in the group of patients.
| >30 | 28 (27.72%) | |
| 20-29 | 32 (31.68%) | |
| <20 | 41 (40.59%) |
Comparison between the Vitamin D level and the patient’s gender.
| 76 | 25 | |
| 25.45 | 19.6 | |
| 10.26 | 5.43 | |
| 22 | 19 | |
| 9.3 | 13 | |
| 42 | 30 | |
| 0.02 | ||
| [23.14. 27.75] | [17.47. 21.72] | |
Note: *Chi-Square test.
Comparison between Vitamin D levels and the season in which the patient was analyzed.
| 5 | 15 | 52 | 29 | |
| 28 | 16.6 | 24.78 | 25.5 | |
| 5.12 | 5.23 | 8.72 | 9.19 | |
| .000134 | ||||
Note: *One-way ANOVA.
Association between Vitamin D level, calcium level, patient age and Cobb angle.
| 0.0973 | 0.158 | -0.472 | |
| 0.001 | < .001 | < .001 |
Note: *Pearson’s correlation test.
Comparison between the Cobb angle and the Vitamin D level for a Cobb angle lower and higher than 30°.
| 64 | 37 | |
| 26.65 | 19.41 | |
| 8.81 | 9.29 | |
| 0.06 | ||
| [24.49. 28.80] | [16.41. 22.40] | |
Note: *T-Test.