Literature DB >> 32728223

Prognostic impact of tumor budding in endometrial carcinoma within distinct molecular subgroups.

Sara Imboden1, Inti Zlobec2, Tilman T Rau3, Eva Bettschen2, Carol Büchi2, Lucine Christe2, Amanda Rohner2, Michael D Müller1, Joseph W Carlson4,5.   

Abstract

Tumor budding is a robust prognostic parameter in several tumor entities but is rarely investigated in endometrial carcinoma. We applied the recently standardized counting method from the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference for colorectal cancer (ITBCC) on a cohort of 255 endometrial carcinomas with known molecular profiles according to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) subgroups. Our investigation aims to clarify the potential prognostic role of tumor budding in endometrial carcinoma in contrast to other known prognostic factors, including molecular factors. In addition, the microcystic elongated and fragmented (MELF) pattern and tumor budding were compared with respect to their potential as markers for epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Tumor budding was found in n = 67 (26.3%) tumors, with a very low mean of 0.7 buds per ×20 HE field. Tumor budding was significantly associated with depth of invasion, nodal status, lymphatic invasion (each p < 0.001), grading (p = 0.004), and vascular invasion (p = 0.01). Tumor budding showed moderate inter-observer-variability with prognostic stratification irrespective of the observer (κ-value = 0.448). In multivariate analysis, tumor budding served as a significant independent prognosticator for worse outcomes in overall and recurrence-free survival (HR 2.376 and 2.736, p < 0.001), but not when the TCGA subgroups entered into the analysis. In consequence, dependency had to be clarified in the subgroup analysis for Polymerase E mutated (POLEmut), mismatch repair deficient (MMRdef), nonspecific mutation profile (NSMP), and P53 aberrant (P53abn) endometrial carcinomas. A particular impact was identified in the intermediate prognostic groups of NSMP and MMRdef carcinomas. Tumor budding outperformed the MELF pattern in single and combined prognostic information. In conclusion, the presence of tumor budding alone is a promising, robust, and easy-to-apply prognostic parameter in endometrial carcinoma. In a morpho-molecular approach, it exerts its prognostic potential in the most clinically relevant subgroups of endometrial carcinoma and serves as a good biomarker for EMT.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32728223     DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-0626-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  44 in total

Review 1.  Tumor budding in colorectal cancer--ready for diagnostic practice?

Authors:  Viktor H Koelzer; Inti Zlobec; Alessandro Lugli
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Impact of peritumoral and intratumoral budding in esophageal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Svenja Thies; Lars Guldener; Julia Slotta-Huspenina; Inti Zlobec; Viktor H Koelzer; Alessandro Lugli; Dino Kröll; Christian A Seiler; Marcus Feith; Rupert Langer
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.466

3.  Tumour budding in pancreatic cancer revisited: validation of the ITBCC scoring system.

Authors:  Eva Karamitopoulou; Martin Wartenberg; Inti Zlobec; Silvia Cibin; Mathias Worni; Beat Gloor; Alessandro Lugli
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  Two pathogenetic types of endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  J V Bokhman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Validation of the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016 recommendation in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung-a single-center analysis of 354 cases.

Authors:  Christina Neppl; Inti Zlobec; Ralph A Schmid; Sabina Berezowska
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  An update of the classical Bokhman's dualistic model of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Miłosz Wilczyński; Justyna Danielska; Jacek Wilczyński
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2016-07-22

Review 7.  Endometrial Carcinoma Diagnosis: Use of FIGO Grading and Genomic Subcategories in Clinical Practice: Recommendations of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

Authors:  Robert A Soslow; Carmen Tornos; Kay J Park; Anais Malpica; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Esther Oliva; Vinita Parkash; Joseph Carlson; W Glenn McCluggage; C Blake Gilks
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.762

8.  Phenotype of POLE-mutated endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Sara Imboden; Denis Nastic; Mehran Ghaderi; Filippa Rydberg; Tilman T Rau; Michael D Mueller; Elisabeth Epstein; Joseph W Carlson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Alicia León-Castillo; Heidi Britton; Melissa K McConechy; Jessica N McAlpine; Remi Nout; Stefan Kommoss; Sara Y Brucker; Joseph W Carlson; Elisabeth Epstein; Tilman T Rau; Tjalling Bosse; David N Church; C Blake Gilks
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 7.996

10.  Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of 'multiple-classifier' endometrial carcinomas.

Authors:  Alicia León-Castillo; Ester Gilvazquez; Remi Nout; Vincent Thbm Smit; Jessica N McAlpine; Melissa McConechy; Stefan Kommoss; Sara Y Brucker; Joseph W Carlson; Elisabeth Epstein; Tilman T Rau; Robert A Soslow; Raji Ganesan; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Esther Oliva; Beth T Harrison; David N Church; C Blake Gilks; Tjalling Bosse
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2020-01-12       Impact factor: 7.996

View more
  8 in total

1.  A Novel Prognostic Stratified System Based on Tumor Budding and the Cell Nest Size in Ureter Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jialin Li; Xinyue Li; Jing Yang
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  L1CAM Expression in Microcystic, Elongated, and Fragmented (MELF) Glands Predicts Lymph Node Involvement in Endometrial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Damiano Arciuolo; Antonio Travaglino; Angela Santoro; Giulia Scaglione; Nicoletta D'Alessandris; Michele Valente; Frediano Inzani; Rossella Accarino; Alessia Piermattei; Roberta Benvenuto; Antonio Raffone; Camilla Nero; Silvia Pelligra; Francesco Fanfani; Massimo Mascolo; Gian Franco Zannoni
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Prognostic significance of CTNNB1 mutation in early stage endometrial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Renato Seracchioli; Antonio Mollo; Antonio Travaglino; Antonio Raffone; Diego Raimondo; Sabrina Reppuccia; Alessandro Ruggiero; Alessandro Arena; Paolo Casadio; Fulvio Zullo; Luigi Insabato
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 4.  Uterine carcinosarcoma vs endometrial serous and clear cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of survival.

Authors:  Antonio Raffone; Antonio Travaglino; Diego Raimondo; Manuela Maletta; Valentino De Vivo; Umberto Visiello; Paolo Casadio; Renato Seracchioli; Fulvio Zullo; Luigi Insabato; Antonio Mollo
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 4.447

Review 5.  New Pathological and Clinical Insights in Endometrial Cancer in View of the Updated ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines.

Authors:  Angela Santoro; Giuseppe Angelico; Antonio Travaglino; Frediano Inzani; Damiano Arciuolo; Michele Valente; Nicoletta D'Alessandris; Giulia Scaglione; Vincenzo Fiorentino; Antonio Raffone; Gian Franco Zannoni
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  [Tumor budding in colorectal cancer-Information for clinical use and instructions for practical evaluation].

Authors:  Felix Müller; Alessandro Lugli; Heather Dawson
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 1.011

7.  Classification Systems of Endometrial Cancer: A Comparative Study about Old and New.

Authors:  Camelia Alexandra Coada; Giulia Dondi; Gloria Ravegnini; Antonio De Leo; Donatella Santini; Eugenia De Crescenzo; Marco Tesei; Alessandro Bovicelli; Susanna Giunchi; Ada Dormi; Marco Di Stanislao; Alessio G Morganti; Dario De Biase; Pierandrea De Iaco; Anna Myriam Perrone
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-24

Review 8.  Tumor Budding in Gynecologic Cancer as a Marker for Poor Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Perspectives of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition.

Authors:  Muhammad Joan Ailia; Nishant Thakur; Yosep Chong; Kwangil Yim
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 6.639

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.