Literature DB >> 26980046

Impact of peritumoral and intratumoral budding in esophageal adenocarcinomas.

Svenja Thies1, Lars Guldener1, Julia Slotta-Huspenina2, Inti Zlobec1, Viktor H Koelzer1, Alessandro Lugli1, Dino Kröll3, Christian A Seiler3, Marcus Feith4, Rupert Langer5.   

Abstract

Tumor budding has prognostic significance in many carcinomas and is defined as the presence of detached isolated single cells or small cell clusters up to 5 cells at the invasion front (peritumoral budding [PTB]) or within the tumor (intratumoral budding [ITB]). For esophageal adenocarcinomas (EACs), there are currently only few data about the impact of this morphological feature. We investigated tumor budding in a large collective of 200 primarily resected EACs. Pancytokeratin staining was demonstrated to be superior to hematoxylin and eosin staining for the detection of buds with substantial to excellent interobserver agreement and used for subsequent analysis. PTB and ITB were scored across 10 high-power fields (HPFs). The median count of tumor buds was 130/10 HPFs for PTB (range, 2-593) and 80/10 HPFs for ITB (range, 1-656). PTB and ITB correlated significantly with each other (r = 0.9; P < .001). High PTB and ITB rates were seen in more advanced tumor categories (P < .001 each); tumors with lymph node metastases (P < .001/P = .002); and lymphatic, vascular, and perineural invasion and higher tumor grading (P < .001 each). Survival analysis showed an association with worse survival for high-grade ITB (P = .029) but not PTB (P = .385). However, in multivariate analysis, lymph node and resection status, but not ITB, were independent prognostic parameters. In conclusion, PTB and ITB can be observed in EAC to various degrees. High-grade budding is associated with aggressive tumor phenotype. Assessment of tumor budding, especially ITB, may provide additional prognostic information about tumor behavior and may be useful in specific cases for risk stratification of EAC patients.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenocarcinoma; Cytokeratin; Esophagus; Impact; Tumor budding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26980046     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2016.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  10 in total

Review 1.  Tumour budding in solid cancers.

Authors:  Alessandro Lugli; Inti Zlobec; Martin D Berger; Richard Kirsch; Iris D Nagtegaal
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Prognostic impact of tumor budding in endometrial carcinoma within distinct molecular subgroups.

Authors:  Sara Imboden; Inti Zlobec; Tilman T Rau; Eva Bettschen; Carol Büchi; Lucine Christe; Amanda Rohner; Michael D Müller; Joseph W Carlson
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Surgical pathology of adenocarcinomas arising around or within the gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Bastian Dislich; Dino Kröll; Rupert Langer
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-08-24

4.  Perineural Invasion Is a Significant Indicator of High Malignant Degree and Poor Prognosis in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Liuyang Bai; Liangying Yan; Yaping Guo; Luyun He; Zhiyan Sun; Wenbo Cao; Jing Lu; Saijun Mo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 5.  Tumor Budding: The Name is EMT. Partial EMT.

Authors:  Alexandru Dan Grigore; Mohit Kumar Jolly; Dongya Jia; Mary C Farach-Carson; Herbert Levine
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Cytokeratin-based assessment of tumour budding in colorectal cancer: analysis in stage II patients and prospective diagnostic experience.

Authors:  Viktor H Koelzer; Naziheh Assarzadegan; Heather Dawson; Bojana Mitrovic; Andrea Grin; David E Messenger; Richard Kirsch; Robert H Riddell; Alessandro Lugli; Inti Zlobec
Journal:  J Pathol Clin Res       Date:  2017-07-26

Review 7.  Tumour budding and its clinical implications in gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  Inti Zlobec; Martin D Berger; Alessandro Lugli
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Automated tumour budding quantification by machine learning augments TNM staging in muscle-invasive bladder cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Nicolas Brieu; Christos G Gavriel; Ines P Nearchou; David J Harrison; Günter Schmidt; Peter D Caie
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Clinicopathologic correlations of superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma in endoscopic submucosal dissection specimens.

Authors:  Sadhna Dhingra; Firas Bahdi; Sarah B May; Mohamed O Othman
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 2.644

10.  Post-neoadjuvant assessment of tumour budding according to ITBCC subgroups delivers stage- and regression-grade independent prognostic information in intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Moritz Jesinghaus; Anna-Lina Herz; Meike Kohlruss; Miguel Silva; Albert Grass; Sebastian Lange; Alexander Novotny; Katja Ott; Thomas Schmidt; Matthias Gaida; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Carsten Denkert; Wilko Weichert; Gisela Keller
Journal:  J Pathol Clin Res       Date:  2022-06-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.