| Literature DB >> 32727391 |
Sara Lima1, Lurdes Teixeira2, Raquel Esteves2, Fátima Ribeiro2, Fernanda Pereira2, Ana Teixeira2,3, Clarisse Magalhães2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Study older adults' quality of life is becoming increasingly important in the assessment, quality improvement and allocation of health and social care service. The purpose of this study was to enhance knowledge on the relationship between modifiable (psychological variables) and non-modifiable variables (sociodemographic), and quality of life in elderly, regarding psychological and social variables in Portuguese context.Entities:
Keywords: Functionality; Quality of life; Social support; Spirituality
Year: 2020 PMID: 32727391 PMCID: PMC7391807 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01646-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Geriatr ISSN: 1471-2318 Impact factor: 3.921
Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the sample
| Categorical variables | %(n) |
|---|---|
| 63.6(384) | |
| Single | 6.6(40) |
| Married | 67.2(406) |
| Divorced | 1.2(7) |
| Widow | 25.0(151) |
| Illiterate | 4.6(28) |
| 1 a 4 years | 92.7(560) |
| 5 a 12 years | 2.5(14) |
| > 12 years | 0.3(2) |
| Partner | 57.0(343) |
| Nuclear Family | 22.3(134) |
| Extended family | 3.2(19) |
| Institution / Senior Residence | 0.8(5) |
| Alone | 9.1(55) |
| Alone with assistance neighbour | 1.5(9) |
| Alone with support of institution | 3.2(19) |
| Alone without help | 3.0(18) |
| Presence of chronic disease (yes) | 72.0(435) |
| Prescription of chronic medication (yes) | 87.1(526) |
| 71.60(4.81) | |
| 65–94 | |
Descriptive statistics and correlation coefficients (Pearson and Point Bisserial) for study variables
| Variables | Mean (SD) | Range | 2. | 3. | 4. | 5. | 6. | 7. | 8. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.Age | 71.60(4.81) | 62–94 | .039 | −.014 | −.014 | ||||
| 2.Gender | – | – | .005 | .163** | .011 | ||||
| 3.Presence of chronic disease | – | – | .042 | −.042 | −.057 | ||||
| 4.Spirituality | 47.76(11.34) | 15–60 | .019 | .030 | −.058 | −.072 | |||
| 5. Functionality | 96.12(13.12) | 00–100 | |||||||
| 6.Social support | 64.02(9.51) | 15–75 | |||||||
| 7.Mental Quality of Life | 52.94(11.03) | 14–70 | |||||||
| 8.Physical Quality of Life | 63.45(15.15) | 21–87 |
SD: standard deviation; **p < .01.
Fig. 1Path analysis with standardized direct effects. CI 95% = bias-corrected bootstrap confidence interval at 95% (1000 samples)
Standardized indirect effects for the mediation
| Variables | Indirect | CI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictor | Mediator | Outcome | Lower | Upper | |
| Functionality | Social support | Mental quality of life | .059 | .096 | .258 |
| Age | Functionality | Physical quality of life | −.047 | −.018 | −.078 |
** p < .01; CI95% = Bootstrap bias-corrected confidence interval at 95% (1000 samples)