BACKGROUND: Studies concerning the effect of different types of leisure activities on various cognitive domains are limited. This study tests the hypothesis that mental, physical, and social activities have a domain-specific protection against cognitive decline. METHODS: A cohort of a geographically defined population in China was examined in 2003-2005 and followed for an average of 2.4 years. Leisure activities were assessed in 1,463 adults aged 65 years and older without cognitive or physical impairment at baseline, and their cognitive performances were tested at baseline and follow-up examinations. RESULTS: High level of mental activity was related to less decline in global cognition (β = -.23, p < .01), language (β = -.11, p < .05), and executive function (β = -.13, p < .05) in ANCOVA models adjusting for age, gender, education, history of stroke, body mass index, Apolipoprotein E genotype, and baseline cognition. High level of physical activity was related to less decline in episodic memory (β = -.08, p < .05) and language (β = -.15, p < .01). High level of social activity was associated with less decline in global cognition (β = -.11, p < .05). Further, a dose-response pattern was observed: although participants who did not engage in any of the three activities experienced a significant global cognitive decline, those who engaged in any one of the activities maintained their cognition, and those who engaged in two or three activities improved their cognition. The same pattern was observed in men and in women. CONCLUSIONS: Leisure activities in old age may protect against cognitive decline for both women and men, and different types of activities seem to benefit different cognitive domains.
BACKGROUND: Studies concerning the effect of different types of leisure activities on various cognitive domains are limited. This study tests the hypothesis that mental, physical, and social activities have a domain-specific protection against cognitive decline. METHODS: A cohort of a geographically defined population in China was examined in 2003-2005 and followed for an average of 2.4 years. Leisure activities were assessed in 1,463 adults aged 65 years and older without cognitive or physical impairment at baseline, and their cognitive performances were tested at baseline and follow-up examinations. RESULTS: High level of mental activity was related to less decline in global cognition (β = -.23, p < .01), language (β = -.11, p < .05), and executive function (β = -.13, p < .05) in ANCOVA models adjusting for age, gender, education, history of stroke, body mass index, Apolipoprotein E genotype, and baseline cognition. High level of physical activity was related to less decline in episodic memory (β = -.08, p < .05) and language (β = -.15, p < .01). High level of social activity was associated with less decline in global cognition (β = -.11, p < .05). Further, a dose-response pattern was observed: although participants who did not engage in any of the three activities experienced a significant global cognitive decline, those who engaged in any one of the activities maintained their cognition, and those who engaged in two or three activities improved their cognition. The same pattern was observed in men and in women. CONCLUSIONS: Leisure activities in old age may protect against cognitive decline for both women and men, and different types of activities seem to benefit different cognitive domains.
Authors: C L Emsley; S Gao; Y Li; C Liang; R Ji; K S Hall; J Cao; F Ma; Y Wu; P Ying; Y Zhang; S Sun; F W Unverzagt; C W Slemenda; H C Hendrie Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2000-05-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Maaike Angevaren; Luc Vanhees; Astrid C J Nooyens; C G Wanda Wendel-Vos; W M Monique Verschuren Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Milan Chang; Palmi V Jonsson; Jon Snaedal; Sigurbjorn Bjornsson; Jane S Saczynski; Thor Aspelund; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Maria K Jonsdottir; Oscar L Lopez; Tamara B Harris; Vilmundur Gudnason; Lenore J Launer Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2010-08-30 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Jane S Saczynski; Maria K Jonsdottir; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Palmi V Jonsson; Melisa E Garcia; Olafur Kjartansson; Mark A van Buchem; Vlimundur Gudnason; Lenore J Launer Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: A Foubert-Samier; M Le Goff; C Helmer; K Pérès; J-M Orgogozo; P Barberger-Gateau; H Amieva; J-F Dartigues Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Hanna Karen Moreira Antunes; Ruth Ferreira Santos-Galduroz; Valdir De Aquino Lemos; Orlando Francisco Amodeu Bueno; Patrícia Rzezak; Marcos Gonçalves de Santana; Marco Túlio De Mello Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2015-07-14
Authors: Chao-Yi Wu; Juleen Rodakowski; Lauren Terhorst; Mary Amanda Dew; Meryl Butters; Jordan F Karp; Steven M Albert; Ariel G Gildengers; Charles F Reynolds; Elizabeth R Skidmore Journal: J Appl Gerontol Date: 2021-01-06
Authors: Lyndsey M Miller; Nathan F Dieckmann; Nora C Mattek; Karen S Lyons; Jeffrey A Kaye Journal: Res Gerontol Nurs Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 1.571
Authors: Sophie Laforest; Agathe Lorthios-Guilledroit; Kareen Nour; Manon Parisien; Michel Fournier; Dave Ellemberg; Danielle Guay; Charles-Émile Desgagnés-Cyr; Nathalie Bier Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2017-04-01
Authors: Susanne Inez Steinberg; Mary Dupuis Sammel; Brian Tal Harel; Adrian Schembri; Christopher Policastro; Hillary R Bogner; Selamawit Negash; Steven Edward Arnold Journal: Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 2.035