Literature DB >> 32726365

Incubating parents serve as visual cues to predators in Kentish plover (Charadrius alexandrinus).

Noémie Engel1,2, Zsolt Végvári3,4, Romy Rice1, Vojtěch Kubelka1,2,5,6, Tamás Székely1,2,7.   

Abstract

Ground-nesting birds face many challenges to reproduce successfully, with nest predation being the main cause of reproductive failure. Visual predators such as corvids and egg-eating raptors, are among the most common causes of nest failure; thus, parental strategies that reduce the risk of visual nest predation should be favored by selection. To date, most research has focused on egg crypsis without considering adult crypsis, although in natural circumstances the eggs are covered by an incubating parent most of the time. Here we use a ground-nesting shorebird, the Kentish plover (Charadrius alexandrinus) as model species to experimentally test whether decoy parents influence nest predation. Using artificial nests with a male decoy, a female decoy or no decoy, we found that the presence of a decoy increased nest predation (N = 107 nests, p < 0.001). However, no difference was found in predation rates between nests with a male versus female decoy (p > 0.05). Additionally, we found that nests in densely vegetated habitats experienced higher survival compared to nests placed in sparsely vegetated habitats. Nest camera images, predator tracks and marks left on eggs identified the brown-necked raven (Corvus ruficollis) as the main visual nest predator. Our study suggests that the presence of incubating parents may enhance nest detectability to visual predators. However, parents may reduce the predation risk by placing a nest in sites where they are covered by vegetation. Our findings highlight the importance of nest site selection not only regarding egg crypsis but also considering incubating adult camouflage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32726365      PMCID: PMC7390395          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  14 in total

1.  On the advantage of being different: Nest predation and the coexistence of bird species.

Authors:  T E Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Nest predation among vegetation layers and habitat types: revising the dogmas.

Authors:  T E Martin
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 3.  Effectiveness of predator removal for enhancing bird populations.

Authors:  Rebecca K Smith; Andrew S Pullin; Gavin B Stewart; William J Sutherland
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  The bright incubate at night: sexual dichromatism and adaptive incubation division in an open-nesting shorebird.

Authors:  Kasun B Ekanayake; Michael A Weston; Dale G Nimmo; Grainne S Maguire; John A Endler; Clemens Küpper
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Escape Distance in Ground-Nesting Birds Differs with Individual Level of Camouflage.

Authors:  Jared K Wilson-Aggarwal; Jolyon T Troscianko; Martin Stevens; Claire N Spottiswoode
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 6.  Island biogeography: Taking the long view of nature's laboratories.

Authors:  Robert J Whittaker; José María Fernández-Palacios; Thomas J Matthews; Michael K Borregaard; Kostas A Triantis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Location of volatile odor sources by ghost crabOcypode quadrata (Fabricius).

Authors:  C A Wellins; D Rittschof; M Wachowiak
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Nest site selection by Kentish plover suggests a trade-off between nest-crypsis and predator detection strategies.

Authors:  Miguel Ángel Gómez-Serrano; Pascual López-López
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Camouflage and Clutch Survival in Plovers and Terns.

Authors:  Mary Caswell Stoddard; Krisztina Kupán; Harold N Eyster; Wendoly Rojas-Abreu; Medardo Cruz-López; Martín Alejandro Serrano-Meneses; Clemens Küpper
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Camouflage predicts survival in ground-nesting birds.

Authors:  Jolyon Troscianko; Jared Wilson-Aggarwal; Martin Stevens; Claire N Spottiswoode
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.