Literature DB >> 25854884

The bright incubate at night: sexual dichromatism and adaptive incubation division in an open-nesting shorebird.

Kasun B Ekanayake1, Michael A Weston2, Dale G Nimmo2, Grainne S Maguire3, John A Endler4, Clemens Küpper5.   

Abstract

Ornamentation of parents poses a high risk for offspring because it reduces cryptic nest defence. Over a century ago, Wallace proposed that sexual dichromatism enhances crypsis of open-nesting females although subsequent studies found that dichromatism per se is not necessarily adaptive. We tested whether reduced female ornamentation in a sexually dichromatic species reduces the risk of clutch depredation and leads to adaptive parental roles in the red-capped plover Charadrius ruficapillus, a species with biparental incubation. Males had significantly brighter and redder head coloration than females. During daytime, when visually foraging predators are active, colour-matched model males incurred a higher risk of clutch depredation than females, whereas at night there was no difference in depredation risk between sexes. In turn, red-capped plovers maintained a strongly diurnal/nocturnal division of parental care during incubation, with males attending the nest largely at night when visual predators were inactive and females incubating during the day. We found support for Wallace's conclusion that reduced female ornamentation provides a selective advantage when reproductive success is threatened by visually foraging predators. We conclude that predators may alter their prey's parental care patterns and therefore may affect parental cooperation during care.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Charadrius; Wallace's hypothesis; adaptive parental care; natural selection; ornamentation; sexual dichromatism

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25854884      PMCID: PMC4426615          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.3026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  14 in total

1.  Why are female birds ornamented?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Evolution of sexual dichromatism in relation to nesting habits in European passerines: a test of Wallace's hypothesis.

Authors:  J J Soler; J Moreno
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  Female butterflies prefer males bearing bright iridescent ornamentation.

Authors:  Darrell J Kemp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Sami Merilaita
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Plasticity of parental care under the risk of predation: how much should parents reduce care?

Authors:  Cameron K Ghalambor; Susana I Peluc; Thomas E Martin
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Catch the wave: prairie dogs assess neighbours' awareness using contagious displays.

Authors:  James F Hare; Kevin L Campbell; Robert W Senkiw
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Reconstructing the evolution of sexual dichromatism: current color diversity does not reflect past rates of male and female change.

Authors:  J Jordan Price; Muir D Eaton
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Cryptic gentes revealed in pallid cuckoos Cuculus pallidus using reflectance spectrophotometry.

Authors:  M Starling; R Heinsohn; A Cockburn; N E Langmore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Sexual dichromatism in frogs: natural selection, sexual selection and unexpected diversity.

Authors:  Rayna C Bell; Kelly R Zamudio
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Melanin-based plumage coloration and flight displays in plovers and allies.

Authors:  Veronika Bókony; András Liker; Tamás Székely; János Kis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  6 in total

1.  Incubating parents serve as visual cues to predators in Kentish plover (Charadrius alexandrinus).

Authors:  Noémie Engel; Zsolt Végvári; Romy Rice; Vojtěch Kubelka; Tamás Székely
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Nest initiation and flooding in response to season and semi-lunar spring tides in a ground-nesting shorebird.

Authors:  Martin Bulla; Clemens Küpper; Silvia Plaschke; Medardo Cruz-López; Salvador Gómez Del Ángel
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Diversity of incubation rhythms in a facultatively uniparental shorebird - the Northern Lapwing.

Authors:  Martin Sládeček; Eva Vozabulová; Miroslav E Šálek; Martin Bulla
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Geographic variation in breeding system and environment predicts melanin-based plumage ornamentation of male and female Kentish plovers.

Authors:  Araceli Argüelles-Ticó; Clemens Küpper; Robert N Kelsh; András Kosztolányi; Tamás Székely; René E van Dijk
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Camouflage and Clutch Survival in Plovers and Terns.

Authors:  Mary Caswell Stoddard; Krisztina Kupán; Harold N Eyster; Wendoly Rojas-Abreu; Medardo Cruz-López; Martín Alejandro Serrano-Meneses; Clemens Küpper
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Regional drivers of clutch loss reveal important trade-offs for beach-nesting birds.

Authors:  Brooke Maslo; Thomas A Schlacher; Michael A Weston; Chantal M Huijbers; Chris Anderson; Ben L Gilby; Andrew D Olds; Rod M Connolly; David S Schoeman
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.