| Literature DB >> 32725882 |
Selami Demirci1, Alexis Leonard1, John F Tisdale1.
Abstract
The generation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) is an active and promising area of research; however, generating engraftable HSCs remains a major obstacle. Ex vivo HSC derivation from renewable sources such as iPSCs offers an experimental tool for studying developmental hematopoiesis, disease modeling, and drug discovery, and yields tremendous therapeutic potential for malignant and nonmalignant hematological disorders. Although initial attempts mostly recapitulated yolk sac primitive/definitive hematopoiesis with inability to engraft, recent advances suggest the feasibility of engraftable HSC derivation from iPSCs utilizing ectopic transcription factor expression. Strategic development for de novo HSC generation includes further investigations of HSC ontogeny, and elucidation of critical signaling pathways, epigenetic modulations, HSC and iPSC microenvironment, and cell-cell interactions that contribute to stem cell biology and function.Entities:
Keywords: embryo; hematopoiesis; hematopoietic differentiation; hemogenic endothelium; induced pluripotent stem cells; reprogramming
Year: 2020 PMID: 32725882 PMCID: PMC7695636 DOI: 10.1002/sctm.20-0247
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cells Transl Med ISSN: 2157-6564 Impact factor: 6.940
Selected reports for engraftable hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) derived from PSCs
| Cellular source | Approach | Engraftment | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Monolayer culture on OP9 cells | Myeloid biased and low lymphocyte engraftment (primary and secondary recipients, 10‐20 wk) |
|
| Human ESCs or iPSCs | Subcutaneous transplantation of PSCs with or without OP9 feeder cells and cytokines to derive HSPCs from PSCs induced teratomas | B and T cells and myeloid engraftment (primary and secondary recipients, 4‐12 wk) |
|
| Human ESCs | Monolayer culture on stromal cells derived from mouse aorta‐gonad‐mesonephros (AGM) region | Myeloid and lymphoid engraftment (primary and secondary recipients, 8‐12 wk) |
|
| Human ESCs‐ and monkey iPSCs‐derived CD34+ cells | Embryoid body formation followed by sorting of CD34+ cells cultured on | Myeloid, lymphoid, and erythroid engraftment (primary and secondary recipients, 12‐16 wk) |
|
|
| Embryoid Body formation followed by sorting of CD34+CD45+ cells to transduce with the transcription factors | Erythroid and myeloid engraftment (primary recipient, 4‐5 wk) |
|
|
| Embryoid body formation followed by sorting of hemogenic endothelium cell to transduce with the transcription factors | B and T cells and myeloid (primary and secondary recipient, 12‐16 wk) |
|
| MLL‐AF4 engineered HSPCs derived from human iPSCs | Monolayer differentiation followed by a collection of HSPCs to transduce with the transcription factor | B and T cells and myeloid (primary and secondary recipient, 8 wk) |
|
| Inducible | Embryoid body formation followed by sorting of inducible hemogenic endothelium cells to culture on OP9‐DL1 cells | T cells (primary and secondary recipients, 4‐6 wk) |
|
| Mouse PSCs | Embryoid body formation followed by hematopoietic specification in 3D hydrogel | Myeloid and B cells (primary recipient, 3 wk) |
|
|
| Subcutaneous transplantation of engineered iPSCs to derive HSPCs from iPSCs induced teratomas | B and T cells and myeloid engraftment (primary and secondary recipients, 16 wk) |
|
FIGURE 1Schematic representations of mouse embryonic hematopoietic development. AGM, aorta‐gonad‐mesonephros