Literature DB >> 32725538

Almost 10 years of PET/MR attenuation correction: the effect on lesion quantification with PSMA: clinical evaluation on 200 prostate cancer patients.

Borjana Bogdanovic1, Andrei Gafita2, Sylvia Schachoff2, Matthias Eiber2, Jorge Cabello2, Wolfgang A Weber2, Stephan G Nekolla2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: After a decade of PET/MR, the case of attenuation correction (AC) remains open. The initial four-compartment (air, water, fat, soft tissue) Dixon-based AC scheme has since been expanded with several features, the latest being MR field-of-view extension and a bone atlas. As this potentially changes quantification, we evaluated the impact of these features in PET AC in prostate cancer patients.
METHODS: Two hundred prostate cancer patients were examined with either 18F- or 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/MR. Qualitative and quantitative analysis (SUVmean, SUVmax, correlation, and statistical significance) was performed on images reconstructed using different AC schemes: Dixon, Dixon+MLAA, Dixon+HUGE, and Dixon+HUGE+bones for 18F-PSMA data; Dixon and Dixon+bones for 68Ga-PSMA data. Uptakes were compared using linear regression against standard Dixon.
RESULTS: High correlation and no visually perceivable differences between all evaluated methods (r > 0.996) were found. The mean relative difference in lesion uptake of 18F-PSMA and 68Ga-PSMA remained, respectively, within 4% and 3% in soft tissue, and within 10% and 9% in bones for all evaluated methods. Bone registration errors were detected, causing mean uptake change of 5% in affected lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results and the encountered bone atlas registration inaccuracy, we deduce that including bones and extending the MR field-of-view did not introduce clinically significant differences in PSMA diagnostic accuracy and tracer uptake quantification in prostate cancer pelvic lesions, facilitating the analysis of serial studies respectively. However, in the absence of ground truth data, we advise against atlas-based methods when comparing serial scans for bone lesions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attenuation correction; Bone atlas; PET quantification; Prostate cancer; Truncation correction; Whole-body PET/MR

Year:  2020        PMID: 32725538      PMCID: PMC7835314          DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04957-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  20 in total

1.  Automatic, three-segment, MR-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MR data.

Authors:  V Schulz; I Torres-Espallardo; S Renisch; Z Hu; N Ojha; P Börnert; M Perkuhn; T Niendorf; W M Schäfer; H Brockmann; T Krohn; A Buhl; R W Günther; F M Mottaghy; G A Krombach
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration (CAIPIRINHA) for multi-slice imaging.

Authors:  Felix A Breuer; Martin Blaimer; Robin M Heidemann; Matthias F Mueller; Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  PET imaging in prostate cancer: focus on prostate-specific membrane antigen.

Authors:  Ronnie C Mease; Catherine A Foss; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Fast imaging in liquids and solids with the Back-projection Low Angle ShoT (BLAST) technique.

Authors:  S Hafner
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  MRI-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MRI: quantitative evaluation of segmentation- and atlas-based methods.

Authors:  Matthias Hofmann; Ilja Bezrukov; Frederic Mantlik; Philip Aschoff; Florian Steinke; Thomas Beyer; Bernd J Pichler; Bernhard Schölkopf
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  The Effect of Including Bone in Dixon-Based Attenuation Correction for 18F-Fluciclovine PET/MRI of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Mattijs Elschot; Kirsten M Selnæs; Håkon Johansen; Brage Krüger-Stokke; Helena Bertilsson; Tone F Bathen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Tissue classification as a potential approach for attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MRI: evaluation with PET/CT data.

Authors:  Axel Martinez-Möller; Michael Souvatzoglou; Gaspar Delso; Ralph A Bundschuh; Christophe Chefd'hotel; Sibylle I Ziegler; Nassir Navab; Markus Schwaiger; Stephan G Nekolla
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Impact of improved attenuation correction featuring a bone atlas and truncation correction on PET quantification in whole-body PET/MR.

Authors:  Mark Oehmigen; Maike E Lindemann; Marcel Gratz; Julian Kirchner; Verena Ruhlmann; Lale Umutlu; Jan Ole Blumhagen; Matthias Fenchel; Harald H Quick
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  MR-based field-of-view extension in MR/PET: B0 homogenization using gradient enhancement (HUGE).

Authors:  Jan O Blumhagen; Ralf Ladebeck; Matthias Fenchel; Klaus Scheffler
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  A multi-centre evaluation of eleven clinically feasible brain PET/MRI attenuation correction techniques using a large cohort of patients.

Authors:  Claes N Ladefoged; Ian Law; Udunna Anazodo; Keith St Lawrence; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Ciprian Catana; Ninon Burgos; M Jorge Cardoso; Sebastien Ourselin; Brian Hutton; Inés Mérida; Nicolas Costes; Alexander Hammers; Didier Benoit; Søren Holm; Meher Juttukonda; Hongyu An; Jorge Cabello; Mathias Lukas; Stephan Nekolla; Sibylle Ziegler; Matthias Fenchel; Bjoern Jakoby; Michael E Casey; Tammie Benzinger; Liselotte Højgaard; Adam E Hansen; Flemming L Andersen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  2 in total

1.  10 years of PET/MR: Looking back for a moment.

Authors:  Stephan G Nekolla
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  The impact of MR-based attenuation correction in spinal cord FDG-PET/MR imaging for neurological studies.

Authors:  Valentina Brancato; Pasquale Borrelli; Vincenzo Alfano; Marco Picardi; Mario Mascalchi; Emanuele Nicolai; Marco Salvatore; Marco Aiello
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 4.506

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.