Dongmei Ma1, Song Li1, Xiaojuan Nie1, Lamei Chen1, Nan Chen1, Dongsheng Hou2, Xiuhong Liu3, Binbin Gao4. 1. Department of Dermatology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250021, P.R. China. 2. Department of Pathology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250021, P.R. China. 3. Department of Dermatology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Kun Ming Medical University, Yuxi, Yunnan 653100, P.R. China. 4. Department of Oncology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250021, P.R. China.
Melanoma is the most aggressive type of skin cancer, the incidence of which has increased in recent decades (1–3). Despite the improvement in diagnosis and clinical therapy (4–8), there is still a high mortality rate among melanomapatients (9–11). In addition, melanoma cells develop drug resistance to clinical treatments and survival (12–14). Hence, there is an urgent need to identify novel drugs and strategies to improve melanoma treatment (15–18).The function of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases is to catalyse the aminoacylation of tRNA through their cognate amino acids (19). There are two forms of isoleucine-tRNA synthetase: Cytoplasmic and mitochondrial. IARS2 encodes for mitochondrial form of isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase (20). Recent studies have shown that IARS2 is involved in several diseases (21,22). IARS2 expression is higher in tumour tissues than surrounding tissue and knockdown of IARS2 suppresses proliferation of the RKO cells (23). IARS2 mutation was found in a patient with neurotrophic keratitis and corneal opacification (21). Approximately 59% of the colorectal cancerspatients harbour a mutation at 5′ upstream region of the mitochondrial IARS2 (24). Thus, IARS2 may be considered as a cancer-promoting gene (23,25–27).To date, the association between IARS2 and melanoma remains unclear. In the present study, the function of IARS2 was elucidated in melanoma cell proliferation and apoptosis.
Materials and methods
Cell lines
The humanmelanoma cell lines A375, MUM-2B, and C918 were purchased from Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). A375 and C918 cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (GE Healthcare Life Sciences), while MUM-2B cell line was cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI)-1640 medium (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. Both media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin (Merck KGaA).
RT-qPCR
Total RNA was extracted from A375, MUM-2B and C918 cells using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and was quantified using NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). A total of 2 µg of RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using miRNA 1st strand cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instruction. A total of 1 µl of cDNA was assessed by SYBR Green real time-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Primers were designed and synthesised by Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd. The sequences are as follows: IARS2 forward, 5′-GGCAACCCATGACAATCCCA-3′, and reverse, 5′-TGGACCTCCTTATGCAAACGG-3′; Glyceralde-hyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) forward, 5′-TGACTTCAACAGCGACACCCA-3′ and reverse, 5′-CACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCAAA-3′. RT-qPCR was performed at 95°C for 4 min, then 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 45 sec by a LightCycler 480 (Roche Diagnostics). The results were analysed by a GeneChip Scanner 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). All reactions were performed in triplicate. GAPDH was used to normalise expression. Relative expression level of target genes was calculated using 2−ΔΔCq method (28).
Lentiviral packaging and cell infection
The shIARS2 lentivirus and vector control were constructed by GeneChem, Inc. IARS2oligonucleotides were designed to target the complementary DNA sequence (ACTTGCAGTCATCCATTAA). The hairpin sequence of shIARS2 was CCGGGTACTTGCAGTCATCCATTAATTCAAGAGATTAATGGATGACTGCAAGTACTTTTTG. The shRNA was synthesized and inserted into the GV115 vector (GeneChem, Inc.) at AgeI and EcoRI restriction sites. Lentivirus package was performed as described (29). Then shIARS2-lentivirus or negative control (shCtrl) lentivirus was transfected into A375 cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After 72 h of infection, the cells were observed under a fluorescence microscope, and subsequently harvested to determine knockdown efficiency by RT-qPCR and western blot analysis.
Western blot analysis
After 72 h of lentivirus infection, the cells were washed with cold phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails for 15 min. Cell lysate was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C and the supernatants were collected. Protein concentration was measured by bicinchoninic acid protein assay. Equal amounts of total protein samples were analysed on sodium dodecyl sulphatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (EMD Millipore). PVDF membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat dried milk for 1 h, and then incubated with the appropriate primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. HRP-coupled secondary antibody was added and protein bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (EMD Millipore). The antibodies for IARS2 (cat. no. ab66012) was purchased from Abcam. The antibodies for GAPDH (cat. no. sc-32233) and the secondary antibodies (cat. no. sc-2004) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.
Cell growth assay
After infection with either shCtrl or shIARS2 lentivirus, the infectedA375 cells were seeded into 96-well plates (1×103 cells per well). The plates were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 5 days. During this period, cell number was imaged and counted by Celigo® Image Cytometer (Nexcelom Bioscience) every day.Moreover, cell viability was measured every day by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-Yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) reagent. Melanoma cells transfected with shIARS2 or shCtrl were cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 24 h, then detached with 0.25% trypsin solution, and placed in 96-well plates at a final concentration of 2,000 cells/ml. MTT assay was performed at 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 h following transfection. Briefly, the culture medium was replaced and 10 µl MTT solution/well was added. The cells with MTT were incubated for 4 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. Post incubation, the cells were washed and 200 µl dimethyl sulfoxide/well was added. Finally, the cells were incubated at room temperature for 10 min. Absorbance of stained supernatants was detected at 490 nm using a spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Cell viability / proliferation is directly proportional to the absorbance rate. The experiment was performed in triplicate.
Colony formation assay
A375 shCtrl and IARS2 knockdown cells were plated (1,000 cells/well) in a 6-well culture plate in triplicate. The culture medium were refreshed every three days for 10 days or until colonies were formed. Following colony formation, they were washed twice with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, and stained with 0.4% crystal violet for 15 min. The number of colonies containing ≥50 cells was counted under a microscope.
Flow cytometry analysis
Cell apoptosis was evaluated by flow cytometry according to the manufacturer's instructions. After A375 cells infected with shIARS2-lentivirus or shCtrl lentivirus were cultured in 6-well plates for 5 days, they were collected and washed with cold PBS. Then, a 100 μl cell suspension was prepared and stained with 5 μl of Annexin V-APC and 5 μl of 7-AAD (BD Biosciences) for 15 min. The ratio of apoptotic cells was analysed by a flow cytometer (EMD Millipore).For analysis of caspase 3/7 activity, the lentivirus-infectedA375 cells (2×104 cells per well) were cultured in 96-well plates for 5 days. Then 100 µl Caspase-Glo 3/7 reagent (Promega Corporation) was added and the cells were incubated for 2 h. The luminescence of each sample was measured in a luminometer plate reader according to the manufacturer's instruction.For cell cycle analysis, the lentiviral vector-transduced A375 cells were labelled with propidium iodide (Merck KGaA) and analysed using a flow cytometer. Annexin V-APC-positive cells were considered apoptotic regardless of the 7-AAD status.
Clinical samples and immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining
In this study, tumour samples of patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma between January 2012 and December 2017 were collected. A total of 30 melanoma tissues and 30 surrounding skin tissue were examined for the expression of IARS2 protein using IHC. All paraffin-embedded tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Briefly, the slides were deparaffinized with xylene and rehydrated in graded alcohol. Antigen was retrieved and endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by 3% hydrogen peroxide for 30 min. The slides were then incubated with goat serum to block the non-specific proteins (Bioz, Inc.). Subsequently, the slides were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibody against IARS2 (Abcam), and finally incubated with biotinylated secondary antibody (Bioz, Inc.) for 1 h at room temperature. Tris buffered saline with Tween-20 was used in the washing steps. All sections were scored blindly by two investigators under a light microscope and recorded. The tissue staining was scored by the percentage of positive staining cells. The percentage of positive cells was scored as negative (score 0: <1% of tumour cells stain positive, or 1: 1–5% of tumour cells stain positive) or positive (score 2: 6–25%, score 3: 26–50%, score 4: >50% positive of the tumour area). Scores of each subgroup of clinicopathological parameters are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Man-Whitney U test was applied for comparisons between two groups.Ethical approval was obtained from the clinical research Ethics Committee of Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University (2016142) (Jinan, China). Written informed consent for the acquisition and use of tissue samples was obtained from all patients.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis were performed using SPSS 16.0 (SPSS, Inc.). The statistical data for each group are presented as the mean ± SD. T-test was used for comparison between two groups. Continuous data from multiple groups were analyzed by using one-way ANOVA, with the Tukey's post hoc test. P<0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.
Results
Expression of IARS2 in four melanoma cell lines
To explore the role of IARS2 in humanmelanoma development, we first detected the expression of IARS2 in three humanmelanoma cell lines, including A375, MUM-2B, and C918, using RT-qPCR. We also detected the protein levels of IARS2 in the three melanoma cell lines. The results showed that IARS2 mRNA and protein were expressed in all three cell lines (Fig. 1A and B).
Figure 1.
Knockdown of IARS2 expression in A375 cells. (A) IARS2 mRNA expression levels in three melanoma cancer cell lines. IARS2 mRNA expression was measured in the three melanoma cell lines, A375, MUM-2B, and C918, using quantitative RT-PCR assay. GAPDH mRNA expression levels were used to normalize expression levels of IARS2. Data from multiple groups were analyzed by using one-way ANOVA, with the Tukey's post hoc test. P>0.05. (B) IARS2 protein levels in three melanoma cancer cell lines. (C) Assessment of efficiency of infection of A375 cells with shIARS2 or shCtrl lentiviral vectors. IARS2 mRNA expression in A375 cells was determined by quantitative RT-PCR after infection with shIARS2 lentivirus or shCtrl lentivirus. T-test was used for comparison between two groups. *P<0.05. (D) IARS2 protein expression in A375 cells was determined by western blot analysis in shIARS2 A375 cells compared with shCtrl A375 cells. (E) A375 cells were infected with IARS2-siRNA or NC lentivirus and examined by fluorescence microscopy and light microscopy at day 3 post-infection. Note that most of the cells express GFP. Magnification, ×100. Representative images of the cultures are shown.
Knockdown of IARS2 in A375 cells
To further investigate the function of IARS2 in humanmelanoma, we conducted lentivirus-mediated knockdown of IARS2 in the humanmelanoma cell line A375, and quantified its expression by RT-qPCR (Fig. 1C-E). By day 3 post-infection, fluorescence microscopy was used to detect the GFP expression. As shown in Fig. 1E, the proportion of infected cells was >80%. As shown in Fig. 1C, IARS2 mRNA was significantly downregulated in A375 cells infected with shIARS2 lentivirus compared to cells treated with shCtrl lentivirus (P<0.05). Knockdown efficiency was also examined by western blot analysis, IARS2 protein expression was significantly reduced in shIARS2 A375 cells compared to shCtrl A375 cells (Fig. 1D). All the results demonstrated effective knockdown of IARS2 in A375 cells.
Knockdown of IARS2 inhibits human melanoma cell growth and colony formation
To determine the effect of IARS2 expression on humanmelanoma cell growth, we infectedA375 cells with shIARS2 lentivirus or shCtrl lentivirus, and analysed the cell growth every day for 5 days by counting the number of cells. We found that the cell growth rate of shIARS2 A375 cells was dramatically decreased compared to shCtrl A375 cells (Fig. 2A-B).
Figure 2.
Effect of IARS2 knockdown on A375 cell proliferation. (A) A375 cell infection with shIARS2 lentivirus or shCtrl lentivirus was imaged and analysed using a Celigo cytometer. (B) The number of cells was counted every day for 5 days (shCtrl vs. shIARS2). (C) Proliferation of shIARS2 A375 cells and shCtrl A375 cells was evaluated by MTT assay. Bars represent the mean ± standard deviation. T-test was used for comparison between shCtrl and shIARS2 groups at each time point. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001. Data from multiple time points of either shCtrl or shIARS2 group were analyzed by using one-way ANOVA, with the Tukey's post hoc test. Compared to day 1, P<0.05; compared to day 2, P<0.05; compared to day 3, P<0.05; compared to day 4, P<0.05.
To confirm the inhibitory effect of IARS2 on humanmelanoma cell growth, we detected the proliferation of A375 cells by MTT assay every day for 5 days. MTT assay showed that melanoma cell proliferation was significantly inhibited in shIARS2 A375 cells compared with shCtrl A375 cells (Fig. 2C).Furthermore, a colony formation assay was performed. The results of the assay confirmed that IARS2 knockdown significantly inhibited the colony formation of A375 cells (Fig. 3; P<0.05).
Figure 3.
Effect of IARS2 knockdown on colony formation ability of A375 cells. (A) A375 cells were seeded in 6-well plates (1,000 cells/well) for colony formation assay. Plate clone formation assay showed that suppression of IARS2 expression significantly inhibited cell proliferation compared to shCtrl cells. (B) T-test was used for comparison between shCtrl and shIARS2 groups at each time point. *P<0.05. (C) Clone formation of cells in shIARS2 and shCtrl groups (magnification, ×100).
Effect of IARS2 knockdown on apoptosis and cell cycle
As is well known, apoptosis is associated with the mechanism of tumour progression. We detected whether knockdown of IARS2 affects cell apoptosis. Double staining with Annexin V-APC and 7-AAD showed that the proportion of apoptotic A375 cells in the shCtrl and shIARS2 groups was 2.62±0.35% and 8.77±1.32%, respectively (P<0.05), suggesting that knockdown of IARS2 significantly enhanced cell apoptosis compared with the negative control group (Fig. 4A). Moreover, this result was further validated by caspase 3/7 activity analysis. We observed that caspase 3 and 7 activities were significantly upregulated in shIARS2 A375 cells compared to shCtrl A375 cells (Fig. 4B). Taken together, these data suggested that knockdown of IARS2 promoted humanmelanoma cell apoptosis.
Figure 4.
Effect of IARS2 knockdown on A375 cell apoptosis and cell cycle. (A) Cell apoptosis was determined using Annexin V–APC/7-AAD staining and flow cytometry. Analysis of data from quadrant regions in the dot plots were interpreted as follows: N1, the top left quadrant designates necrotic cells that are 7-AAD-positive and annexin V-APC-negative; N2, the top right quadrant includes late apoptotic cells that are annexin V-APC and 7-AAD-positive; N3, the bottom left quadrant specifies unstained viable cells that are annexin V-APC and 7-AAD double-negative; and N4, the right bottom quadrant denotes early apoptotic cells that are annexin V-APC-positive, but 7-AAD-negative. The number of apoptotic shIARS2 A375 cells was significantly higher than the number of apoptotic shCtrl A375 cells. (B) Caspase 3/7 activity was significantly higher in shIARS2 A375 cells compared to shCtrl A375 cells. Τ-test was used for comparison between shCtrl and shIARS2 groups. **P<0.01. (C) Cell cycle was assessed in A375 cells after transfection with the indicated shRNAs. Representative flow-cytograms are shown. Bar graphs indicate the mean percentages. Τ-test was used for comparison between shCtrl and shIARS2 groups at each time point. *P<0.05.
Cell cycle analysis showed that knockdown of IARS2 affected the distribution of cell cycle phases (Fig. 4C). Compared to control cells, the proportion of G0/G1 cells increased, while that of S cells decreased in IARS2-siRNA group (Fig. 4C, P<0.05).
Expression of IARS2 protein in melanoma tissues
To further demonstrate the role of IARS2 in humanmelanoma development, we detected the expression of IARS2 in clinical melanomapatient tissues by IHC (Fig. 5). Tumour tissues and surrounding skin tissues from 30 patients were examined for the expression of IARS2 protein in this study. The male-to-female ratio was 1.3:1. The age of the patients ranged from 23–79 years, and a median age was 61 years. The results showed that expression of IARS2 was higher in tumour tissues (Fig. 5A) than in adjacent skin tissue (Fig. 5B and C; P<0.05). The staining of the IARS2 revealed that it was mainly localised in the cytoplasm with brown positive granules in tumour tissues (Fig. 5A, E and H). Fig. 5E shows the IHC staining of IARS2 in tumour tissue obtained from an IARS2-positive melanomapatient (pathological no. S1302026). Fig. 5H shows the same staining pattern of IARS2 in a tissue section obtained from another IARS2-positive melanomapatient (pathological no. S1408271).
Figure 5.
Expression of IARS2 protein in melanoma tissues. (A) Representative micrographs of the staining patterns of IARS2 in melanoma. (B) The staining of IARS2 in normal skin tissue was negative. (C) The expression of IARS2 was higher in the melanoma tumour cells than in the normal skin tissue. Τ-test was used for comparison between tumour tissues and normal skin tissues. **P<0.01. (D-E): HE staining (green arrow indicates melanoma cells) and (D) IHC staining of IARS2, (E) in a tissue section obtained from an IARS2-positive melanoma patient. (F) A partially enlarged image of Fig. 5E. (G-H) HE staining (green arrow indicates melanoma cells) and (G) IHC staining of IARS2, (H) in a tissue section obtained from another IARS2-positive melanoma patient. (I) A partially enlarged image of Fig. 5E. IHC staining in tissue sections of melanoma lesions (microphotograph obtained with a magnification, ×400; scale bar: 50 μm). Positive cells stained brown. Staining was primarily observed in the cell cytoplasm (red arrows).
Discussion
Melanoma is the most dangerous skin cancer and accounts for the most skin cancer-related deaths worldwide (30,31). The improvement in diagnosis and clinical therapy has led to 5-year survival of melanomapatients. However, doctors have been able to do very little to treat metastatic melanoma. In addition, development and progression of melanoma still remain poorly understood. In order to identify more effective therapeutic strategy for treating melanoma, it is very important to identify the novel factors that are related to melanoma incidence and progression and to unravel the underlying mechanisms (32,33). Hence, there is an urgent need to identify novel factors associated with melanoma and strategies to improve melanoma treatment.Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARS) identify the cognate amino acid to catalyse the aminoacylation of tRNA (34). Apart from protein synthesis, recent studies have shown that AARS are also involved in several other pathophysiological processes, including inflammation, angiogenesis, and tumorigenesis. It has been reported that genetic mutation in the glycyl-tRNA synthetase coding region is associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2D and distal spinal muscular atrophy type V (35). Humantyrosyl-tRNA synthetase promotes angiogenesis but humantryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase suppresses vascular growth (36). The human glutamyl-tRNA synthetase regulates cell apoptosis via interaction with apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (37). AARS are aberrantly expressed in several types of cancers, suggesting their potential association with tumorigenesis (38).IARS2 encodes for mitochondrial form of isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase, which belongs to the class-I AARS family. The mitochondrial isoleucine-tRNA synthetase was first synthesized in the cytoplasm, and then, transported into the mitochondrion. Recent studies have shown that IARS2 is involved in several diseases. In 2014, the clinical features of patients with IARS2 mutation were reported including growth hormone deficiency, partial deafness, cataracts, and peripheral neuropathy (22). High expression level of IARS2 attenuated the clinical manifestations of patients with mtDNA mutation (39). Importantly, IARS2 exhibited a vital role in the incidence and development of colon cancer (23). IARS2 was highly expressed in humancolon cancer tissue compared to surrounding tissues. Several studies have indicated that IARS2 may be a cancer-promoting gene (23,25–28).In our study, melanoma cancer cell lines, A375, MUM-2B, and C918, were selected for the experiment. First it was found that the mRNA expression level of IARS2 was high in all four cell lines (Fig. 1A). IHC analysis also confirmed a higher expression of IARS2 protein in clinical melanoma tissues than in surrounding tissues (Fig. 5). Further cytological study showed that knockdown of IARS2 inhibited A375 cell proliferation and colony formation (Figs. 2 and 3). Flow cytometry revealed that knockdown of IARS2 promoted cell apoptosis and influenced cell cycle distribution (Fig. 4). Our results suggested that IARS2 may be involved in the development and progression of melanoma.MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. They play pivotal roles during several biological processes, including tumorigenesis in melanoma (40,41). MiRNA expression levels are regulated in response to various factors, including toxicant stresses in the environment (42). Based on their genomic location, miRNAs are generally classified as ‘intergenic’ or ‘intronic.’ The ‘intronic’ miRNAs share the promoter with their host gene and they are usually expressed along with their host gene indicating the functional association with their host gene (43). IARS2 is the host gene of miR-215, a member of the miR-192/215 family. In colon tissues, miR-215 expression was shown to be positively correlated with expression of its host gene, IARS2, which indicated that miR215 was transcribed together with IARS2 (44). The expression of miR-215 might be abnormal after IARS2 was knocked down in A375melanoma cells. Previous studies showed that miR-215 plays an important role in tumour development and metastasis (45–47). It may promote cell proliferation, repress apoptosis, and alter the cell cycle (45,46). Thus, the inhibition of proliferation of A375 cells with IARS2 knockdown might be also associated with the alteration of miR-215 expression in shIARS2 cells. However, this speculation still needs to be proved.In conclusion, our study showed that downregulation of IARS2 expression by lentivirus-delivered small interfering RNA in A375 cells inhibited cell proliferation and colony formation, induced cell cycle arrest, and upregulated caspase 3/7 activity, which then promoted cell death through apoptosis. Therefore, knockdown of IARS2 might be a potential therapeutic approach for melanoma in which IARS2 is highly expressed.
Authors: Jeremy Schwartzentruber; Daniela Buhas; Jacek Majewski; Florin Sasarman; Simon Papillon-Cavanagh; Isabelle Thiffault; Isabelle Thiffaut; Katherine M Sheldon; Christine Massicotte; Lysanne Patry; Mariella Simon; Amir S Zare; Kevin J McKernan; Jacques Michaud; Richard G Boles; Cheri L Deal; Valerie Desilets; Eric A Shoubridge; Mark E Samuels Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2014-10-18 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Claus Garbe; Ketty Peris; Axel Hauschild; Philippe Saiag; Mark Middleton; Lars Bastholt; Jean-Jacques Grob; Josep Malvehy; Julia Newton-Bishop; Alexander J Stratigos; Hubert Pehamberger; Alexander M Eggermont Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 9.162