| Literature DB >> 32722487 |
Wan Nur Fatanah Wan Mohammad1, Li-Shen Soh1, Wan Nurainie Wan Ismail2, G Veera Singham1.
Abstract
The tropical bed bug, Cimex hemipterus (F.), has now emerged as an important public health pest in the tropics. Despite its alarming infestation rate, the information on its population genetics remains scarce. Here, we described the infestation structure and population dynamics of C. hemipterus in the tropics, especially Malaysia and Singapore, based on eight novel microsatellites and two mtDNA markers, including cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) and 16S rRNA genes. Across populations, microsatellite data revealed high genetic diversity with significant genetic differentiation and restricted gene flow. Analysis within populations revealed evidence of a recent bottleneck. Nonetheless, elevated genetic diversity in nearly all populations suggests that the propagule in C. hemipterus populations were much diverse, distantly related (mean r = 0.373), and not significantly inbred (mean FIS = 0.24) than that observed in Cimex lectularius from previous studies. We observed seven mtDNA haplotypes across the 18 populations studied (Hd = 0.593) and several populations displayed more than one matrilineal descent. The two markers were generally congruent in suggesting a common, genetically diverse (especially at the nuclear region) source population with possibilities of multiple introductions for the bed bug populations in the present study.Entities:
Keywords: Cimex hemipterus; bed bug; infestation dynamics; microsatellite; mtDNA; population genetics
Year: 2020 PMID: 32722487 PMCID: PMC7469168 DOI: 10.3390/insects11080472
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Samples location and the types of molecular markers used in the study.
| Population ID | Longitude | Latitude | Type of Infestation Unit | City, Country | mtDNA Haplotypes a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMV | 1°17′04″ N | 103°49′23″ E | Private residence | Bukit Merah, Singapore | Hap05 (5) |
| TPL | 1°20′08″ N | 103°51′12″ E | Private residence | Toa Payoh, Singapore | Hap03 (5) |
| CC | 1°19′39″ N | 103°55′37″ E | Private residence | Bedok, Singapore | Hap01 (5) |
| MJ | 3°09’05.7″ N | 101°41’46.5″ E | Hotel | Jalan Melayu, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | Hap01 (5) |
| LVKL | 3°08’41.6″ N | 101°41’51.5″ E | Backpacker’s hostel | Jalan Petaling, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | Hap01 (2), Hap02 (1), Hap04 (2) |
| FKL | 3°08’39.6″ N | 101°41’44.7″ E | Backpacker’s hostel | Jalan Hang Kasturi, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | Hap01 (2), Hap06 (3) |
| BLD | 5°19’57.3″ N | 100°17’39.8″ E | Worker’s hostel | Bayan Lepas, Penang, Malaysia | Hap01 (5) |
| TT | 5°27’2″ N | 100°18’24″ E | Private residence | Tanjung Tokong, Penang, Malaysia | Hap01 (4), Hap07 (1) |
| BLA | 5°19’49″ N | 100°17’36″ E | Private residence | Bayan Lepas, Penang, Malaysia | Hap04 (5) |
| JT | 5°25’04.7″ N | 100°19’46.0″ E | Worker’s hostel | Georgetown, Penang, Malaysia | Hap01 (5) |
| NI | 5°20’27.6″ N | 100°18’06.7″ E | Worker’s hostel | Bayan Lepas, Penang, Malaysia | Hap01 (2), Hap04 (3) |
| PJ | 5°20’18.1″ N | 100°18’09.1″ E | Worker’s hostel | Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia | Hap01 (3), Hap04 (2) |
| MC | 5°24’12.2″ N | 100°20’03.4″ E | Private residence | Georgetown, Penang, Malaysia | Hap01 (5) |
| BM | 5°18’48.6″ N | 100°27’42.6″ E | Worker’s hostel | Bukit Mertajam, Penang, Malayisa | Hap01 (5) |
| SJ | 5°23’08.4″ N | 100°24’21.7″ E | Private residence | Seberang Perai, Penang, Malaysia | Hap04 (5) |
| BPT | 5°13’25.8″ N | 103°06’27.8″ E | Private residence | Bukit Payong, Terengganu, Malaysia | Hap04 (5) |
| KJO | 1°39’06.3″ N | 103°36’58.4″ E | Worker’s hostel | Kulai, Johor, Malaysia | Hap01 (5) |
| PJO | 1°22’08.5″ N | 104°06’25.9″ E | Worker’s hostel | Pengerang, Johor, Malaysia | Hap01 (5) |
a Haplotypes designation as determined based on the concatenated dataset of 16S rRNA and COI genes. Numbers in bracket indicate number of individuals carrying the haplotype.
Figure 1Sampling location of the bed bugs samples from the current study.
Characteristics of eight microsatellite loci across 18 populations of C. hemipterus.
| Locus | Primer Sequences (5′–3′) | Repeat Motif | Locus Size (bp) |
| PIC |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bhe27 | GGGCTGATGAAGAAATATAGCAC | (CT)8 | 385 | 6 | 0.51 | 0.42 | 0.32 |
| Bhe14 | GGAGTTGTTGGGTTAAGGAGTG | (ATT)10 | 162 | 7 | 0.74 | 0.64 | 0.56 |
| Bhe34 | TGGGATGTGCAATGTGACC | (ATC)6 | 252 | 5 | 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.11 |
| Bhe07 | GCAGTCAAAGACAGTTAGCC | (AC)9 | 310 | 6 | 0.53 | 0.50 | 0.44 |
| Bhe38 | TCGCCTTACACTTCTCGTAG | (AAAT)5 | 384 | 6 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.46 |
| Bhe40 | CCTTGCCATATCAGCACGTT | (AAT)16 | 171 | 12 | 0.79 | 0.56 | 0.45 |
| Bhe12 | AACGGATTGGCCTATGAGC | (AG)13 | 315 | 8 | 0.81 | 0.61 | 0.50 |
| Bhe22 | ACTCATTTAGGCTCCAGCAAC | (CT)8 | 331 | 4 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.07 |
| Mean | 6.75 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.36 |
NA is total number of alleles detected; PIC is polymorphic information content; HE is expected heterozygosity; HO is observed heterozygosity.
Summary statistics of 351 C. hemipterus samples from 18 populations genotyped at eight microsatellite loci.
| Pop | N |
|
| HWE | G–W |
| A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JT | 20 | 0.64 | 0.66 | Bhe27 | 0.12 | 0.47 | 0. 361 (0.016) | 3.75 |
| BLD | 20 | 0.52 | 0.55 | Bhe22 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.124 (0.019) | 3.88 |
| NI | 17 | 0.36 | 0.47 | - | 0.09 | 0.23 | 0.494 (0.018) | 2.63 |
| MC | 20 | 0.41 | 0.49 | Bhe22 | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.390 (0.016) | 2.88 |
| BM | 20 | 0.40 | 0.49 | Bhe22 | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.326 (0.019) | 3.88 |
| SJ | 17 | 0.33 | 0.60 | Bhe14, Bhe38, Bhe40 | 0.10 | 0.46 | 0.295 (0.019) | 3.13 |
| BLA | 20 | 0.34 | 0.49 | Bhe07, Bhe22 | 0.10 | 0.31 | 0.320 (0.020) | 3.13 |
| TT | 20 | 0.29 | 0.40 | Bhe22 | 0.10 | 0.27 | 0.361 (0.020) | 3.00 |
| PJ | 20 | 0.35 | 0.55 | Bhe12 | 0.09 | 0.37 | 0.331 (0.019) | 2.75 |
| BPT | 20 | 0.35 | 0.37 | - | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.844 (0.007) | 1.88 |
| FKL | 20 | 0.45 | 0.52 | Bhe22 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.226 (0.019) | 3.25 |
| MJ | 20 | 0.44 | 0.55 | Bhe07, Bhe22 | 0.11 | 0.22 | 0.231 (0.017) | 3.25 |
| LVKL | 20 | 0.36 | 0.42 | - | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.495 (0.017) | 3.13 |
| KJO | 20 | 0.23 | 0.38 | Bhe40, Bhe12 | 0.09 | 0.40 | 0.358 (0.020) | 2.63 |
| PJO | 17 | 0.29 | 0.45 | - | 0.09 | 0.36 | 0.342 (0.019) | 2.63 |
| TPL | 20 | 0.27 | 0.44 | Bhe14, Bhe22 | 0.10 | 0.39 | 0.444 (0.020) | 3.13 |
| CC | 20 | 0.30 | 0.41 | Bhe07, Bhe38 | 0.10 | 0.28 | 0.495 (0.017) | 3.13 |
| BMV | 20 | 0.71 | 0.62 | Bhe22 | 0.11 | −0.15 | 0.275 (0.019) | 3.25 |
| Mean | 19.5 | 0.39 | 0.49 | - | 0.10 | 0.24 | 0.373 (0.018) | 3.07 |
N is sample size; HE is expected heterozygosity; HO is observed heterozygosity; HWE refers to locus that shows significant departure from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium within each population; G–W is Garza–Williamson Index FIS is inbreeding coefficient; r is relatedness coefficient; A is mean number of alleles per locus.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of C. hemipterus as inferred from eight microsatellite markers.
| Source of Variation | df | Sum of Square | Variance Component | Total Variance (%) | Fixation Index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among populations | 17 | 740.65 | 1.03 | 28.50 | <0.001 | |
| Among individuals within populations | 333 | 1088.86 | 0.68 | 18.67 | <0.001 | |
| Within individuals | 351 | 672.50 | 1.92 | 52.83 | <0.001 |
Bayesian analysis of population structure (BAPS) analysis showing population clusters and the proportion of admixed individuals in each population.
| Cluster | Infestation Unit | Proportion of Admixture (Total Sample) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | BMV | 0 (20) |
| 2 | TPL | 0 (20) |
| 3 | CC | 0 (20) |
| 4 | MJ | 0.05 (20) |
| 5 | LVKL | 0 (20) |
| 6 | FKL | 0 (20) |
| 7 | BLD | 0.05 (20) * |
| 8 | TT | 0 (20) |
| 9 | BLA | 0.10 (20) * |
| 10 | JT | 0 (20) |
| 11 | NI | 0 (17) |
| 12 | PJ | 0 (20) |
| 13 | MC | 0 (20) |
| 14 | BM | 0 (20) |
| 15 | SJ | 0 (17) |
| 16 | BPT | 0 (20) |
| 17 | KJO | 0 (20) |
| PJO | 0 (17) |
* significant admixture; p < 0.05.
Figure 2Minimum spanning network showing relationship among seven mtDNA haplotypes based on 909 bp concatenated mtDNA sequences. Each circle denotes inferred haplotypes drawn to proportionate number of individuals. Details of individuals representing each haplotype were given in Table 1. Numbers above branches indicate mutation positions between haplotypes (also see Supplementary Table S5 for information on base positions).
Figure 3Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree inferred from seven concatenated 909 bp mtDNA haplotypes. The bootstrap values were provided at each node. Details of individuals representing each haplotype were given in Table 1.
Summary statistics of mtDNA genetic variations.
| mtDNA Sequence | n | h | Hd |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COI | 90 | 5 | 0.483 ± 0.049 | 0.00095 (0.546) | 0.00171 | 0.986 |
| 16S rRNA | 90 | 3 | 0.168 ± 0.052 | 0.00051 (0.171) | 0.00118 | 0.394 |
| COI + 16S rRNA | 90 | 7 | 0.593 ± 0.046 | 0.00079 (0.718) | 0.00152 | 1.380 |
n is number of sequences, h is number of haplotypes, Hd is haplotype diversity ± SD, π is nucleotide diversity, k is average number of nucleotide differences, θs is theta per site, θg is theta per sequence.