| Literature DB >> 32722446 |
Alexey Kudrinskiy1,2, Pavel Zherebin1, Alexander Gusev3,4,5, Olga Shapoval6, Jaeho Pyee7, Georgy Lisichkin1, Yurii Krutyakov1,2.
Abstract
The use of silver nanoparticles (NPs) in medical, industrial and agricultural fields is becoming more widespread every year. This leads to an increasing number of experimental toxicological and microbiological studies of silver NPs aimed at establishing the risk-benefit ratio for their application. The following key parameters affecting the biological activity of silver dispersions are traditionally taken into consideration: mean diameter of NPs, surface potential of NPs and equilibrium concentration of Ag+. These characteristics are mainly predetermined by the chemical nature of the capping agent used for stabilization. However, the extent to which they influence the biological activity and the toxicity of silver NPs varies greatly. In this work, dispersions of silver NPs stabilized with a wide array of substances of different chemical nature were used for quantitative evaluation of whether the various measurable properties of silver NPs fit as descriptors of linear QNAR (quantitative nanostructure-activity relationship) models for silver NP toxicity evaluation with respect to a model eukaryotic microorganism-Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast cells. It was shown that among the factors that determine silver NP toxicity, the charge of particles, their colloidal stability and the ability to generate Ag+ ions carry more importance than the descriptors related to the particle size. A significant synergistic effect between the ζ-potential and the colloidal stability of silver NPs on their toxicity was also discovered. Following this, a new descriptor has been proposed for the integral characterization of the silver dispersion colloidal stability. According to the obtained data, it can be considered applicable for building QNAR models of higher efficacy. The validity testing of the proposed model for theoretical prediction of silver NP toxicity using a wide range of living organisms has shown that this new descriptor correlates with toxicity much better compared to most traditionally used descriptors. Consequently, it seems promising in terms of being used not only in situations involving the rather narrow array of the objects tested, but also for the construction of silver NP toxicity models with respect to other living organisms.Entities:
Keywords: QNAR; S. cerevisiae; capping agent; colloidal stability; cyanobacteria; fungi; multiple linear regression; silver nanoparticles; toxicity; zebrafish; ζ-potential
Year: 2020 PMID: 32722446 PMCID: PMC7466614 DOI: 10.3390/nano10081459
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
The list of stabilizers of different chemical classes used for the synthesis of silver nanoparticles (NPs). Each aqueous dispersion contained 100 µg/mL of silver and the minimum amount of the capping agent c (St) needed to effectively stabilize silver NPs.
| Structural Formula of a Stabilizer and Its Name | Abbreviation | |
|---|---|---|
| Trisodium citrate | Citrate | 0.045 |
| Surfactants | ||
| Sodium dodecyl sulfate | SDS | 0.05 |
| Sodium laureth sulfate, | SLES | 0.1 |
| Sodium α-olefin sulfonate, | AOS | 0.05 |
| Coco trimethylammonium methoxy sulfate, | CTMAM | 0.15 |
| Alkoxy polyethylene glycol, | APG | 0.5 |
| Sodium coco aminodipropionate, | AMA | 0.08 |
| Sodium tallow amphopolycarboxyglycinate, | STAPCG | 0.05 |
| Nonylphenol ethoxylated | NPE | 0.5 |
| Polyoxyethylenesorbitan monooleate, | Tween-80 | 0.1 |
| Didecyl dimethylammonium chloride | DDDMAC | 0.02 |
| Benzyldimethyl [3-(myristoylamino)-propyl] ammonium chloride | BDMMAC | 0.02 |
| Polymers | ||
| Polyhexamethylene biguanide hydrochloride | PHMB | 0.01 |
| Polyhexamethylene guanidine hydrochloride | PHMG | 0.01 |
| Polydimethyldiallylammonium chloride | PDMDAAC | 0.001 |
| Polyacrylic acid | PAA | 0.01 |
| Ethoxylated polydimethylsiloxane | EPDMS | 0.25 |
| Xanthan gum, | Xanthan gum | 0.01 |
Figure 1Differences in the absorption spectra of the dispersions of silver NPs; A is the optical density.
Figure 2(A) The typical TEM images, (B) electron microdiffraction patterns, and (C) schematic representation of the stabilizing layer of the BDMMAC with glucose as the reducing agent and SLES-stabilized silver NPs (A’), (B’), (C’).
Figure 3Typical X-ray diffractograms of the irreversibly coagulated silver NPs stabilized with (A) BDMMAC (with glucose as the reducing agent), and (B) PHMB, with the characteristic peaks corresponding to interplanar distances of the crystalline silver.
Characteristics of the dispersions of silver NPs; d—mean diameter of silver NPs; Ssp—specific surface; c (KCl)—KCl concentration initiating the dispersion coagulation; k‘—averaged effective rate constant for oxidation of silver NPs by H2O2.
| Capping Agent | ζ-Potential (mV) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citrate | −31 ± 1 | 7.5 (4–17) | 48 ± 5 | 20 ± 5 | 0.11 ± 0.02 |
| Polymers | |||||
| PAA | −43 ± 2 | 40 (10–50) | 12 ± 1 | 180 ± 5 | 0.8 ± 0.1 |
| Xanthan gum | −22 ± 2 | 10 (2–17) | 41 ± 4 | 60 ± 5 | 0.2 ± 0.03 |
| EPDMS | +8 ± 1 | 16 (9–30) | 26 ± 3 | 120 ± 5 | - |
| PDMDAAC | +31 ± 1 | 8.5 (6–17) | 50 ± 5 | 80 ± 5 | - |
| PHMG | +39 ± 2 | 7 (5–20) | 52 ± 5 | 40 ± 5 | 0.9 ± 0.1 |
| PHMB | +46 ± 1 | 3.5 (2–6) | 82 ± 8 | 80 ± 5 | 1.2 ± 0.2 |
| Surfactants | |||||
| AMA | −56 ± 1 | 9.5 (5–25) | 43 ± 4 | 480 ± 5 | 0.9 ± 0.1 |
| STAPCG | −54 ± 1 | 8.5 (6–20) | 48 ± 5 | 1 130 ± 5 | 0.8 ± 0.1 |
| AOS | −48 ± 2 | 8 (6–20) | 42 ± 4 | 40 ± 5 | 0.9 ± 0,1 |
| SLES | −46 ± 1 | 7.5 (4–17) | 48 ± 5 | 30 ± 5 | 0.25 ± 0.04 |
| SDS | −41 ± 1 | 10 (7–20) | 38 ± 4 | 30 ± 5 | 0.6 ± 0.1 |
| Tween-80 | −18 ± 1 | 12 (9–25) | 32 ± 4 | 300 ± 5 | - |
| APG | −9 ± 1 | 11 (3–30) | 35 ± 3 | 360 ± 5 | 1.8 ± 0.3 |
| NPE | −12 ± 1 | 8 (5–20) | 44 ± 5 | 410 ± 5 | - |
| CTMAM | +34 ± 1 | 3 (2–6) | 93 ± 6 | 170 ± 5 | - |
| DDDMAC | +49 ± 1 | 10 (4–15) | 38 ± 4 | 300 ± 5 | 1.4 ± 0.2 |
| BDMMAC-B * | +54 ± 2 | 25 (12–40) | 18 ± 3 | 240 ± 5 | - |
| BDMMAC-G ** | +23 ± 1 | 50 (25–100) | 9 ± 3 | 110 ± 5 | - |
* silver NP dispersion obtained by the borohydride reduction method; ** silver NP dispersion obtained by the glucose reduction method.
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of silver NPs capped with different stabilizers introduced into the nutrient-infused medium towards S. cerevisiae cells; the nanosilver/capping agent ratio is given in Table 1.
| Capping Agent | MIC (µg/mL) | log10 (MIC) | Capping Agent | MIC (µg/mL) | log10 (MIC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citrate | 50 | 1.699 | Surfactants | ||
| Polymers | AOS | 12.5 | 1.097 | ||
| PAA | 12.5 | 1.097 | SLES | 50 | 1.699 |
| Xanthan gum | 25 | 1.398 | SDS | 25 | 1.398 |
| EPDMS | 50 | 1.699 | Tween-80 | 25 | 1.398 |
| PDMDAAC | 25 | 1.398 | APG | 50 | 1.699 |
| PHMG | 6.25 | 0.796 | NPE | 25 | 1.398 |
| PHMB | 6.25 | 0.796 | CTMAM | 12.5 | 1.097 |
| Surfactants | DDDMAC | 3.12 | 0.495 | ||
| AMA | 6.25 | 0.796 | BDMMAC-B * | 3.12 | 0.495 |
| STAPCG | 6.25 | 0.796 | BDMMAC-G ** | 12.5 | 1.097 |
* silver NP dispersion obtained by the borohydride reduction method; ** silver NP dispersion obtained by the glucose reduction method.
Pearson linear correlation coefficients (r) between silver NP dispersion descriptors and their toxicity for yeast cells; |r| > 0.5 are in bold.
|
|
|
| ζ | |ζ| × | log10 (MIC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| - |
| −0.07 | 0.05 | 0.01 | −0.06 | −0.11 |
|
| - | - | −0.03 | 0.19 | 0.01 | 0.02 | −0.06 |
| - | - | - | −0.27 | 0.28 |
| −0.32 | |
| ζ | - | - | - | - | 0.48 | −0.28 | −0.40 |
| - | - | - | - | - | 0.12 | −0.41 | |
| |ζ| × | - | - | - | - | - | - | −0.48 |
| log10 (MIC) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Figure 4Effects of the ζ-potential and the silver NP resistance to KCl, c (KCl), on the NP toxicity to yeast cells. The size of each bubble is proportional to the MIC value of the corresponding dispersion; the smaller the size, the higher the biological activity of the dispersion.
Characteristics of QNAR linear models for the prediction of the toxicity of silver NP dispersions to yeast cells; parameter values that failed Student’s t-test (p > 0.5) are in bold.
| Descriptor | Regression Coefficient | Model No. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| - |
| 1.2 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 1.3± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 0.1 |
|
|
|
|
| −0.01 ± 0.01 | −0.004 ± 0.006 |
|
|
|
|
| - | |
| ζ |
| −0.007 ± 0.004 | −0.009 ± 0.004 | −0.007 ± 0.003 | −0.006 ± 0.002 |
|
| −0.7 ± 0.4 | - | - | - | |
| ζ × |
| - | 0.014 ± 0.007 | - | - |
| |ζ| × |
| - | - | −0.016 ± 0.006 | −0.018 ± 0.005 |
|
| |||||
| Number of data points | 12 | 12 | 12 | 19 | |
|
| 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.74 | |
| Residual sum of squares | 1.04 | 0.98 | 0.75 | 1.28 | |
LC50 values for silver NP dispersions in zebrafish embryos after 96 h of exposure.
| Abbr. of NPs According to [ | Capping Agent | LC50 (µg/mL) | R2 | log10 (LC50) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag_I | SLES | 0.219 | 0.993 | −0.660 |
| Ag_II | BDMMAC-B | 0.956 | 0.998 | −0.0195 |
| Ag_III_cr_0.2 | PHMB | 2.917 | 0.999 | 0.465 |
| Ag_IV_cr_12 | AMA | 0.515 | 0.999 | −0.288 |
| Ag_V | STAPCG | 2.488 | 0.961 | 0.396 |
Pearson linear correlation coefficient (r) values for silver NP dispersion descriptors and their toxicity for Danio rerio embryos log10 (LC50).
| Descriptor |
|
| ζ | |ζ| × | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| −0.13 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.8 * | 0.42 |
* excluding the k’ value for silver NPs capped with BDMMAC-B, data are unavailable.
Toxicity characteristics of silver NP dispersions with respect to R. solani, A. solani and Synechocystis sp.
| Capping Agent |
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC50 (µg/mL) | log10 (EC50) | EC50 (µg/mL) | log10 (LC50) | MIC (µg/mL) | log10 (MIC) | |
| APG | 50 | 1.70 | 75 | 1.88 | 2 | 0.30 |
| PHMB | 10 | 1.00 | 25 | 1.34 | - | - |
| AMA | 10 | 1.00 | 25 | 1.34 | 0.5 | −0.30 |
| STAPCG | 5 | 0.70 | 10 | 1.00 | 0.1 | −1.00 |
Pearson linear correlation coefficient (r) values for silver NP dispersion descriptors and their toxicity against R. solani and A. solani log10 (EC50) and Synechocystis sp. log10 (MIC).
| Descriptor |
|
| ζ | |ζ| × | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.46 | −0.41 | −0.52 | 0.28 | 0.96 | 0.74 |
|
| 0.35 | −0.29 | −0.67 | 0.36 | 0.93 | 0.84 |
|
| 0.99 | −0.98 | −0.94 | 0.82 | 0.89 | 1.00 |