| Literature DB >> 32722372 |
Sylwia Osuch1, Karin J Metzner2,3, Kamila Caraballo Cortés1.
Abstract
The long-term consequences of T cell responses' impairment in chronic HCV infection are not entirely characterized, although they may be essential in the context of the clinical course of infection, re-infection, treatment-mediated viral clearance and vaccine design. Furthermore, it is unclear whether a complete reinvigoration of HCV-specific T cell response may be feasible. In most studies, attempting to reverse the effects of compromised immune response quality by specific blockades of negative immune regulators, a restoration of functional competence of HCV-specific T cells was shown. This implies that HCV-induced immune dysfunction may be reversible. The advent of highly successful, direct-acting antiviral treatment (DAA) for chronic HCV infection instigated investigation whether the treatment-driven elimination of viral antigens restores T cell function. Most of studies demonstrated that DAA treatment may result in at least partial restoration of T cell immune function. They also suggest that a complete restoration comparable to that seen after spontaneous viral clearance may not be attained, pointing out that long-term antigenic stimulation imprints an irreversible change on the T cell compartment. Understanding the mechanisms of HCV-induced immune dysfunction and barriers to immune restoration following viral clearance is of utmost importance to diminish the possible long-term consequences of chronic HCV infection.Entities:
Keywords: T cell exhaustion; chronic HCV infection; direct acting antivirals; inhibitory receptors
Year: 2020 PMID: 32722372 PMCID: PMC7472290 DOI: 10.3390/v12080799
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Figure 1Quality of CD8+ T cell responses in resolving vs. chronic HCV infection (upper panel) and potential strategies aimed at restoration of exhausted T cell function in chronic HCV infection (lower panel).
Studies reporting the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitor blockades on CD8+ T cell function in HCV infection.
| Reference | Immune Checkpoint Blocked | Stage of HCV Infection | Number of Subjects | Character of the Study | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Golden Mason et al. [ | PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) | chronic | 7 | In vitro | ↑ proliferation of HCV-specific CD8+ T cells |
| Golden Mason et al. [ | Tim-3 | chronic | 4 | In vitro | ↑ proliferation of HCV-specific CD8+ T cells |
| Penna et al. [ | PD-L1 | chronic | 8 | In vitro | ↑ expansion of HCV-specific CD8+ T cells |
| Urbani et al. [ | PD-L1 | acute | 8 | In vitro | ↑ expansion and IFN-γ and IL-2 production but not the cytolytic activity of HCV-specific CD8+ T cells. |
| McMahan et al. [ | Tim-3, PD-L1, PD-L2 | acute/chronic | 6/4 | In vitro | ↑ proliferation of HCV-specific CD8+ T cells achieved by either PD-1 or Tim-3 blockade |
| Fuller et al. [ | PD-1 | chronic | 3 chimpanzees | In vivo | ↓ HCV viral load in one of three treated animals |
| Gardiner et al. [ | PD-1 | chronic | 54 | In vivo | ↓ viral load in five patients (two patients achieved undetectable HCV RNA) |
| Sangro et al. [ | CTLA-4 | chronic | 20 | In vivo | ↓ viral load sustained in most patients for 3 months follow-up; transient complete viral response in 15% of patients during follow-up |
↑ —increase; ↓ —decrease.
Studies reporting the effect of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment on peripheral T cell phenotype or function in chronic HCV infection.
| Reference | HCV Genotype | Number of Subjects | Effect of Treatment/Effect of Successful Treatment | Follow-up | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shrivastava et al. [ | 1 | 22 HIV/HCV co-infected | Effect of successful treatment | 12 weeks after the end of treatment (EOT) (sustained virologic response (SVR) 12) | ↓ PD1 and TIGIT expression on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells |
| Burchill et al. [ | 1a/1b | 19 | Effect of successful treatment | 24 weeks post-EOT (SVR24) | ↑ frequency of CD4+ T cells; |
| Najafi Fard et al. [ | 1–4 | HCV mono-infection | Effect of successful treatment | 12 weeks post-EOT | ↑ peripheral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells producing IFN-γ, IL-17, and IL-22 |
| Meissner et al. [ | 1 | 95 | Effect of treatment | up to 20 weeks after treatment initiation | ↑ peripheral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells early after treatment initiation |
| Lattanzi et al. [ | 1–4 | 45 | Effect of treatment | at first month of treatment (T1), at EOT (T2) and 12 weeks post-EOT (T3, SVR12) | stable percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells at T1 when compared to baseline |
| Emmanuel et al. [ | NA | HCV mono-infection ( | Effect of successful treatment | 1 or 2 years post-SVR | ↓ HLA-DR+CD38+ CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in both HCV infection and HIV/HCV co-infection |
| Vranjkovic | NA | 18 | Effect of successful treatment | 24 weeks post-SVR12 | phenotypic distribution of peripheral CD8+ T cell subsets in patients with advanced liver fibrosis (F4) different from those with minimal fibrosis (F0-1) which remained unchanged after viral elimination |
↑—increase; ↓—decrease; NA—not available.
Studies reporting the effect of DAA-treatment on peripheral HCV-specific T cell phenotype or function in chronic HCV infection.
| Reference | HCV Genotype | Number of Subjects | Effect of Treatment/Effect of Successful/Unsuccessful Treatment | Follow-up | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Romani et al. [ | 1a/1b | 26 | Effect of successful/unsuccessful treatment | at the end of treatment (EOT), at week 4 and 12 weeks post-EOT (sustained virologic response (SVR) 12) | higher levels of PD-1+ HCV-specific T cells at baseline and at EOT in patients who achieved SVR |
| Burchill et al. [ | 1a/1b | 7 | Effect of successful treatment | 24 weeks post -EOT (SVR24) | no significant change in the frequency of HCV-specific CD8+ T cells |
| Martin et al. [ | 1 | 51 | Effect of successful/unsuccessful treatment | treatment week 4, 12 and 24 weeks post-treatment (SVR24) | ↑ HCV-specific CD8+ T cells frequency after in vitro expansion in patients with SVR from baseline to 24 weeks after completion of treatment |
| Shrivastava et al. [ | 1 | 22 HIV-1/HCV co-infected | Effect of successful treatment | 12 weeks post-EOT (SVR12) | ↑ HCV-specific CD8+ T cells |
| Wieland et al. [ | 1a/1b | 21 | Effect of successful treatment | at EOT and 12 weeks post-EOT (SVR12) | ↓ terminally exhausted HCV-specific CD8+ T cells (TCF-1-CD127-PD1hi) after antigen elimination |
| Han et al. [ | 1b/2a | 41 | Effect of successful/unsuccessful treatment | treatment week 4, 12, 24 (EOT) and 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12) or week 4, 12 (EOT), and 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12) | ↑ HCV-specific CD8+ T cell response (IFN-ϒ production, cytotoxicity) at week 4, which diminished at later weeks |
| Aregay et al. [ | 1a/1b | 40 | Effect of successful treatment | at EOT and 24 weeks post-EOT (SVR24) | unaltered expression of PD-1, Tim-3, LAG-3 and CD5 on HCV-specific CD8+ T cells |
| Hartnell et al. [ | NA | 21 | Effect of successful treatment | average 6 weeks post-treatment (range 0–26 weeks) | unchanged proliferative capacity and cytokine production (TNF-α, IFN-ϒ MIP-1β) of exhausted HCV-specific CD4+ T cells |
| Smits et al. [ | 1, 2, 3 | 40 | Effect of successful treatment | week 2, either 8, 12, 16 or 24 week of treatment (EOT) and 24 weeks post-treatment (SVR24) | ↑ HCV-specific CD4+ T cells within the initial two weeks of treatment |
↑—increase; ↓—decrease; NA—not available.