| Literature DB >> 32722228 |
Gerardo Gómez-García1, José Antonio Marín-Marín1, José-María Romero-Rodríguez1, Magdalena Ramos Navas-Parejo1, Carmen Rodríguez Jiménez1.
Abstract
Currently, there are several methodological models that have broken into different disciplines of knowledge with the aim of making the teaching/learning process more dynamic, active and participatory for students. This is the case of Flipped Classroom, which is based on a mixed approach between e-learning and face-to-face teaching, as well as gamification, which bases its didactic principles on the recreational components of the games. Within this context, the aim of this research is to observe what effect the application of Flipped Classroom and gamification has in the development of motivation, autonomy and self-regulation towards learning through a didactic unit on healthy habits and diet in 202 students of 6th grade of Primary School from four different schools (public and state-subsidized) in the city of Granada (Spain). For this purpose, a methodological design was used with pre-test and post-test to check the effects of the experience on the students. The findings obtained showed that the application of these methods promoted an increase in students' motivation, as well as in their autonomy and self-regulation when facing the contents of the subject. For this reason, it is advocated that there is a need to continue promoting a quality and innovative educational practice according to the figure of the student today.Entities:
Keywords: Flipped Classroom; educational innovation; gamification; nutritional education; primary education
Year: 2020 PMID: 32722228 PMCID: PMC7468774 DOI: 10.3390/nu12082210
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Comparison between traditional methodology, Flipped Classroom and gamification.
| Traditional Teaching | Flipped Classroom | Gamification |
|---|---|---|
| The role of the student is passive, limited to the role of receiver. The teacher is in charge of transmitting the contents in a theoretical way. After this, a series of activities are sent to the student to be carried out at home. In most cases it is evaluated through a written exam. | The student has two learning phases: (a) a phase outside the classroom, where he or she visualizes training videos and can complete tasks online; (b) in the classroom, he or she prepares practical tasks and projects, and resolves doubts about the material visualized at home. The evaluation is more dynamic, since it contemplates a greater number of indicators (online work, project work, written and oral tests, etc.) | The educational scenario is transformed, elements of play are introduced with a didactic intention. In this case, the game by badges aims to grant recognition of having overcome a task, activity or present a positive behaviour through the granting of these distinctions. These recognitions will be assigned to different parameters of the final evaluation. Therefore, it is an evaluation strategy that is motivating for students. |
Socio-demographic data of the study sample.
|
| % | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Public | 98 | 49.02 |
| Private | 104 | 50.98 |
|
| ||
| Boy | 82 | 40.6 |
| Girl | 120 | 59.4 |
|
| ||
| 11 | 111 | 54.95 |
| 12 | 91 | 45.05 |
Distribution of the unit’s topics, sessions and hours.
| Topics | Development of the Session | Sessions | Nº Videos | Video Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Types of nutrients | The different types of nutrients are explained: carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, vitamins, water and mineral salts. Exercises are established and daily food and nutrients are related. Similarly, it also refers to the effects that occur if we exceed some of these nutrients. | 1 | 1 | 7:25 min |
|
The balanced diet. The Food Pyramid. | The NAOS food pyramid (set up by the Spanish Ministry of Health) was used. Foods that are at the top are analysed (ice cream, fast food, chocolate, etc.), warned about their excessive consumption, and the number of times per week that foods such as meat, fish, fruits or vegetables should be ingested is described. We work with students to develop a schedule of their daily meals in order to analyse and share them. The aim is to identify who is living a healthy life and who is not. | 2 | 2 | 9:32 min, 6:30 min |
|
Social factors and practices that are detrimental to healthy development | The aim is to make students aware of the importance of preventing harmful habits against health, such as the use of tobacco, alcohol or drugs. Subsequently, awareness activities are established based on this theme. | 1 | 2 | 6:50 min, 7:15 min |
|
Health benefits of physical activity | In collaboration with the Physical Education material, students are presented with various simple exercises to do every day. The objective is to transmit that they should practice at least 60 min of useful physical activity. | 2 | 1 | 9:30 min |
|
Self-concept and bodily respect for others | Activities are presented to raise awareness of the value and acceptance of one’s own physical reality, possibilities and limitations. The focus is on developing values of respect for one’s own body and that of others. | 1 | 1 | 9:00 min |
| Total time | 7 | 7 | 54:82 min |
Figure 1Badges obtained by overcoming challenges, missions and adventures.
Descriptive statistics.
| Variable | Pre-Test | Post-Test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| MOT | 1.94 | 1.391 | 2.79 | 2.737 |
| AUT | 2.45 | 1.783 | 3.28 | 0.982 |
| SER | 1.71 | 0.723 | 2.82 | 1.89 |
Note: MOT = motivation; AUT = autonomy; SER = self-regulation.
Comparison between treatment group averages.
| Group | Average Range | Sum of Ranges | U-Mann Whitney | W-Wilcoxon | Z |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-test | 91.41 | 9546 | 3891 | 8241 | −0.724 | 0.000 |
| Post-test | 105.36 | 10,957 | 4695 | 9546 | −0.966 | 0.000 |
Figure 2Nature of data distributions and correlation between variables. Note: MOT = motivation; AUT = autonomy; SER = self-regulation.
Linear regression model for MOT.
| Estimate | Std. Error | t Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | 3.91870 | 1.06912 | 3.665 | 0.000318 | *** |
| Centre | −0.18773 | 0.36369 | −0.516 | 0.606302 | |
| AUT | 0.24808 | 0.03776 | 6.570 | 4.43 × 10−10 | *** |
| SER | 0.19150 | 0.04531 | 4.226 | 3.64 × 10−5 |
|
Note: MOT = motivation; AUT = autonomy; SER = self-regulation; *** = p < 0.001.
Linear regression model for AUT.
| Estimate | Std. Error | t Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | 6.05672 | 1.84246 | 3.287 | 0.0012 | ** |
| Centre | 0.81062 | 0.62054 | 1.306 | 0.1930 | * |
| MOT | 0.72752 | 0.11073 | 6.570 | 4.43 × 10−10 | *** |
| SER | 0.03263 | 0.08102 | 0.403 | 0.6876 |
Note: MOT = motivation; AUT = autonomy; SER = self-regulation; * = p < 0.5; ** = p < 0.01; *** = p < 0.001.
Linear regression model for SER.
| Estimate | Std. Error | t Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | 15.11493 | 1.27125 | 11.890 | 2 × 10−16 | *** |
| Centre | −0.69443 | 0.54699 | −1.270 | 0.206 | * |
| MOT | 0.43614 | 0.10320 | 4.226 | 3.64 × 10−5 | *** |
| AUT | 0.02534 | 0.06292 | 0.403 | 0.688 |
Note: MOT = motivation; AUT = autonomy; SER = self-regulation; * = p < 0.5; *** = p < 0.001.